發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-01 17:08

  本文選題：國(guó)際保理 + 應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著國(guó)際貿(mào)易競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的加劇、全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一體化進(jìn)程的加快以及國(guó)際買(mǎi)方市場(chǎng)的形成，價(jià)格、原材料成本等因素在世界范圍內(nèi)趨同，差別不大，而要想在國(guó)際貿(mào)易中取得對(duì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手的優(yōu)勢(shì)，就應(yīng)當(dāng)在其他方面作出努力，這也是國(guó)際保理在最近十幾年在國(guó)際貿(mào)易結(jié)算領(lǐng)域盛行的原因，特別在歐美發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家；但在我國(guó)，，國(guó)際保理這一支付方式卻沒(méi)有發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用，我國(guó)是國(guó)際貿(mào)易大國(guó)，貿(mào)易總額在世界居于前列，特別是東南沿海省份，出口導(dǎo)向性企業(yè)的數(shù)目眾多，所面臨的應(yīng)收賬款收取風(fēng)險(xiǎn)也就較大，而在此情形下國(guó)際保理卻未完全發(fā)展起來(lái)，究其原因就在于對(duì)國(guó)際保理法律基礎(chǔ)認(rèn)識(shí)不清，對(duì)在國(guó)際保理交易過(guò)程中存在的深層次法律問(wèn)題不夠明晰，從而在法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范問(wèn)題上做不到位。 本文的中心內(nèi)容就是圍繞這些問(wèn)題展開(kāi)，在分析國(guó)際保理交易法律性質(zhì)的基礎(chǔ)上，探求交易過(guò)程中深層次的法律問(wèn)題及其風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范，并對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)法律制度的建設(shè)提出自己的建議。本文共分為四部分，第一章主要是國(guó)際保理概述，目的就是通過(guò)對(duì)保理的定義及歷史演變的介紹，對(duì)國(guó)際保理含義及發(fā)展歷程有更好的理解，前者是理解后者的基礎(chǔ)；同時(shí)，對(duì)保理及國(guó)際保理的認(rèn)識(shí)，可以更好的幫助理解后文關(guān)于國(guó)際保理性質(zhì)是應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓而不是其他學(xué)說(shuō)的分析；在此部分還介紹了國(guó)際保理的特性，是在比較中展開(kāi)的，以便更好的在實(shí)踐中比對(duì)利用；第二章主要是分析國(guó)際保理交易的法律基礎(chǔ)是什么，在此部分主要介紹了比較重要也容易混淆的幾種觀點(diǎn)，最后分析得出應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓才是國(guó)際保理法律性質(zhì)的觀點(diǎn)，這個(gè)認(rèn)識(shí)是后文繼續(xù)分析的理論基礎(chǔ)；此部分還介紹了國(guó)際保理交易過(guò)程中的權(quán)利沖突，并介紹了對(duì)權(quán)利沖突的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)防范；第三章也是本文的重點(diǎn)，論述了國(guó)際保理交易中應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓所應(yīng)當(dāng)防范的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，從而為在實(shí)踐交易中對(duì)潛在風(fēng)險(xiǎn)有所防范，此部分風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的論述正是建立在上一部分對(duì)法律基礎(chǔ)的分析之上的，也是下一部分對(duì)我國(guó)國(guó)際法律制度提出建議的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)依據(jù)；最后一部分是關(guān)于我國(guó)國(guó)際保理的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r及完善相關(guān)法律制度的幾點(diǎn)建議，建議的提出基本都是建立在上文對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的分析基礎(chǔ)之上，這是本文的落腳點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:With the intensification of international trade competition, the acceleration of the process of global economic integration and the formation of international buyer's market, the price, raw material cost and other factors converge in the world. In order to gain advantages over competitors in international trade, efforts should be made in other areas. This is also the reason why international factoring has prevailed in the field of international trade settlement in recent years, especially in developed countries in Europe and the United States; but in China, However, international factoring has not played its due role. China is a big international trading country, and the total amount of trade is in the forefront of the world, especially in the southeast coastal provinces, and the number of export-oriented enterprises is numerous. In this case, the international factoring has not been fully developed. The reason is that the legal basis of international factoring is not clear. The deep legal problems in the process of international factoring are not clear enough. The central content of this paper is to start around these problems, on the basis of analyzing the legal nature of international factoring transactions, to explore the deep-seated legal problems and risk prevention in the course of transaction. And puts forward own suggestion to our country related legal system construction. This paper is divided into four parts. The first chapter is an overview of international factoring, the purpose of which is to have a better understanding of the meaning and development of international factoring through the introduction of the definition and historical evolution of factoring, the former is the basis of understanding the latter; at the same time, The understanding of factoring and international factoring can better help to understand the following analysis that the nature of international factoring is the transfer of accounts receivable rather than other theories. In this part, it also introduces the characteristics of international factoring, which is carried out in comparison. In order to better compare the use in practice; the second chapter is mainly to analyze the legal basis of international factoring transactions. In this part, it mainly introduces several views that are more important and easy to confuse. Finally, it is concluded that the transfer of accounts receivable is the legal nature of international factoring, which is the theoretical basis for further analysis. This part also introduces the conflicts of rights in the process of international factoring transactions. The third chapter is also the focus of this paper, which discusses the risks that should be prevented in the transfer of accounts receivable in international factoring transactions, so as to prevent the potential risks in practical transactions. This part of the risk is based on the previous part of the analysis of the legal basis, but also the next part of the international legal system of China's recommendations on the basis of risk; The last part is about the development of international factoring in China and several suggestions to improve the relevant legal system. The proposal is based on the above analysis of risk, which is the foothold of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D996;F740.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 徐鼎斌;;試論國(guó)際保理業(yè)務(wù)中相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題[J];重慶行政(公共論壇);2010年04期

2 翁建峰;吳麗華;;國(guó)際保理業(yè)務(wù)的運(yùn)作及其風(fēng)險(xiǎn)規(guī)避[J];福建金融;2005年11期

3 李勛;;銀行國(guó)際保理風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的法律研究[J];中南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 竇玫佳;國(guó)際保理中應(yīng)收帳款轉(zhuǎn)讓的法律問(wèn)題研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2004年

2 陳巧玲;國(guó)際保理中應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓的優(yōu)先權(quán)問(wèn)題研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2006年

3 廖楊;從《國(guó)際保理公約》析我國(guó)國(guó)際保理制度的相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題[D];湖南大學(xué);2007年

4 鄧建華;國(guó)際保理應(yīng)收賬款轉(zhuǎn)讓法律問(wèn)題研究[D];中南大學(xué);2008年

5 代賓;國(guó)際保理法律制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

6 鄭洪志;論我國(guó)保理商開(kāi)展國(guó)際保理的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與防范[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

本文編號(hào)：1830289