發(fā)布時間：2018-05-02 08:26

  本文選題：非征收違反 + 充分賠償原理　； 參考：《甘肅政法學院學報》2012年03期

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代國際投資協(xié)定的兩大顯著特征表現(xiàn)為:一方面規(guī)定了大量的投資實體權利保護條款,另一方面又規(guī)定了投資者訴東道國的創(chuàng)新性直訴權。在實體權利條款中,國際投資協(xié)定規(guī)定了征收必須提供"充分、及時、有效"的賠償;但是,對于東道國可能違反其它投資協(xié)定條款的賠償卻沒有做出具體規(guī)定。隨著大量非征收違反案件的出現(xiàn),投資仲裁庭開始求助于霍茹夫工廠案標準以及編纂了《國家責任條款草案》,并創(chuàng)造性地將之適用于非征收違反案件,但是這種適用也引發(fā)了一些需要思考的問題。
[Abstract]:Two prominent features of modern IIAS are: on the one hand, it stipulates a large number of investment entity rights protection clauses, on the other hand, it stipulates the innovative right of appeal from investors to host countries. In the substantive rights clause, the IIA provides that expropriation must provide "adequate, timely and effective" compensation; however, there is no specific provision for compensation for possible breaches of other IIA provisions by the host country. With the emergence of a large number of cases of non-expropriation violations, the investment tribunal began to resort to the Chorzouf factory standards and to compile the draft articles on State responsibility, and creatively applied them to cases of non-expropriation violations, But this application also raises some questions to think about.
【作者單位】： 廈門大學法學院;
【分類號】：D996.4
，

本文編號：1833146