發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-29 21:48

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 并購(gòu) 所有者 經(jīng)營(yíng)者 勞動(dòng)者 關(guān)系　出處：《華東政法學(xué)院》2002年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：中國(guó)加入WTO之初,國(guó)內(nèi)外經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境迅速變化,企業(yè)并購(gòu)步伐正在加快,跨國(guó)公司對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)的戰(zhàn)略性持股也已成為可能。由于企業(yè)并購(gòu)的復(fù)雜性,它所涉及的法律問題也非常多。如何對(duì)企業(yè)并購(gòu)的方方面面進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制,是擺在中國(guó)法律工作者面前的一個(gè)緊迫課題。 并購(gòu)作為一種特殊的經(jīng)濟(jì)、法律現(xiàn)象,每逢發(fā)生時(shí),各種利益往往激烈交鋒、尖銳對(duì)立;作為一切利益的最終主體,“人”的因素往往決定了并購(gòu)的成敗得失。 另一方面,企業(yè)并購(gòu)并非僅僅是物質(zhì)資源再分配,同時(shí)也是人力資源重新配置的過程。人力資源既包括企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)者即高級(jí)管理人員(董事、經(jīng)理等),也包括其他勞動(dòng)者。 從公司法、證券法、反壟斷法等角度闡述并購(gòu)問題的論文、著作可謂汗牛充棟,其中不乏經(jīng)典之作;泛泛地探討所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者關(guān)系、企業(yè)與勞動(dòng)者關(guān)系的論述,也屢見不鮮。并購(gòu)中必須考慮“人”的因素,但對(duì)并購(gòu)發(fā)生時(shí)企業(yè)及所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者和其他勞動(dòng)者的關(guān)系以及相關(guān)法律規(guī)制作出的探討,還不夠充分。本文力圖在這 WP=4 方面作出拋磚引玉的嘗試。 本文從“契約說”的企業(yè)定義入手,在對(duì)所有者、經(jīng)營(yíng)者和其他勞動(dòng)者作出必要的界定之后,分兩個(gè)部分對(duì)企業(yè)及所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者和其他勞動(dòng)者的關(guān)系以及相關(guān)法律規(guī)制作出了探討:第一部分,闡述并購(gòu)中所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者的關(guān)系及其法律規(guī)制,分析研究所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者關(guān)系的一般原則、并購(gòu)中的“內(nèi)部人控制”問題、上市公司獨(dú)立董事制度及其在并購(gòu)中的作用、與并購(gòu)有關(guān)的內(nèi)幕交易和信息披露以及所有者利益保護(hù)機(jī)制,并對(duì)并購(gòu)中所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了宏觀思考;第二部分,闡述并購(gòu)中企業(yè)與勞動(dòng)者(包括經(jīng)營(yíng)者和其他勞動(dòng)者)的關(guān)系及其法律規(guī)制,分析研究并購(gòu)中勞動(dòng)關(guān)系處理的基本原則及其法律適用、并購(gòu)中勞動(dòng)(聘用)合同的解除、并購(gòu)中與勞動(dòng)者相關(guān)的繼承以及并購(gòu)中勞動(dòng)關(guān)系法律規(guī)制的國(guó)際借鑒,并對(duì)勞動(dòng)法相關(guān)內(nèi)容的修改和完善提出了一些建議。 筆者認(rèn)為:所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者的一般關(guān)系,集中體現(xiàn)為公司治理問題;并購(gòu)發(fā)生時(shí),公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)是否良性、所有者對(duì)經(jīng)營(yíng)者能否進(jìn)行有效控制,往往成為并購(gòu)成敗的關(guān)鍵;妥善處理并購(gòu)中所有者與經(jīng)營(yíng)者的關(guān)系,有賴于具有中國(guó)特色的公司治理體系的構(gòu)筑,對(duì)國(guó)有企業(yè)而言,關(guān)鍵是解決“所有者虛位”問題,創(chuàng)造治理動(dòng)力。 從勞動(dòng)關(guān)系的角度,企業(yè)并購(gòu)?fù)�往�?dǎo)致裁員,完善的勞動(dòng)法律制度必不可少;勞動(dòng)法固然應(yīng)向弱者即勞動(dòng)者一方適當(dāng)傾斜,但不可矯枉過正,應(yīng)在資本意志與勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益之間尋求合理平衡,并對(duì)企業(yè)并購(gòu)所涉及的競(jìng)業(yè)限制、商業(yè)秘密保護(hù)、被裁減人員的就業(yè)安置和社會(huì)保障作出明確具體的立法安排。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of China's entry into WTO, the economic environment at home and abroad has changed rapidly, the pace of M & A is speeding up, and the strategic ownership of Chinese enterprises by multinational corporations has become possible, because of the complexity of M & A. It involves a lot of legal problems. How to regulate all aspects of M & A is an urgent issue for Chinese legal workers. M & A is a special phenomenon of economy and law. When it happens, the interests of M & A are often confronted with each other intensely and acutely. As the ultimate subject of all interests, the factor of "person" often determines the success or failure of M & A. On the other hand, M & A is not only the redistribution of material resources, but also the process of reconfiguration of human resources. It also includes other workers. From the angle of company law, securities law, anti-monopoly law and so on, the thesis on M & A issues can be said to be full of books, among which there are many classic works. It is also common to discuss the relationship between owner and operator and between enterprise and laborer in a general way. The factors of "person" must be considered in M & A. However, it is not enough to probe into the relationship between the enterprise, its owner, operator and other laborers and the relevant legal regulations when the merger and acquisition occurs. WP=4 Aspects of the attempt to throw a brick to attract jade. This article starts with the definition of "contract theory", after making the necessary definition to the owner, operator and other laborer. There are two parts to discuss the relationship between the enterprise owner and operator and other workers as well as the related legal regulation. The first part expounds the relationship between owner and operator in M & A and its legal regulation. This paper analyzes and studies the general principles of the relationship between owner and operator, the problem of "insider control" in M & A, the system of independent directors of listed companies and its role in M & A. Insider trading and information disclosure related to M & A, as well as the protection mechanism of owners' interests, and the relationship between owners and managers in M & A are considered macroscopically. The second part describes the relationship between enterprises and workers (including operators and other workers) and its legal regulation, and analyzes the basic principles and legal application of labor relations in M & A. The termination of labor (employment) contract in M & A, the inheritance related to laborer in M & A, and the international reference to the legal regulation of labor relations in M & A, and some suggestions on the modification and perfection of labor law are put forward. The author thinks that the general relationship between the owner and the operator is mainly reflected in the problem of corporate governance; When M & A occurs, whether the corporate governance structure is benign or not, and whether the owner can effectively control the operator is often the key to the success or failure of M & A. The proper handling of the relationship between owner and manager in M & A depends on the construction of corporate governance system with Chinese characteristics. For state-owned enterprises, the key is to solve the problem of "the fictitious position of owner" and to create the power of governance. From the perspective of labor relations, mergers and acquisitions often lead to layoffs, and a perfect labor legal system is essential; Although the labor law should be inclined to the weak, that is, the laborer, it should not be overcorrected, and should seek a reasonable balance between the will of capital and the rights and interests of the laborer, and restrict the competition of enterprise merger and acquisition. Trade secret protection, the employment placement and social security of the reduced personnel to make clear and specific legislative arrangements.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號(hào)】：D922.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 郭富青;論公司要約收購(gòu)與反收購(gòu)中少數(shù)股東利益的保護(hù)[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年04期

2 翁海生,姜玉梅,何江琳;試論公司收購(gòu)的信息公開制度[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2000年05期

3 白玉琴;評(píng)我國(guó)證券法第四章“上市公司收購(gòu)”[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2000年04期

4 梅君;上市公司收購(gòu)與股東大會(huì)制度——對(duì)2000年召開的三家股東大會(huì)的實(shí)證研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年01期

5 張勁松;試論對(duì)國(guó)際性并購(gòu)的法律管制[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1474431