發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 14:31

  本文選題：民生權(quán)利 + 行政訴訟��； 參考：《學(xué)術(shù)交流》2017年08期

【摘要】：民生權(quán)利的可訴性是實(shí)現(xiàn)"政策性恩給"向"國(guó)家給付義務(wù)"過渡的必然條件。民生權(quán)利是社會(huì)權(quán)、社會(huì)福利權(quán)以及權(quán)利救濟(jì)的集合體,公民享有的國(guó)家給付請(qǐng)求權(quán)基礎(chǔ)是:透過民生立法,將憲法上的"綱領(lǐng)性規(guī)定"和"基本權(quán)利"具體化為受行政訴訟法保護(hù)的法益。民生權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn)依賴于給付行政的積極作為,但是,對(duì)給付行政的司法審查及其裁判應(yīng)保持一定的限度,容許行政判斷余地的存在�；�于民主正當(dāng)性原理,對(duì)民生立法不作為或立法不充分的行為,司法審查也應(yīng)保持謙抑性。
[Abstract]:The justiciability of people's livelihood rights is the necessary condition for the transition from "policy grace" to "national obligation". People's livelihood right is a collection of social right, social welfare right and right relief. The "programmatic provisions" and "fundamental rights" in the Constitution are translated into legal benefits protected by the Administrative procedure Law. The realization of the people's livelihood rights depends on the positive actions of the administration of payment. However, the judicial review of the administration of payment and its adjudication should maintain a certain limit and allow the existence of the leeway of administrative judgment. On the basis of the principle of democratic legitimacy, judicial review should also maintain modesty in respect of acts of omission or inadequate legislation of the people's livelihood.
【作者單位】： 泰州學(xué)院人文學(xué)院;蘇州大學(xué)王健法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2016年度江蘇高校哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)研究基金項(xiàng)目“行政給付訴訟類型研究”(2016SJD750021) 2017年泰州學(xué)院重點(diǎn)課題“行政訴訟判決類型研究”(TZXY2016ZDKT001)
【分類號(hào)】：D925.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 羅英;;我國(guó)給付行政正當(dāng)程序的立法現(xiàn)狀研究[J];時(shí)代法學(xué);2011年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1897234