發(fā)布時間：2018-05-16 16:20

  本文選題：非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人 + 當(dāng)事人適格��； 參考：《大連理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人是我國民事訴訟理論中的懸案。我國對非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人采任意化的處理方式,打破了訴權(quán)與審判權(quán)的平衡,破壞了程序的安定性,降低了訴訟效率。非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人的要件屬性決定了其處理方式,將非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人作為訴訟要件或權(quán)利保護要件各有利弊,我國《民訴法》并未統(tǒng)一非正當(dāng)原告與非正當(dāng)被告的要件屬性,違反了當(dāng)事人平等原則。非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人具體可類型化為自始不適格當(dāng)事人與后續(xù)不適格當(dāng)事人,這對修正"非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人"與"非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人的處理方式"之間的關(guān)系有重要意義。應(yīng)從"非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人"的本源出發(fā),統(tǒng)一非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人的處理方式,可推動我國民事訴訟的體系化、提高訴訟效率并保障當(dāng)事人訴權(quán)。具體應(yīng)以訴訟承繼制度作為處理非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人的基礎(chǔ),充分發(fā)揮法官闡明權(quán)并建立獨立的救濟機制。
[Abstract]:Illegitimate parties are unsolved cases in the theory of civil action in our country. In our country, the arbitrary way of dealing with the improper parties has broken the balance between the right of action and the right of adjudication, destroyed the stability of the procedure and reduced the efficiency of litigation. The attribute of the elements of the improper parties determines the way to deal with them. There are advantages and disadvantages in treating the improper parties as the elements of litigation or protection of rights. The Civil procedure Law of our country has not unified the attributes of the elements of the improper plaintiff and the improper defendant. In violation of the principle of equality of the parties. The concrete types of improper parties can be divided into unsuitable parties from beginning to end and unfit parties from later on, which is of great significance in revising the relationship between "improper parties" and "ways of dealing with illegitimate parties". We should start from the origin of "improper parties" and unify the ways of dealing with illegitimate parties, which can promote the systematization of civil litigation in our country, improve the efficiency of litigation and protect the litigant's right of action. The system of litigation succession should be taken as the basis of dealing with the illegitimate parties and the judge's right of clarification should be brought into full play and an independent relief mechanism should be established.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社科基金項目:“邁向制度理性的民事程序研究”(14CFX028) 中央高�；�本科研業(yè)務(wù)費專項資金資助項目:“民事糾紛的多元化解決機制研究”(10XNI033)
【分類號】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 馮珂;關(guān)于正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人的若干思考[J];河南社會科學(xué);2003年03期

2 肖建華,吳小隆;非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人及其更換的法理分析[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2000年01期

3 肖建華,楊琦萍;非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人與判決效力的主觀范圍[J];湖南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年04期

4 滕琛;;談公益訴訟視野下的正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人制度[J];商情(教育經(jīng)濟研究);2007年02期

5 張瑞杰;張瑞霞;;論非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人的程序處理[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2012年01期

6 郭海洋;;論我國民事訴訟非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人處理制度的完善[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2014年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 馬超芬;論正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人制度[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

2 鞠敏;論非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人更換制度[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

3 宋春龍;論非正當(dāng)當(dāng)事人及其變更[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

，

本文編號：1897561