發(fā)布時間：2018-05-18 19:44

  本文選題：知識產(chǎn)權(quán) + 仲裁　； 參考：《太原科技大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：近期，法院對近年來積壓的案件進行匯總，發(fā)現(xiàn)積壓較多的是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)類的案件，可知運用訴訟解決此類糾紛有可能會面臨著訴訟周期長或做出的判決不夠?qū)�業(yè)等問題。仲裁憑其快捷性、專業(yè)性強的優(yōu)勢在世界范圍內(nèi)開始引得人們的重視，在解決知識產(chǎn)權(quán)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)發(fā)揮著越來越重要的作用，但仲裁在我國發(fā)展的比較晚，，尤其是知識產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁才剛剛起步，并不是所有的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛都能通過仲裁解決，針對不同類型的糾紛要劃分不同的可仲裁性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，所以仲裁在解決知識產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛時也面臨著存在不少問題，比如立法上對可仲裁性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)規(guī)定的不明確、仲裁中財產(chǎn)保全制度不健全等，實踐中缺乏專門的知識產(chǎn)權(quán)仲裁機構(gòu)、公眾的仲裁意識不強等。解決某一問題需要對該問題產(chǎn)生的原因進行分析，通過對其他國家的立法狀況及實踐經(jīng)驗進行研究，可以發(fā)現(xiàn)，國外在立法上對可仲裁性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、仲裁中采取的財產(chǎn)保全措施的程序規(guī)定的很明確，還建立許多專門的仲裁機構(gòu)，對仲裁的宣傳力度也很大，在實踐中操作性很強，這對我國仲裁事業(yè)的發(fā)展有很大的幫助，我們既要在立法上及實踐中借鑒他國經(jīng)驗，并與我國的現(xiàn)實情況相結(jié)合，同時與其他糾紛解決機制進行協(xié)調(diào)，使仲裁的優(yōu)勢發(fā)揮到最佳狀態(tài)。
[Abstract]:Recently, the court summarized the backlog of cases in recent years, found that the backlog is more cases of intellectual property rights, we can know that the use of litigation to resolve such disputes may face a long litigation cycle or the decision is not professional and other issues. By virtue of its rapidity and professionalism, arbitration begins to attract people's attention in the world and plays an increasingly important role in the field of intellectual property rights. However, arbitration develops relatively late in our country. In particular, intellectual property arbitration is just in its infancy. Not all intellectual property disputes can be resolved through arbitration. Different arbitrability standards should be assigned to different types of disputes. Therefore, arbitration also faces many problems in resolving intellectual property disputes. For example, the legislative provisions on arbitrability standards are not clear, the property preservation system in arbitration is not perfect, and there is a lack of specialized intellectual property arbitration institutions in practice. The public's consciousness of arbitration is not strong. To solve a certain problem, we need to analyze the causes of the problem, and through the study of the legislative situation and practical experience of other countries, we can find that the foreign countries have the standards of arbitrability in legislation. The procedure for property preservation measures adopted in arbitration is very clear, and many specialized arbitration institutions have also been set up. The publicity for arbitration is also very strong, and it is very operational in practice. This is of great help to the development of arbitration in our country. We should draw lessons from the experience of other countries in legislation and practice, and combine with the reality of our country, at the same time, coordinate with other dispute settlement mechanism, so as to bring the advantage of arbitration into full play.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.7;D923.4

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 郭曉燕;;非訴訟糾紛解決方式建構(gòu)緣由探析[J];山東省青年管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年04期

2 黃暉;;知識產(chǎn)權(quán)可仲裁性的發(fā)展趨勢論[J];仲裁研究;2013年01期

本文編號：1906962