我國質詢權法律規(guī)范的問題分析及完善建議
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-13 07:59
【摘要】：人大監(jiān)督權的實現對于國家權力的有效運轉,人民權利的保障有著重要作用,而質詢權作為監(jiān)督權的一種重要形式,無論是理論上還是實踐中,都沒有得到足夠的重視,從而也影響了質詢權的實效發(fā)揮,不利于監(jiān)督權的實現。作為質詢權實施最根本的依憑,質詢權法律規(guī)范的完善與否對質詢權運行有著至關重要的作用,本文以我國質詢權法律規(guī)范為中心,首先就質詢權的概念、性質、特點、功能、淵源和發(fā)展等作必要概述；其次是介紹了我國既有的質詢權法律規(guī)范內容,并從質詢權實體規(guī)范層面存在的質詢權需人大代表集體行使、質詢案提起人數劃分不當、質詢權的內容尚無規(guī)范、司法機關是否為質詢對象、個人應否作為質詢對象五個方面來分析其問題,而程序規(guī)范層面則就提起質詢案的時間限制、提起質詢案的形式限制、質詢答復程序規(guī)定過于籠統(tǒng)、質詢缺乏結果程序這四個方面來分析其存在的問題；最后結合西方議會制國家的相關規(guī)定,針對上述問題建議分別從放寬提起質詢的人數要求、增加質詢權內容的法律規(guī)范、明確司法機關和機關負責人作為質詢權對象三方面來完善我國質詢權的實體法律規(guī)范,而程序規(guī)范方面就啟動程序、答復程序、結果程序三方面來提出完善建議。
[Abstract]:The realization of the supervision power of the National people's Congress plays an important role in the effective operation of state power and the protection of the rights of the people, and the right of inquiry, as an important form of supervision power, has not been paid enough attention either in theory or in practice. Thus, it also affects the actual effect of the right of inquiry, which is not conducive to the realization of the power of supervision. As the most fundamental basis for the implementation of the right of inquiry, the perfection of the legal norms of the right of inquiry plays a vital role in the operation of the right of inquiry. This paper focuses on the legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, first of all, on the concept, nature, characteristics and functions of the right of inquiry. Make a necessary summary of the origin and development; Secondly, it introduces the existing legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, and from the level of the norms of the entity of the right of inquiry, the right of inquiry needs to be exercised collectively by the deputies to the National people's Congress, the number of cases raised is improperly divided, and the content of the right of inquiry is not yet standardized. Whether the judiciary is the object of questioning or not, whether individuals should analyze their problems as the object of inquiry, while at the level of procedural norms, the time limit for filing questions, the formal restrictions on filing questions, and the procedures for answering questions are too general. The lack of outcome procedure is used to analyze the existing problems. Finally, combined with the relevant provisions of the western parliamentary countries, in view of the above problems, it is suggested that the legal norms of the content of the right of inquiry should be increased by relaxing the requirements for the number of people asking questions. Make clear that the judicial organ and the person in charge of the organ as the object of inquiry right to improve the substantive legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, and the procedural norms on the initiation of procedures, response procedures, results procedures to improve the three aspects of suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：福建師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1
本文編號：2475720
[Abstract]:The realization of the supervision power of the National people's Congress plays an important role in the effective operation of state power and the protection of the rights of the people, and the right of inquiry, as an important form of supervision power, has not been paid enough attention either in theory or in practice. Thus, it also affects the actual effect of the right of inquiry, which is not conducive to the realization of the power of supervision. As the most fundamental basis for the implementation of the right of inquiry, the perfection of the legal norms of the right of inquiry plays a vital role in the operation of the right of inquiry. This paper focuses on the legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, first of all, on the concept, nature, characteristics and functions of the right of inquiry. Make a necessary summary of the origin and development; Secondly, it introduces the existing legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, and from the level of the norms of the entity of the right of inquiry, the right of inquiry needs to be exercised collectively by the deputies to the National people's Congress, the number of cases raised is improperly divided, and the content of the right of inquiry is not yet standardized. Whether the judiciary is the object of questioning or not, whether individuals should analyze their problems as the object of inquiry, while at the level of procedural norms, the time limit for filing questions, the formal restrictions on filing questions, and the procedures for answering questions are too general. The lack of outcome procedure is used to analyze the existing problems. Finally, combined with the relevant provisions of the western parliamentary countries, in view of the above problems, it is suggested that the legal norms of the content of the right of inquiry should be increased by relaxing the requirements for the number of people asking questions. Make clear that the judicial organ and the person in charge of the organ as the object of inquiry right to improve the substantive legal norms of the right of inquiry in our country, and the procedural norms on the initiation of procedures, response procedures, results procedures to improve the three aspects of suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：福建師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 李行;;健全和完善我國質詢制度的思考[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);2008年02期
2 薛侃;;人大監(jiān)督的規(guī)范化走向[J];福建法學;2008年04期
3 徐運良;加強與完善人民代表大會質詢制度的途徑與措施——人民代表大會質詢制度研究(三)[J];福建廣播電視大學學報;2003年05期
4 傅林;憲法對質詢制度規(guī)定的疏漏及其完善[J];法學;2001年02期
5 劉茂林,韋艷芹;借鑒、剖析與完善——對人大代表質詢權的再次關注[J];廣西政法管理干部學院學報;2002年01期
6 胡弘弘;別讓質詢權睡著了[J];河北法學;2000年06期
7 楊成;;質詢權性質的辨析[J];河北法學;2010年12期
8 朱煒;關于人大質詢法院的若干思考——兼議憲法第73條[J];杭州師范學院學報(社會科學版);2003年04期
9 王春業(yè);;論我國權力機關質詢制度及其完善[J];湖北行政學院學報;2007年02期
10 毛原;關于地方人大行使質詢權的幾個問題[J];內蒙古經濟管理干部學院學報;1999年04期
，本文編號：2475720
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2475720.html
