發(fā)布時間：2018-05-02 01:44

  本文選題：文化產(chǎn)權 + 共有權益��； 參考：《河南工業(yè)大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：文化產(chǎn)權交易是根據(jù)證券交易和產(chǎn)權交易共同演化而形成的一種新型交易模式,其本身是多層資本市場的有益補充,能夠促進文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與金融資本的深入結(jié)合。十七屆六中全會首次將“文化命題”作為中央全會的議題,極力推動了我國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)經(jīng)濟進入發(fā)展繁榮的新階段,在此背景下,國內(nèi)各地紛紛立項并建設文化產(chǎn)權交易所,由此引發(fā)了文化產(chǎn)業(yè)融資與交易模式的廣泛探討和實踐。 研究遵循“現(xiàn)狀分析—理論研究—模型設計—應用分析”的規(guī)范過程,首先對文化產(chǎn)權的內(nèi)涵和交易模式進行理論分析,并總結(jié)現(xiàn)階段文化產(chǎn)權市場發(fā)展過程中所存在的典型問題,在此基礎上提出共有權益拆分交易模式,并進而分析了該模式的關鍵因素、交易流程、體系框架和風險防范等具體環(huán)節(jié)；其次以鄭州文化產(chǎn)權交易所作為案例研究對象,應用共有權益拆分交易模式針對鄭州文化產(chǎn)權交易所的經(jīng)營結(jié)構和市場策略進行重新構建,并以經(jīng)濟效益和社會效益為指標驗證該模式的可行性和有效性,最后從宏觀政策和企業(yè)自身兩個方面分析并提出了基于共有權益拆分交易模式的文化產(chǎn)權市場發(fā)展對策。 主要結(jié)論為：(1)文化產(chǎn)權交易能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與金融資本的有效對接,而目前以利益驅(qū)動機制為核心的份額化交易模式在一定程度上違背了傳統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟倫理,放大投機機制并造成流動性泛濫,影響了文化產(chǎn)權交易市場的可持續(xù)性發(fā)展；(2)基于產(chǎn)權理論的共有權益拆分交易模式能夠有效拓展文化產(chǎn)業(yè)融資渠道并降低交易風險,促進文化產(chǎn)權交易制度的健全和市場發(fā)展的規(guī)范,引導文化產(chǎn)權市場良性發(fā)展；(3)應用表明,基于產(chǎn)權理論的共有權益拆分交易模式能夠強化鄭州文化產(chǎn)權交易所的定價權,有效提升企業(yè)經(jīng)營績效,促進鄭州區(qū)域性金融中心的建設和發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Cultural property right transaction is a new kind of transaction mode formed by the mutual evolution of securities transaction and property right transaction. It is a beneficial supplement of multi-layer capital market and can promote the deep combination of cultural industry and financial capital. For the first time, the sixth Plenary session of the 17th CPC Central Committee took "cultural proposition" as the topic of the plenary session, which pushed the cultural industry economy into a new stage of development and prosperity. In this context, various parts of the country set up projects and set up cultural property exchanges one after another. This has caused the culture industry financing and the transaction pattern extensive discussion and the practice. The research follows the normative process of "current situation analysis, theoretical research, model design and application analysis". Firstly, the connotation and transaction mode of cultural property rights are analyzed theoretically. On the basis of summarizing the typical problems existing in the process of the development of the cultural property market at present, the paper puts forward the split transaction model of common rights and interests, and then analyzes the key factors and the trading process of the model. Secondly, taking Zhengzhou Cultural property Exchange as the case study object, applying the split transaction mode of common rights and interests to rebuild the management structure and market strategy of Zhengzhou Cultural property Exchange. The feasibility and effectiveness of the model are verified by taking economic and social benefits as indicators. Finally, the development countermeasures of cultural property market based on the split transaction model of common rights and interests are analyzed and put forward from two aspects of macro policy and enterprise itself. The main conclusion is that the cultural property right transaction can realize the effective connection between the cultural industry and the financial capital, but the share trading mode, which is based on the interest driven mechanism, to some extent violates the traditional economic ethics. Magnifying speculation mechanism and causing liquidity flooding, which affect the sustainable development of cultural property rights trading market. (2) the split transaction model based on property right theory can effectively expand financing channels and reduce transaction risk of cultural industry. The application of promoting the perfection of cultural property right transaction system and the standardization of market development and guiding the benign development of cultural property right market shows that the split transaction model of common rights and interests based on property right theory can strengthen the pricing power of Zhengzhou Cultural property right Exchange. Effectively improve business performance, promote the construction and development of Zhengzhou regional financial center.
【學位授予單位】：河南工業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G124;F832.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 潘衛(wèi)杰;;試論民族文化產(chǎn)權及其保護[J];產(chǎn)權導刊;2007年03期

2 苑德軍,任志宏;關于證券公司監(jiān)管的幾個理論問題[J];當代財經(jīng);2002年02期

3 顏純鈞;文化產(chǎn)權和文化安全[J];東南學術;2004年S1期

4 高宏存;;經(jīng)濟全球化中的文化產(chǎn)權問題研究[J];福建論壇(人文社會科學版);2010年06期

5 沈勇;全球化時代藝術生態(tài)價值的取向[J];廣西教育學院學報;2004年01期

6 龍夫;;文化產(chǎn)權交易:撬動文化產(chǎn)業(yè)騰飛的杠桿——訪上海文化產(chǎn)權交易所負責人張?zhí)靃J];上海國資;2009年10期

7 尚雨;顧江;;收益外溢、產(chǎn)權失靈與中國文化產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟探討;2007年02期

8 楊新紅;產(chǎn)權交易平臺的構建與結(jié)構調(diào)整──從經(jīng)濟體制改革宣傳中想到的一些問題[J];經(jīng)濟問題探索;2001年05期

9 常林朝;李源;;河南省知識產(chǎn)權交易市場建設與發(fā)展對策研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年07期

10 周洪濤;單曉光;;知識產(chǎn)權文化與知識產(chǎn)權制度關系研究——以知識產(chǎn)權制度的困境為視角[J];科學學研究;2009年01期

，

本文編號：1831876