發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-28 05:24

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 銀行業(yè) 行政壟斷 ISCP框架 消極影響　出處：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著國(guó)家對(duì)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的重視,認(rèn)識(shí)到要讓市場(chǎng)發(fā)揮決定性作用,逐步打破各種形式的壟斷,中國(guó)銀行業(yè)的發(fā)展與改革面臨前所未有的壓力與挑戰(zhàn)。當(dāng)前我國(guó)銀行業(yè)的發(fā)展與改革已經(jīng)到達(dá)了一個(gè)臨界點(diǎn),銀行業(yè)后續(xù)的發(fā)展和壯大不得不面臨對(duì)存在已久的行政管制加以突破和改變,正確全面的認(rèn)識(shí)銀行業(yè)存在的問題,不管是對(duì)整個(gè)行業(yè)還是國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)與金融的穩(wěn)定發(fā)展,都具有重要的意義。中國(guó)銀行業(yè)與國(guó)外存在顯著的差異,基于我國(guó)特殊的大環(huán)境下,銀行業(yè)存在突出的壟斷性,其產(chǎn)生存在非常強(qiáng)的制度因素,隸屬行政壟斷。因?yàn)槲覀儑?guó)家的市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制起步較晚,所以尚未形成一個(gè)完善的體系,傳統(tǒng)的SCP分析框架并不適用于國(guó)內(nèi)的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況。本文就借鑒于良春構(gòu)建的ISCP框架,增加了制度因素,對(duì)我國(guó)銀行業(yè)行政壟斷進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析與研究,具有很強(qiáng)的理論價(jià)值和指導(dǎo)意義。本文首先整理了國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述,其中包括壟斷和行政壟斷、銀行業(yè)行政壟斷以及ISCP研究理論的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),為下文的寫作奠定了堅(jiān)實(shí)的理論基礎(chǔ)。其次文章闡述了中國(guó)銀行業(yè)行政壟斷的演化過(guò)程,從政治體制、經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)、理論依據(jù)和制度變遷偏好四個(gè)方面分析了銀行業(yè)行政壟斷的原因。文章重點(diǎn)借鑒于良春構(gòu)建的ISCP框架,結(jié)合銀行業(yè)自身特點(diǎn),設(shè)立能夠體現(xiàn)銀行業(yè)行政壟斷水平的三級(jí)指標(biāo),并對(duì)其展開深層次剖析,反映出國(guó)內(nèi)銀行業(yè)行政壟斷程度較深。由于本文界定行政壟斷為反壟斷法定義的違法行為,就從宏觀和微觀兩個(gè)層面來(lái)分析行政壟斷對(duì)我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的消極影響。最后根據(jù)上文的系統(tǒng)分析,通過(guò)引鑒國(guó)際上銀行業(yè)反壟斷成功經(jīng)驗(yàn),進(jìn)而對(duì)國(guó)內(nèi)銀行業(yè)改革以及行業(yè)壟斷規(guī)則完善提供相應(yīng)建議與策略。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the importance attached by the state to the market economy, it has been recognized that the market must play a decisive role and gradually break all forms of monopoly, The development and reform of China's banking industry is facing unprecedented pressures and challenges. At present, the development and reform of China's banking industry has reached a critical point. The subsequent development and expansion of the banking industry have to face the need to break through and change the long-existing administrative controls, correctly and comprehensively understand the problems existing in the banking industry, whether it is to the stable development of the whole industry or the national economy and finance. There are significant differences between China's banking industry and foreign countries. Based on the special environment of our country, the banking industry has outstanding monopoly, which has very strong institutional factors. Administrative monopoly. Because our country's market economic system started late, so has not formed a perfect system, the traditional SCP analysis framework is not suitable for the domestic reality. It is of great theoretical value and guiding significance to analyze and study systematically the administrative monopoly of banking industry in China. Firstly, this paper summarizes the relevant literature at home and abroad, including monopoly and administrative monopoly. The related documents of banking administrative monopoly and ISCP theory lay a solid theoretical foundation for the following writing. Secondly, the article expounds the evolution process of China's banking administrative monopoly, from the political system, the economic basis, This paper analyzes the reasons of banking administrative monopoly from four aspects: theoretical basis and institutional change preference. This paper focuses on drawing lessons from the ISCP framework constructed by Yu Liangchun and combining with the characteristics of banking industry to set up a three-level index which can reflect the level of banking administrative monopoly. The deep analysis shows that the degree of administrative monopoly in domestic banking is deep. Because this article defines the administrative monopoly as the illegal act defined by the anti-monopoly law, This paper analyzes the negative effects of administrative monopoly on China's economy from the macro and micro aspects. Finally, according to the above systematic analysis, through drawing lessons from the successful anti-monopoly experience of the international banking industry, Then it provides corresponding suggestions and strategies for the reform of domestic banking and the perfection of monopoly rules.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F832

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡德寶;;行政壟斷危害及其治理的福利經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];中國(guó)物價(jià);2015年06期

2 王業(yè)雯;;中國(guó)光伏產(chǎn)業(yè)的ISCP范式研究[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題探索;2015年05期

3 邱兆祥;劉浩;安世友;;行政壟斷影響我國(guó)銀行業(yè)市場(chǎng)結(jié)構(gòu)的機(jī)理分析[J];金融研究;2015年02期

4 劉任重;魯東智;;商業(yè)銀行壟斷規(guī)制問題研究[J];特區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì);2014年02期

5 劉秀光;;如何解讀“打破銀行壟斷”[J];濟(jì)南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

6 孫方圓;;銀行消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)法律問題研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2013年05期

7 郭光耀;;銀行壟斷與經(jīng)濟(jì)波動(dòng)——基于RBC模型的擴(kuò)展研究[J];南方經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年04期

8 王丙輝;;論中國(guó)反壟斷法在銀行業(yè)的適用障礙及其完善機(jī)制[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年01期

9 唐衛(wèi);韋奇岐;余潔;李晴;許雯琪;;剖析銀行現(xiàn)狀,打破銀行壟斷[J];金融經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年02期

10 吳漢洪;姜艷慶;;對(duì)中國(guó)銀行業(yè)反壟斷問題的思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2012年11期

，

本文編號(hào)：1545934