發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-16 00:03

  本文選題：農(nóng)村信用社 + 不良債權(quán)評(píng)估��； 參考：《華北電力大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國市場經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和金融體制改革的深入,農(nóng)村信用社潛在的各種矛盾和問題也逐漸凸顯,尤其是信貸不良資產(chǎn)問題已經(jīng)成為農(nóng)村信用社發(fā)展的沉重負(fù)擔(dān),直接影響著信用社經(jīng)營效益和持續(xù)發(fā)展。那么合理處置信用社不良資產(chǎn)、防范化解農(nóng)村金融風(fēng)險(xiǎn),顯得尤為重要。值得關(guān)注的是,不良債權(quán)資產(chǎn)處置的核心問題是資產(chǎn)價(jià)值的評(píng)估問題,但目前我國農(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)評(píng)估體系仍不完善,評(píng)估方法較為粗略,忽視不良債權(quán)評(píng)估過程的模糊本性,過于注重定量指標(biāo)的評(píng)價(jià),忽視償債意愿等定性指標(biāo)的評(píng)價(jià)。 基于以上背景,本文試圖從我國農(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)評(píng)估特征與現(xiàn)狀的分析出發(fā),探索構(gòu)建一個(gè)符合我國農(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)資產(chǎn)特色的評(píng)估模型。 本文首先對(duì)我國農(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)評(píng)估的特征進(jìn)行詳細(xì)分析,提出其在評(píng)估對(duì)象、評(píng)估過程、評(píng)估因素、評(píng)估主體等方面存在的特殊性；其次,對(duì)目前我國普遍采用的評(píng)估模型的現(xiàn)狀及問題進(jìn)行深入研究,特別對(duì)評(píng)估方法與評(píng)估指標(biāo)進(jìn)行分析；隨后,基于對(duì)農(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)評(píng)估的特征與問題分析,本人提出多層次模糊評(píng)價(jià)法：建立符合我國農(nóng)村信用社特色的多層次不良債權(quán)評(píng)估指標(biāo)體系,采用層次分析和專家評(píng)價(jià)相結(jié)合的方法確定各指標(biāo)的權(quán)重,采用模糊評(píng)價(jià)法對(duì)不良債權(quán)價(jià)值進(jìn)行綜合評(píng)估,該模型對(duì)于解決不良債權(quán)評(píng)估中指標(biāo)權(quán)重的確定問題、評(píng)價(jià)過程中的定性問題以及模糊性現(xiàn)象的處理問題,有著其他評(píng)價(jià)方法所無法比擬的優(yōu)勢；最后,通過案例分析對(duì)該評(píng)估模型進(jìn)行了實(shí)例分析。 本文提出的基于多層次模糊評(píng)價(jià)法的農(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)評(píng)估模型突出農(nóng)村信用社的特點(diǎn)、考慮到不良債權(quán)評(píng)估的特殊性,具有較強(qiáng)的理論與實(shí)踐意義,能夠?yàn)檗r(nóng)村信用社不良債權(quán)處置與定價(jià)提供基礎(chǔ)與重要參考依據(jù),有利于提高農(nóng)村信用社的信用風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理水平,實(shí)現(xiàn)金融安全和社會(huì)信用建設(shè)的良性互動(dòng),促進(jìn)農(nóng)村金融運(yùn)行質(zhì)量和效益的提升。
[Abstract]:With the development of China's market economy and the deepening of financial system reform, the potential contradictions and problems of rural credit cooperatives have gradually become prominent, especially the problem of non-performing loans has become a heavy burden on the development of rural credit cooperatives. It directly affects the benefit and sustainable development of credit cooperatives. It is particularly important to deal with the bad assets of credit cooperatives and to prevent and defuse the rural financial risks. What is worth paying attention to is that the core problem of the disposition of non-performing credit assets is the evaluation of the value of assets, but at present, the evaluation system of non-performing loans of rural credit cooperatives in our country is still not perfect, and the evaluation method is relatively rough. The fuzzy nature of the evaluation process of non-performing creditor's rights is ignored, the evaluation of quantitative indexes and the evaluation of qualitative indexes such as willingness to repay debt are ignored too much. Based on the above background, this paper attempts to establish an evaluation model of the non-performing credit assets of rural credit cooperatives from the analysis of the characteristics and current situation of the non-performing credit evaluation of rural credit cooperatives in China. In this paper, the characteristics of non-performing credit evaluation of rural credit cooperatives in China are analyzed in detail, and the particularity of the evaluation object, evaluation process, evaluation factors, evaluation subject and so on are put forward. The current situation and problems of the commonly used evaluation model in our country are deeply studied, especially the evaluation method and evaluation index are analyzed. Then, based on the analysis of the characteristics and problems of the evaluation of non-performing credit in rural credit cooperatives, I put forward a multi-level fuzzy evaluation method: to establish a multi-level non-performing credit evaluation index system in line with the characteristics of rural credit cooperatives in China, and to determine the weight of each index by the combination of AHP and expert evaluation. The fuzzy evaluation method is used to evaluate the value of non-performing creditor's rights. The model can solve the problem of determining the index weight, the qualitative problem in the evaluation process and the treatment of fuzzy phenomenon in the evaluation of non-performing creditor's rights. It has the advantage that other evaluation methods can not compare. Finally, the case study is carried out to analyze the evaluation model. The model of non-performing credit evaluation of rural credit cooperatives, which is based on multi-level fuzzy evaluation method, highlights the characteristics of rural credit cooperatives, and takes into account the particularity of non-performing credit evaluation, so it has strong theoretical and practical significance. It can provide the basis and important reference basis for the disposal and pricing of non-performing credit rights of rural credit cooperatives, which is conducive to improving the level of credit risk management of rural credit cooperatives and realizing the positive interaction between financial security and social credit construction. We will promote the quality and efficiency of rural financial operations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華北電力大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：F832.35;F830.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 姜偉;不良資產(chǎn)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)定價(jià)的方法探析[J];中國創(chuàng)業(yè)投資與高科技;2004年08期

2 方武平,趙丹暉;對(duì)不良資產(chǎn)估價(jià)若干問題的探討[J];國有資產(chǎn)管理;2001年03期

3 曹艷紅;銀行不良資產(chǎn)定價(jià)與評(píng)估的探討[J];湖南有色金屬;2002年04期

4 婁崢嶸;金融不良債權(quán)價(jià)值評(píng)估思路[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2004年09期

5 劉新民,李玉強(qiáng),王培勛;農(nóng)村信用社不良貸款成因剖析[J];金融理論與實(shí)踐;2001年08期

6 宋清華;論不良貸款的定價(jià)問題[J];金融研究;2000年04期

7 謝平;中國農(nóng)村信用合作社體制改革的爭論[J];金融研究;2001年01期

8 李新章;改革與發(fā)展的成本:農(nóng)村信用社不良資產(chǎn)形成與處置[J];金融研究;2004年11期

9 曾建權(quán);層次分析法在確定企業(yè)家評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重中的應(yīng)用[J];南京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2004年01期

10 韓良;董越;;銀行不良資產(chǎn)的估價(jià)體系研究[J];南開經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2005年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2024253