發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-01-14 15:39

【摘要】：隨著全球金融危機(jī)的影響，國(guó)內(nèi)各地政府紛紛以提升產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力作為支撐經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展的核心動(dòng)力，在各地已有的高新技術(shù)科技園、專業(yè)鎮(zhèn)和產(chǎn)業(yè)園等產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展的基礎(chǔ)上，如何形成持續(xù)發(fā)展的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力成為當(dāng)前研究關(guān)注的重點(diǎn)，將產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的可持續(xù)發(fā)展能力放到政府的介入程度和方式所產(chǎn)生的影響程度中來研究，有利于加深對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)創(chuàng)新、集群效應(yīng)的理解，以及對(duì)集群可持續(xù)發(fā)展和企業(yè)自主創(chuàng)新提供更加有效的引導(dǎo)與管理。 本研究以產(chǎn)業(yè)集群、政府政策、創(chuàng)新型城市等理論為基礎(chǔ)，以轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)中的廣東省專業(yè)鎮(zhèn)這一典型產(chǎn)業(yè)集群載體和相關(guān)產(chǎn)業(yè)為研究對(duì)象，在考慮政府角色和產(chǎn)業(yè)集群持續(xù)發(fā)展兩個(gè)方面，采用橫向（不同地區(qū)）和縱向（不同時(shí)期）的對(duì)比研究、深度訪談和結(jié)構(gòu)方程式等方法和技術(shù)，對(duì)政府引導(dǎo)、產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展、集群效應(yīng)和創(chuàng)新能力進(jìn)行實(shí)證研究，重點(diǎn)分析研究產(chǎn)業(yè)集群可持續(xù)發(fā)展所需要的內(nèi)部和外部因素，政府介入對(duì)市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)機(jī)制下的集群成員是否有影響以及有何影響，政府角色在產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展中后期的作用，政府政策對(duì)于不同集群成員發(fā)展有何影響，如何通過政府的引導(dǎo)，幫助集群成員形成適應(yīng)市場(chǎng)優(yōu)勝劣汰機(jī)制的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力等。 本研究從政府功能定位的視角，綜合考慮企業(yè)創(chuàng)新能力、集群競(jìng)爭(zhēng)效應(yīng)和政府介入影響的關(guān)系，以及政府介入對(duì)于產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的調(diào)節(jié)作用，探索建立一個(gè)新的實(shí)證研究框架。本研究將在分析集群內(nèi)和集群外的企業(yè)在競(jìng)爭(zhēng)能力和創(chuàng)新能力是否存在明顯差異的同時(shí)，研究政府行為在集群中后期發(fā)展中的影響，既有利于促進(jìn)在產(chǎn)業(yè)集群和企業(yè)創(chuàng)新方面政府功能理論研究的拓展和深化，也有利于理解集群可持續(xù)發(fā)展所需要的相關(guān)政策環(huán)境和制度。我國(guó)正處在重要的轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期,經(jīng)濟(jì)制度、政治制度等均處在一個(gè)變革狀態(tài)之下，所以地方政府在不斷變革的過程對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)制度、政治制度的態(tài)度，以及由此而推行的政府行為對(duì)產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚的形成乃至發(fā)展都有著極為重要的意義。從政府功能定位的視角探索產(chǎn)業(yè)集群可持續(xù)發(fā)展的影響因子和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)效應(yīng)，在相關(guān)研究中尚未涉及深入，研究處于轉(zhuǎn)型升級(jí)的中堅(jiān)地區(qū)（廣東）產(chǎn)業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力、企業(yè)創(chuàng)新與政府行為的關(guān)系，并將其研究結(jié)果與海內(nèi)外成熟的集群地區(qū)（如意大利、臺(tái)灣新竹）進(jìn)行比較分析，期望產(chǎn)生新的理論發(fā)現(xiàn)和提出具有建設(shè)性的對(duì)策建議。
[Abstract]:With the impact of the global financial crisis, local governments have taken the promotion of industrial competitiveness as the core power to support economic and social development. On the basis of the development of industrial clusters such as high-tech science and technology parks, specialized towns and industrial parks, the local governments have taken the promotion of industrial competitiveness as the core power to support economic and social development. How to form the competitiveness of sustainable development has become the focus of current research. It is beneficial to deepen the innovation of industry to study the sustainable development ability of industrial cluster in the influence degree of government intervention degree and mode. The understanding of cluster effect, as well as providing more effective guidance and management to the sustainable development of cluster and independent innovation of enterprises. Based on the theories of industrial cluster, government policy and innovative city, this study takes Guangdong Province specialized Town, which is a typical industrial cluster carrier and related industries, as the research object. In consideration of the role of government and the sustainable development of industrial clusters, the comparative study of horizontal (different regions) and vertical (different periods), in-depth interviews and structural equations are adopted to guide the government and industrial development. Empirical research on cluster effect and innovation ability focuses on the internal and external factors needed for the sustainable development of industrial clusters, and whether or not government intervention has an impact on cluster members under the market competition mechanism. The role of government in the development of industrial clusters, the impact of government policies on the development of different cluster members, how to help cluster members to form competitive power to adapt to the survival of the fittest mechanism through the guidance of the government. From the perspective of government function orientation, this study comprehensively considers the relationship among enterprise innovation ability, cluster competition effect and government intervention influence, as well as the regulatory role of government intervention on industrial competitiveness, and explores the establishment of a new empirical research framework. This study will analyze whether there are obvious differences in competitiveness and innovation ability of enterprises within and outside clusters, and at the same time, study the impact of government behavior on the development of clusters in the middle and later stages. It is not only helpful to promote the development and deepening of the theory of government function in industrial cluster and enterprise innovation, but also to understand the relevant policy environment and system needed for the sustainable development of cluster. Our country is in an important period of transition, the economic system and political system are all in a state of change, so the attitude of local governments to the economic system and political system is constantly changing. And the government behavior is of great significance to the formation and development of industrial agglomeration. From the perspective of government function orientation, this paper explores the influence factors and competitive effects of the sustainable development of industrial clusters, which has not been involved in the relevant studies, and studies the industrial competitiveness of the core areas (Guangdong) in the transformation and upgrading. The relationship between enterprise innovation and government behavior is analyzed and compared with the mature clusters at home and abroad (such as Italy, Hsinchu, Taiwan). It is expected to produce new theoretical findings and constructive suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華南理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F127;D630

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙全超;汪波;王舉穎;;基于創(chuàng)新型產(chǎn)業(yè)集群的創(chuàng)新型城市政府治理機(jī)制研究[J];北京理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 朱邦耀;羅有賢;李利平;;臺(tái)灣新竹工業(yè)園的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新措施及對(duì)重慶高新區(qū)發(fā)展的啟示[J];重慶交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期

3 張國(guó)亭;;政府介入產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展的理論依據(jù)[J];科技和產(chǎn)業(yè);2009年06期

4 王其和;夏晶;王婉娟;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群生命周期與政府行為關(guān)系研究[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年20期

5 方永恒;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群政策的困境與出路[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年01期

6 劉昱;;論創(chuàng)新集群發(fā)展中的后發(fā)國(guó)家政府行為及政策選擇[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年04期

7 黃國(guó)良;推進(jìn)產(chǎn)業(yè)集群發(fā)展的政府作用[J];發(fā)展研究;2005年03期

8 任壽根;新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集群與制度分割——以上海外高橋保稅區(qū)新興產(chǎn)業(yè)集群為例[J];管理世界;2004年02期

9 丘海雄,徐建牛;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群技術(shù)創(chuàng)新中的地方政府行為[J];管理世界;2004年10期

10 蔣東仁;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集群成長(zhǎng)中政府功能定位與政府行為的內(nèi)生性[J];管理現(xiàn)代化;2006年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 邊云;基于可持續(xù)發(fā)展的高科技產(chǎn)業(yè)集群治理研究[D];濟(jì)南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2408838