發(fā)布時間：2019-05-17 20:56

【摘要】：以發(fā)展水平大致相當(dāng)?shù)钠皆�縣(延津縣)和山區(qū)縣(寶豐縣)為例,基于1972、1990、2013年聚落斑塊數(shù)據(jù),運用景觀格局指數(shù)、統(tǒng)計分析等方法對兩縣聚落空間演變進行對比分析表明:1兩縣聚落均呈集聚分布,平原縣聚落逐漸趨向隨機分布,而山區(qū)縣集聚趨勢逐漸增強。2景觀指數(shù)顯示兩縣聚落斑塊面積占比變動相似,而平均斑塊面積平原縣明顯大于山區(qū)縣,且增長程度較大;平原縣聚落斑塊數(shù)量、密度均持續(xù)減小,而山區(qū)縣持續(xù)變大;平原縣最大斑塊指數(shù)增加明顯,而山區(qū)縣有所下降;聚落鄰近程度均在增強,但山區(qū)縣表現(xiàn)更突出;1990年代前聚落擴展明顯快于1990年代后,這一差異在山區(qū)縣更為明顯。3平原縣中間位序聚落較多,聚落規(guī)模分布趨于集中,各等級規(guī)模聚落擴展差異較小;而山區(qū)縣聚落規(guī)模分布趨于分散,中等規(guī)模聚落相對較少。4兩縣聚落擴展均快于人口增長,但1990年代后山區(qū)縣兩者趨于一致;經(jīng)濟發(fā)展不能很好地解釋兩縣聚落擴展的差異;地形直接造成兩縣聚落分布模式和景觀指數(shù)的不同;交通對平原縣聚落的影響較山區(qū)更為顯著;鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)點對山區(qū)縣聚落的影響更為復(fù)雜,其輻射帶動作用均有待進一步加強。
[Abstract]:Taking Pingyuan County (Yanjin County) and Mountain County (Baofeng County) with the same level of development as examples, based on the data of settlement patches in 1972, 1990 and 2013, the landscape pattern index was used. The spatial evolution of settlements in the two counties is compared and analyzed by statistical analysis and other methods. The results show that: (1) the settlements in the two counties are concentrated and distributed, and the settlements in Pingyuan County tend to be randomly distributed. However, the agglomeration trend of mountain counties increased gradually. 2 the landscape index showed that the proportion of settlement patch area in the two counties was similar, while the average patch area in Pingyuan County was significantly larger than that in mountainous counties, and the degree of increase was greater. The number and density of settlement patches in Pingyuan County continued to decrease, while the mountain counties continued to increase, the maximum patch index in Pingyuan County increased obviously, while the mountain counties decreased, and the neighborhood degree of settlements was increased, but the mountain counties were more prominent. The expansion of settlement before 1990s is obviously faster than that after 1990s, and this difference is more obvious in mountainous counties. (3) there are more intermediate order settlements in plain counties, the distribution of settlement scale tends to be concentrated, and the difference of settlement expansion in each grade is small; However, the scale distribution of settlement in mountainous counties tends to be scattered, and the settlement in medium scale is relatively small. (4) the expansion of settlements in the two counties is faster than that in population growth, but after the 1990s, the two counties tend to be consistent, and the economic development can not explain the difference of settlement expansion between the two counties. The terrain directly causes the difference of settlement distribution pattern and landscape index between the two counties; the influence of traffic on the settlement in Pingyuan County is more significant than that in the mountain area; the influence of the township point on the settlement in the mountain county is more complex, and its radiation driving effect needs to be further strengthened.
【作者單位】： 河南大學(xué)環(huán)境與規(guī)劃學(xué)院;河南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)中原經(jīng)濟區(qū)三化協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展河南省協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;河南大學(xué)黃河文明與可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究中心;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項目(41471117) 教育部人文社科重點研究基地重大項目(16JJD770021) 河南省軟科學(xué)重大項目(152400410098)
【分類號】：K901.8

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李建勇;;米脂窯洞古城民居聚落形態(tài)的價值分析[J];新西部(下半月);2007年09期

2 王剛;周學(xué)紅;聶康才;;銀川平原典型聚落形態(tài)研究[J];四川建筑;2011年06期

3 施瑛;潘瑩;;廣府民系、越海民系水鄉(xiāng)傳統(tǒng)聚落形態(tài)比較(下)[J];農(nóng)業(yè)考古;2011年04期

4 鄔建華;楊樹文;;喀什聚落的形態(tài)研究之啟示[J];昌吉學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年01期

5 劉海泳,顧朝林;北京流動人口聚落的形態(tài)、結(jié)構(gòu)與功能[J];地理科學(xué);1999年06期

6 魯西奇;;漢宋間長江中游地區(qū)的鄉(xiāng)村聚落形態(tài)及其演變[J];歷史地理;2008年00期

7 陳淳;;聚落形態(tài)與城市起源研究[J];都市文化研究;2007年01期

8 魯西奇;韓軻軻;;散村的形成及其演變——以江漢平原腹地的鄉(xiāng)村聚落形態(tài)及其演變?yōu)橹行腫J];中國歷史地理論叢;2011年04期

9 魯西奇;;散村與集村:傳統(tǒng)中國的鄉(xiāng)村聚落形態(tài)及其演變[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年04期

10 李紅;;聚落的起源與演變[J];長春師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2010年06期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 陳勇;;四川西部山區(qū)民族聚落生態(tài)分區(qū)研究[A];首屆中國民族聚居區(qū)建筑文化遺產(chǎn)國際研討會論文集[C];2010年

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 記者 杜娟;上海古輿圖顯示獨特史料價值[N];社會科學(xué)報;2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 譚明;吳堡窯洞古城聚落形態(tài)的研究與保護[D];西安美術(shù)學(xué)院;2009年

，

本文編號：2479401