發(fā)布時間：2018-06-02 06:22

  本文選題：壬辰戰(zhàn)爭 + 內(nèi)附��； 參考：《史學(xué)集刊》2017年04期

【摘要】：壬辰戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)后,朝鮮迅速潰敗,國王決定"北渡"內(nèi)附,并采取對內(nèi)命世子權(quán)攝國事及設(shè)立分朝,對外向明請援等措施為內(nèi)附做準(zhǔn)備。明朝同意朝鮮國王有條件地內(nèi)附。但在此過程中,情況發(fā)生一定變化,國王不得已放棄內(nèi)附。國王的內(nèi)附雖然沒有實現(xiàn),但其過程的展開仍對朝鮮政局及壬辰戰(zhàn)局產(chǎn)生深遠(yuǎn)影響。梳理朝鮮內(nèi)附的過程及明朝的應(yīng)對,一方面可以發(fā)現(xiàn)明朝在對外交往中具備清晰的疆界觀念,并予以恪守,這與近代殖民體系下的"宗主國"與"附屬國"的關(guān)系有本質(zhì)的不同;另一方面則說明中朝之間宗藩關(guān)系的主流之外亦有一種看似親密,而實則疏遠(yuǎn)的潛流。
[Abstract]:After the outbreak of the nonchen War, North Korea was defeated quickly, and the king decided to "cross the north" and took measures such as taking charge of the state affairs, setting up separate dynasties, and requesting assistance from the Ming Dynasty to prepare for the internal attachment. The Ming Dynasty agreed to the conditional attachment of the Korean King. But in this process, the situation has changed, the King had to abandon the attachment. Although the king's inner attachment has not been realized, its process still has a profound influence on the Korean political situation and nonchen war situation. By combing the process attached to the DPRK and the response of the Ming Dynasty, on the one hand, we can find that the Ming Dynasty had a clear concept of the boundary in its foreign exchanges and adhered to it. This is essentially different from the relationship between "Suzerain" and "subordinate state" under the modern colonial system, on the other hand, it shows that there is a kind of submersible current which appears to be close, but alienated, in addition to the mainstream of the Suzerain-vassal relationship between China and North Korea.
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K312.34

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 ;校園歌聲2009征稿啟事[J];校園歌聲;2009年02期

，

本文編號：1967752