發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-24 17:48

  本文選題：《水滸傳》 + 袁無(wú)涯本　； 參考：《福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：在《水滸傳》研究中,一般認(rèn)為容與堂本刊刻于袁無(wú)涯本之前。最早對(duì)此提出疑議的是章培恒先生,并對(duì)此給出一些旁證。美國(guó)哥倫比亞大學(xué)藏本《讀升庵集》扉頁(yè)之出版告白是解決這一問(wèn)題的重要線索,但向來(lái)未受重視。以《讀升庵集》扉頁(yè)之告白結(jié)合相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行研究,可知袁無(wú)涯原刊本的刊刻時(shí)間早于容與堂本,大約刊刻于萬(wàn)歷三十七年(1609)至萬(wàn)歷三十八年(1610)之間,并且可以確定容與堂本是葉晝偽托李贄的評(píng)點(diǎn)本。同時(shí),通過(guò)現(xiàn)存多種版本的�？�,可知現(xiàn)存袁無(wú)涯本并非原刻本,其中評(píng)點(diǎn)已非完全的李卓吾評(píng)點(diǎn)原貌;現(xiàn)存大滌余人序本保留了李卓吾評(píng)本的原貌,而大滌余人序本的祖本是袁無(wú)涯刊刻的李卓吾評(píng)點(diǎn)《水滸傳》之原刊本。
[Abstract]:In the study of Outlaws of the Marsh, it is generally believed that Rong and Tang Ben were engraved before Yuan's boundless book. Mr. Zhang Peiheng was the first to raise doubts about this, and gave some circumstantial evidence. The publication of the title page of Columbia University's Collection, "Reading an album", is an important clue to solve this problem, but it has never been paid much attention to. Through the study of the confession on the title page of "Reading the Collection of Sheng'an" and the relevant documents, it can be seen that the original edition of Yuan Wuya was printed earlier than Rong and Tang, and was about printed between 1609 (37 years of Wanli) and 1610 (38 years of Wanli). And it can be determined that Rong-Heisang is the comment book of Ye-day-pseudo-Toto-Li Zhi. At the same time, through the current collation of various versions, we can see that the existing Yuan Wu-Ya Ben is not the original engraved version, in which Li Zhuowu's comments on the original appearance are not complete, and that the extant Da Li Yu's preface has preserved the original appearance of Li Zhuo-wu 's commentary. And the ancestor of the preface of Da-Li Yu is the original edition of Li Zhuowu's comment on Water margin.
，

本文編號(hào)：1929984