發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-13 01:24

  本文選題：衛(wèi)道士 + 裝修工�。� 參考：《學(xué)�！�2017年05期

【摘要】：現(xiàn)代民主的理論家人數(shù)眾多,類(lèi)型不外衛(wèi)道士、裝修工與顛覆者三種。衛(wèi)道士循政治哲學(xué)進(jìn)路對(duì)現(xiàn)代民主進(jìn)行了有力的價(jià)值辯護(hù)、制度勾畫(huà)和歷史劃界,從而清晰區(qū)分了現(xiàn)代民主與古代民主的界限,民主和反民主的實(shí)質(zhì)差異。裝修工對(duì)現(xiàn)代民主頗有不滿(mǎn),但并不準(zhǔn)備從結(jié)構(gòu)上挑戰(zhàn)民主制度,而是從更為完善的民主期待切入,試圖克制流行于現(xiàn)代的民主政制的弊端,并弘揚(yáng)這一政體的長(zhǎng)處。顛覆者由拒斥民主或?qū)で蟾鼉?yōu)民主的人士構(gòu)成,他們斷定現(xiàn)代民主是虛偽不實(shí)的,嘗試以專(zhuān)制或"真正"民主取而代之。現(xiàn)代民主的理論家一直與現(xiàn)代民主的曲折進(jìn)程聯(lián)袂出現(xiàn)。面對(duì)顛覆者連續(xù)不斷的強(qiáng)力攻擊,裝修工似乎不足抵擋,而衛(wèi)道士的申辯也明顯需要再次刷新。
[Abstract]:Modern democratic theorists have a large number of types, such as Taoists, decorators and subverters. The Taoists defended modern democracy by the way of political philosophy and drew a clear distinction between modern democracy and ancient democracy and the essential difference between democracy and anti-democracy. The decorators are unhappy with modern democracy, but are not prepared to challenge it structurally, but rather to try to overcome the ills of modern democracy and to promote its strengths by looking forward to a more perfect democracy. The subversive is made up of people who reject democracy or seek better democracy. They conclude that modern democracy is hypocritical and try to replace it with autocracy or "real" democracy. The theorists of modern democracy have always appeared together with the tortuous process of modern democracy. In the face of subversive constant powerful attacks, decorator seems to be insufficient to resist, and the defense also obviously need to refresh.
【作者單位】： 清華大學(xué)政治系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D082
，

本文編號(hào)：2011993