發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-03 11:48

  本文選題：復(fù)古思潮 + 乾隆�。� 參考：《中國音樂學(xué)》2017年03期

【摘要】：多年來取得重大成果的"四庫學(xué)"研究主要集中在文獻(xiàn)學(xué)、史學(xué)和文學(xué)等領(lǐng)域,音樂學(xué)領(lǐng)域較少。通過相關(guān)史料的檢索和解讀可知,乾隆和四庫館臣們興起了一場"琴樂復(fù)古思潮",批判琴樂為"俗""淫""靡""非古",提出"一字一音""主散聲""尚齊撮"等演奏標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。關(guān)于為何會(huì)要對(duì)琴樂進(jìn)行如此嚴(yán)苛而荒謬的批評(píng),乾隆之言前后矛盾,四庫館臣們則"萬馬齊喑"。本文聯(lián)系《四庫全書》時(shí)代的政治背景和文化政策,提出"名為復(fù)古、實(shí)為禁錮"之思考,求證于方家。
[Abstract]:The study of "four libraries", which has made great achievements for many years, is mainly concentrated in the fields of philology, history and literature, and there are few fields of musicology. Through the retrieval and interpretation of relevant historical data, it is known that the Emperor Qianlong and the officials of the four libraries have sprang up a "music to the ancients", criticizing the music for "vulgarity", "popular" and "non ancient", and putting forward "one word one sound" "main sound", "Shang Qi" As for the strict and absurd criticism of the piano music, the words of the Emperor Qianlong are incompatible and the officials of the four libraries are "silent".
【作者單位】： 湖南師范大學(xué)音樂學(xué)院;
【基金】：2015年度教育部人文社科研究青年基金項(xiàng)目“游藝:清代古琴文化生態(tài)系統(tǒng)研究”(15YJC760098)階段成果
【分類號(hào)】：J609.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2093533