發(fā)布時間：2024-06-01 13:01

　　本文運用批評性語篇分析、合作原則和目的原則,對薩達姆在審判過程中的法庭應(yīng)答語進行研究。作者從詞匯分類、人稱代詞和情態(tài)等方面對其應(yīng)答形式進行了分析,進而指出薩達姆是如何運用語言策略來實現(xiàn)其政治目的的。 此項研究把批評性語篇分析和法律語言學(xué)結(jié)合起來,拓展了相關(guān)研究范圍;分析了法庭應(yīng)答語中的語言策略及其作用,旨在提高人們的批評性語言意識。希望此項研究能夠?qū)χ袊�的法律工作者具有一定的參考價值。此外,本研究對英語教學(xué)具有一定的借鑒意義。作者建議在英語專業(yè)教學(xué)中介紹法律英語和法律語言學(xué)的相關(guān)知識。

【文章頁數(shù)】：96 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
內(nèi)容提要
Synopsis
Introduction
Chapter 1 Literature Review
    1.1 Forensic Linguistics
    1.2 Courtroom Responses
        1.2.1 The Socio-linguistic Approach
        1.2.2 The Pragmatic Approach
        1.2.3 The Discourse Analysis Approach
        1.2.4 The Rhetorical Approach
    1.3 Critical Discourse Analysis
        1.3.1 The Origin of CDA
        1.3.2 The Development of CDA
        1.3.3 The Limitations of CDA
    1.4 Summary
Chapter 2 Methodology
    2.1 Data Collection and Sample Selection
    2.2 Analytic Devices of Critical Discourse Analysis
        2.2.1 Lexical Classification
        2.2.2 Pronominal Selection
        2.2.3 Modality
    2.3 The Violation of the Cooperative Principle
    2.4 The Application of the Principle of Goal Analysis
    2.5.Summary
Chapter 3 Data Analysis and Implications
    3.1. Background Information
    3.2.F orms of indirect responses
        3.2.1 Correcting the judge’s remarks
        3.2.2.C larifying the Facts
        3.2.3.G iving Irrelevant Responses
    3.3.R esponding Strategies
        3.3.1.R epetition
        3.3.2.0ver-informative Responses
        3.3.3.A gitation
        3.3.4.E mphasis
    3.4. Implications
        3.4.1. Implications for English Teaching and learning
        3.4.2 Implications for the legal personnel
    3.5. Summary
Conclusion
References
Appendixes
Abstract (Chinese)
Abstract (English)
Acknowledgments
導(dǎo)師及作者簡介



本文編號：3985930