發(fā)布時間：2018-01-28 18:02

  本文關鍵詞： 監(jiān)獄 行政處罰 行政處罰自由裁量權　出處：《湖南大學》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：監(jiān)獄行政處罰自由裁量權，是指監(jiān)獄在沒有法律法規(guī)明確規(guī)定的情況下，為實現(xiàn)對服刑人員的教育改造，根據(jù)法律、法規(guī)所確定的原則、目的、精神、范圍和幅度，結(jié)合服刑人員的個體情況，對服刑人員的行政處罰作出具體靈活處理的權力。如何對監(jiān)獄行政處罰自由裁量權進行法律規(guī)制已經(jīng)成為我國行政法學理論與司法實踐的一個重要問題。目前，監(jiān)獄行政處罰自由裁量權在運用過程中，存在被濫用的現(xiàn)象，其濫用的表現(xiàn)主要是：考慮不相關因素；疏忽相關因素；裁量顯失公正；未能體現(xiàn)行政程序法的獨立價值。其一旦被監(jiān)獄所濫用，將會產(chǎn)生破壞正常的監(jiān)管秩序、降低監(jiān)獄行政執(zhí)法的公信力、侵害罪犯的合法權益等諸多危害。造成濫用的原因是多方面的：對監(jiān)獄采取行政處罰的思想認識有偏差；監(jiān)獄行政處罰自由裁量權過大；監(jiān)獄行政處罰適用條件及程序不完善；缺乏有效的監(jiān)督機制等等。因此，我國應該盡快加強對監(jiān)獄行政處罰自由裁量權的法律規(guī)制：一是完善監(jiān)獄行政立法，主要是完善實體立法和程序立法；二是以合理性原則控制監(jiān)獄行政處罰自由裁量行為，確保自由裁量權的行使必須符合法律的目的，法律解釋必須符合法律的原意，考慮相關因素排除不相關因素，，符合公正的標準；三是完善監(jiān)督制約機制，建立多元化的監(jiān)獄監(jiān)督主體，實現(xiàn)監(jiān)獄監(jiān)督內(nèi)容的法定化，完善監(jiān)督職權手段和方式。
[Abstract]:The discretion of prison administrative punishment refers to the prison in the absence of laws and regulations clearly stipulated in the case, in order to achieve the educational reform of prisoners, according to the principles, purposes, spirit determined by the law and regulations. Scope and scope, combined with the individual situation of the prisoners. How to regulate the discretion of prison administrative punishment has become an important issue in the theory and judicial practice of administrative law in our country. In the process of applying the discretion of prison administrative punishment, there exists the phenomenon of abuse, the main manifestation of which is: considering the irrelevant factors; Negligence related factors; Discretion is unfair; The failure to reflect the independent value of the administrative procedure law. Once it is abused by the prison, it will destroy the normal supervision order and reduce the credibility of the prison administrative law enforcement. Many harm such as infringing on criminal's legitimate rights and interests. The reason that causes abuse is many aspects: to the thought that prison takes administrative punishment to have a deviation; The discretion of prison administrative punishment is too large; The applicable conditions and procedures of prison administrative punishment are not perfect; Therefore, our country should strengthen the legal regulation of the discretion of the prison administrative punishment as soon as possible: first, perfect the prison administrative legislation, mainly improve the substantive legislation and procedural legislation; Second, the principle of rationality to control the discretion of prison administrative punishment, to ensure that the exercise of discretion must conform to the purpose of the law, legal interpretation must conform to the original intent of the law. Take into account the relevant factors to exclude the irrelevant factors and meet the fair standards; The third is to perfect the supervision and restriction mechanism, to establish a pluralistic prison supervision subject, to realize the legalization of prison supervision content, and to perfect the means and methods of supervision authority.
【學位授予單位】：湖南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.7;D922.11

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 雍艦;;美國監(jiān)獄行刑制度的主要特征及發(fā)展趨勢[J];中國司法;2006年04期

2 梁運娟;;解析行政公正原則[J];法制與社會;2010年06期

3 王武嶺,馬立成;行政自由裁量權若干問題探析[J];河北大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2000年06期

4 河北省法制研究中心課題組;;行政裁量基準制度研究[J];河北法學;2010年04期

5 江凌;;第八講:行政處罰自由裁量權及其規(guī)范[J];中國水利;2009年20期

6 姜明安;;論行政裁量的自我規(guī)制[J];行政法學研究;2012年01期

7 司久貴;行政自由裁量權若干問題探討[J];行政法學研究;1998年02期

8 袁慶東，馬蘇春;論行政自由裁量權及其合理運行[J];徐州師范學院學報;1996年04期

9 陳志先;;規(guī)范行政處罰自由裁量權的探討[J];中國農(nóng)村衛(wèi)生事業(yè)管理;2009年08期

10 連堯斌,馮清;控制行政自由裁量 提高行政執(zhí)法水平[J];中國行政管理;2000年04期

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 郝場生;論中國監(jiān)獄的人權保障[D];安徽大學;2006年

本文編號：1471172