發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-04 04:35

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 監(jiān)督 網(wǎng)絡(luò) 網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督 司法審判　出處：《河北師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著信息社會(huì)的來臨，網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督與司法審判在實(shí)踐中發(fā)生沖突的情況成為關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。司法權(quán)是一種裁判權(quán)，最終目的是維護(hù)社會(huì)公正。保證司法公正是司法改革中反復(fù)著重探討的問題，對(duì)司法審判進(jìn)行有效的監(jiān)督是保證司法公正的一個(gè)重要手段。由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)具有及時(shí)性、廣泛性、高效性等特點(diǎn)，網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督逐漸成為社會(huì)大眾監(jiān)督司法公正的一個(gè)重要手段，，是當(dāng)前被公認(rèn)的一種快捷且行之有效的監(jiān)督手段。另一方面，近年來，隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)對(duì)司法案件進(jìn)行監(jiān)督評(píng)論現(xiàn)象的不斷增多，很多學(xué)者認(rèn)為網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督一定程度上妨礙了司法獨(dú)立和司法公正。但筆者通過調(diào)查研究認(rèn)為，網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督在我國(guó)的積極作用遠(yuǎn)大于消極影響，網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督不但不會(huì)成為妨礙司法獨(dú)立的因素，而能夠成為保障司法公正的一個(gè)重要手段。對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督不應(yīng)該處處限制，而應(yīng)該思考如何運(yùn)用法律手段確保網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督充分發(fā)揮作用，建立起網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督與司法審判的良性互動(dòng)，最大程度促進(jìn)司法公正。 全文共分三部分，第一部分主要是對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督的概念進(jìn)行了定位，并以此為切入點(diǎn)，指出網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督是當(dāng)前監(jiān)督權(quán)的新方式，是言論自由的新渠道，在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了我國(guó)司法審判的現(xiàn)狀。 第二部分重點(diǎn)分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督對(duì)司法審判的作用，并具體分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立和司法公正的關(guān)系。提出本文主要論點(diǎn)，即網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督不是妨礙司法獨(dú)立的因素，而是保證司法公正的一個(gè)重要措施。 第三部分重點(diǎn)分析了網(wǎng)絡(luò)監(jiān)督與司法審判良性互動(dòng)的基礎(chǔ)，并從相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的完善、加強(qiáng)政府部門對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺(tái)的監(jiān)管、網(wǎng)絡(luò)媒體自身的道德建設(shè)、司法機(jī)關(guān)自身建設(shè)和應(yīng)建立起主動(dòng)應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制的角度進(jìn)行了論述。
[Abstract]:With the advent of the information society, the conflict between network supervision and judicial trial has become the focus of attention. Judicial power is a kind of adjudication power. The ultimate purpose is to maintain social justice. Ensuring judicial justice is a problem that has been repeatedly discussed in the judicial reform. Effective supervision of judicial trial is an important means to ensure judicial justice. Due to the characteristics of the network such as timeliness, universality, efficiency and so on. Network supervision has gradually become an important means for the public to supervise judicial justice. It is recognized as a fast and effective means of supervision. On the other hand, in recent years. With the increasing of online supervision and comment on judicial cases, many scholars think that network supervision hinders judicial independence and judicial justice to some extent. However, the author thinks through investigation and research. The positive role of network supervision in China is far greater than the negative impact, network supervision will not become an obstacle to the independence of the judiciary. And can become an important means to ensure judicial justice. Network supervision should not be limited everywhere, but should consider how to use legal means to ensure the full play of the role of network supervision. To establish a benign interaction between network supervision and judicial trial, and to promote judicial justice to the greatest extent. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the definition of network supervision, and points out that network supervision is a new way of supervision power and a new channel of freedom of speech. On this basis, it analyzes the current situation of judicial trial in China. The second part focuses on the role of network supervision in judicial trial, and concretely analyzes the relationship between network supervision and judicial independence and justice, and puts forward the main points of this paper. That is, network supervision is not an obstacle to judicial independence, but an important measure to ensure judicial justice. The third part focuses on the analysis of the basis of benign interaction between network supervision and judicial trial, and from the improvement of relevant laws and regulations, strengthen the supervision of government departments on the network platform, network media own moral construction. This paper discusses the construction of the judiciary itself and the establishment of the active coping mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 高一飛;;評(píng)重慶打黑行動(dòng)中的媒體與司法[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年04期

2 鄭成良;論法治理念與法律思維[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

3 賀衛(wèi)方;傳媒與司法三題[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年06期

4 徐顯明;何謂司法公正[J];文史哲;1999年06期

5 景漢朝;傳媒監(jiān)督與司法獨(dú)立的沖突與契合[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

6 羅昕;傳媒與司法關(guān)系的法學(xué)探討[J];新聞?dòng)浾?2000年05期

7 何家弘;司法公正論[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1999年02期

8 謝鵬程;關(guān)于從制度上保證司法公正的幾個(gè)問題[J];政治與法律;1999年03期

本文編號(hào)：1489340