發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-21 05:35

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 統(tǒng)一司法考試制度 不足 發(fā)展 完善 建議　出處：《西北大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2001年全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)通過(guò)了修訂《中華人民共和國(guó)法官法》、《中華人民共和國(guó)檢察官法》、《中華人民共和國(guó)律師法》的決議,并決定將原來(lái)的初任法官考試、初任檢察官考試、律師職業(yè)資格考試�？家荒�,統(tǒng)一司法考試于2002年進(jìn)行。自此,我國(guó)建立起了統(tǒng)一的法律職業(yè)資格考試制度(下文中稱統(tǒng)一司法考試制度)。 統(tǒng)一司法考試制度的確立在我國(guó)法治史上具有劃時(shí)代的意義。它的建立架起了法學(xué)教育和司法實(shí)踐之間的橋梁,將引導(dǎo)我國(guó)法學(xué)教育不斷完善,為我國(guó)法治建設(shè)選拔合格的法律人才,使我國(guó)法律職業(yè)共同體的構(gòu)建成為可能。 但統(tǒng)一司法考試實(shí)踐表明：它并沒(méi)有產(chǎn)生預(yù)期的效果,反而暴露出許多不足。比如報(bào)考條件要求不嚴(yán)導(dǎo)致“準(zhǔn)法律職業(yè)者”的綜合素質(zhì)參差不齊,考試模式及題型設(shè)置不合理,加劇法律職業(yè)人才的短缺,對(duì)法學(xué)教育造成的負(fù)面影響等問(wèn)題。針對(duì)以上問(wèn)題,本文在比較分析傳統(tǒng)大陸法系國(guó)家法律職業(yè)資格考試制度先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,就我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度的發(fā)展與完善提出建議。本文將分三部分進(jìn)行論述： 第一部分,對(duì)我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度9年實(shí)踐中暴露出的不足進(jìn)行分析。 第二部分,對(duì)傳統(tǒng)大陸法系國(guó)家法律職業(yè)資格考試制度從報(bào)考資格、考試模式和法律職業(yè)培訓(xùn)制度等幾個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了比較分析,以期對(duì)我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度的發(fā)展與完善提供有益的借鑒。 第三部分,針對(duì)我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度及其在實(shí)踐中暴露出的不足,在借鑒大陸法系國(guó)家法律職業(yè)資格考試制度先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度的發(fā)展與完善提出建議。
[Abstract]:In 2001, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress adopted a resolution amending the Law of the people's Republic of China on judges, the Law of the people's Republic of China on Public prosecutors, and the Law of the people's Republic of China on lawyers, and decided to examine the original initial judges, The initial public procurator examination, the lawyer profession qualification examination withdraws one year, the unified judicial examination is held in 2002. Since then, our country has established the unified legal profession qualification examination system (hereinafter referred to as the unified judicial examination system). The establishment of unified judicial examination system is of epoch-making significance in the history of the rule of law in our country. Its establishment has set up a bridge between legal education and judicial practice, which will lead to the continuous improvement of legal education in our country. The selection of qualified legal talents for the construction of our country's rule of law makes the construction of our legal profession community possible. However, the practice of unified judicial examination shows that: it does not produce the expected effect, but it exposes many shortcomings. For example, the lax requirements for registration conditions lead to the uneven comprehensive quality of "quasi-legal professionals". The examination mode and the question type setting are unreasonable, aggravate the shortage of the legal profession talented person, cause the negative influence to the law education and so on. Based on the comparative analysis of the advanced experience of the legal qualification examination system in the countries of the traditional continental law system, this paper puts forward some suggestions for the development and perfection of the unified judicial examination system in China. The first part analyzes the deficiency of our country's unified judicial examination system in 9 years' practice. In the second part, the author makes a comparative analysis of the legal qualification examination system in the countries of traditional continental law system from the aspects of registration qualification, examination mode and legal vocational training system, etc. In order to provide a useful reference for the development and improvement of the unified judicial examination system in China. The third part, in view of our country unifies the judicial examination system and its in the practice exposes the insufficiency, in drawing lessons from the continental law system country legal profession qualification examination system advanced experience foundation, This paper puts forward some suggestions on the development and perfection of the unified judicial examination system in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D90-4;D926.15

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳羽;法律職業(yè)共同體建構(gòu)的反思[J];北京郵電大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 趙云芬;司法考試制度及其價(jià)值分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年03期

3 丁相順;階段性考試模式與我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度的完善[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年09期

4 李袁婕;;司法考試與統(tǒng)一職前培訓(xùn)價(jià)值論[J];中國(guó)司法;2006年05期

5 李建偉;;本科法學(xué)教育、司法考試與法律職業(yè)共同體:關(guān)系架構(gòu)及其改革命題[J];中國(guó)司法;2007年09期

6 王雪青;趙輝;;執(zhí)業(yè)資格考試及格線確定的方法探討[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年03期

7 鄭永流;國(guó)家法律者自國(guó)家考試出——德國(guó)職業(yè)法律者培養(yǎng)和選拔模式一瞥[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年05期

8 諶洪果;法律思維:一種思維方式上的檢討[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

9 霍憲丹;關(guān)于構(gòu)建法律職業(yè)共同體的思考[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年05期

10 丁相順;司法考試制度模式比較與中國(guó)司法考試的制度創(chuàng)新[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1521147