發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-12 16:18

  本文選題：刑訊逼供 + 刑事訴訟��； 參考：《大連海事大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：應(yīng)當(dāng)說,刑訊逼供是一個(gè)老生常談的話題,只不過在古代社會(huì)這種野蠻的逼供方式是合法的,而現(xiàn)在則被法律所禁止,因?yàn)樗�所體現(xiàn)出的價(jià)值觀,和我國法治社會(huì)的內(nèi)在要求相悖。因?yàn)樾逃嵄乒┯卸喾矫娴牟焕�影�?不僅能對(duì)人身造成摧殘,同樣是對(duì)司法權(quán)威的褻瀆。最近幾年,刑訊逼供已經(jīng)引起了多方關(guān)注,因?yàn)樗�而產(chǎn)生的冤假錯(cuò)案并不鮮見,使很多無罪的人迫于壓力“認(rèn)罪”,很多真正有罪的人卻逍遙法外,這無疑讓廣大人民心寒,難免對(duì)法律的權(quán)威和公正產(chǎn)生質(zhì)疑�；�于此,有必要對(duì)刑訊逼供進(jìn)行探討,因?yàn)槠洳粌H有深刻的理論意義,同時(shí)具備應(yīng)有的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本篇論文由四章組成,具體包括以下幾方面：第一章是對(duì)刑訊逼供的理論分析。在這章中,對(duì)刑訊逼供的概念做出了界定,現(xiàn)階段很多學(xué)者對(duì)這一名詞有不同的理解和看法。本文結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)有的實(shí)際情況,再參考《聯(lián)合國反酷刑公約》中的有關(guān)規(guī)定,區(qū)分了酷刑和刑訊逼供的含義。第二章是對(duì)我國有關(guān)刑訊逼供法律現(xiàn)狀的描述,通過對(duì)現(xiàn)狀的分析,剖析在該領(lǐng)域立法存在的不足。這一章中,主要對(duì)我國修訂后的《中華人民共和國刑事訴訟法》(以下簡稱新《刑訴法》)中的有關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行了闡述,并將其和修訂前的刑事訴訟法進(jìn)行比較,最終分析了現(xiàn)在立法的不足和可能產(chǎn)生的危害。第三章則是針對(duì)第二章中存在的各類問題提出具體的完善對(duì)策和建議。具體包括以下幾方面：通過借鑒西方發(fā)達(dá)國家的經(jīng)驗(yàn),指出要強(qiáng)化司法人員和執(zhí)法人員的人權(quán)觀念和個(gè)人素質(zhì)；注意有關(guān)法律制度的完善,如無罪推定制度以及非法證據(jù)排除機(jī)制等；建立完善的救濟(jì)制度,如損害賠償制度、加大違法逼供的查處力度等。第四章則結(jié)合實(shí)際對(duì)司法實(shí)踐中禁止刑訊逼供規(guī)定適用提出了建議。 本論文的撰寫工作是在閱讀中外有關(guān)文獻(xiàn)的基礎(chǔ)上完成的,在論文的寫作過程中運(yùn)用了比較分析法、歷史研究法等方法,重點(diǎn)研究了如何避免刑訊逼供情形發(fā)生的具體方法和途徑,期望通過本論文的撰寫,能夠?yàn)樵缛障�除“刑訊逼供”盡綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:It should be said that extorting confessions by torture is a commonplace topic, except that in ancient society this barbaric method of extracting confessions was legal, and is now prohibited by law because of the values it embodies. It runs counter to the inherent requirements of our country's society of rule of law. Because extorting confessions by torture has many adverse effects, it can not only destroy the person, but also blaspheme the judicial authority. In recent years, extorting confessions by torture has attracted much attention, because the cases of falsehood and error caused by torture are not uncommon. As a result, many innocent people are forced to "confess their guilt", while many truly guilty people go unpunished. This undoubtedly makes the people at large cold. It is inevitable to question the authority and justice of the law. Based on this, it is necessary to explore the extortion of confession by torture, because it not only has profound theoretical significance, but also has due practical significance. This thesis consists of four chapters, including the following aspects: the first chapter is the theoretical analysis of extorting confessions by torture. In this chapter, the concept of extorting confessions by torture is defined. According to the actual situation of our country and the relevant provisions of the UN Convention against torture, this paper distinguishes the meaning of torture from extorting confessions by torture. The second chapter describes the current situation of the law of extorting confessions by torture in our country. Through the analysis of the current situation, it analyzes the shortcomings of legislation in this field. In this chapter, the relevant provisions of the revised Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the new Criminal procedure Law) are mainly expounded, and compared with the revised Criminal procedure Law. Finally, it analyzes the deficiency of the present legislation and the possible harm. The third chapter is aimed at all kinds of problems in the second chapter to put forward specific countermeasures and suggestions. It includes the following aspects: by drawing lessons from the experience of western developed countries, it is pointed out that the human rights concepts and personal qualities of judicial and law enforcement personnel should be strengthened, and attention should be paid to the perfection of the relevant legal system. Such as the presumption of innocence system and the mechanism of the exclusion of illegal evidence, such as establishing a perfect relief system, such as damage compensation system, to increase the intensity of illegal forced confessions investigation and punishment, and so on. Chapter four puts forward some suggestions on the application of prohibition of extorting confessions by torture in judicial practice. The writing of this thesis is completed on the basis of reading Chinese and foreign literature, and the methods of comparative analysis and historical research are used in the process of writing the thesis. This paper focuses on how to avoid the concrete ways and means of extorting confessions by torture, and hopes that through the writing of this paper, we can do our best to eliminate "extorting confessions by torture" as soon as possible.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：大連海事大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳衛(wèi)東;李偉;王靜;;對(duì)酷刑“酷”起來——“反酷刑公約及附加議定書”國際研討會(huì)述要[J];人民檢察;2006年19期

2 陳瑞華;庭外供述筆錄的非自愿性推定原則——解決刑訊逼供問題的一種立法思路[J];法學(xué)論壇;2005年05期

3 錢洋;;淺談刑事訴訟中刑訊逼供之證明責(zé)任[J];鐵道警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1879289