發(fā)布時間：2018-05-18 13:42

  本文選題：量刑規(guī)范化 + 英美量刑制度��； 參考：《華南理工大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：量刑的規(guī)范化研究與減少量刑偏和量刑失衡是世界各國追求刑法公正的共同方向。刑罰的本質(zhì)特征是對被告人的財產(chǎn)、資格、自由乃至生命的限制或剝奪，是最為嚴厲的一種法律懲罰措施，因此刑罰權的行使被喻為生殺予奪之大事。 為了解決這一難題，尋求公正量刑的道路，，我國法學理論界與司法實踐一直在進行不懈地探索，2010年我國最高人民法院推行了《最高人民法院量刑指導意見（試行）》，旨在“進一步規(guī)范刑罰裁量權，貫徹落實寬嚴相濟的刑事政策，增強量刑的公開性，實現(xiàn)量刑均衡，維護司法公正�！毙谭ㄒ�(guī)范化改革取得了令人矚目的成績，當然也存在許多問題。如價值層面的缺陷，主要有重刑主義觀念存在、刑法特殊預防功能減弱；也有實體層面的缺陷，如量刑基準確定方式不一、量刑情節(jié)不周全、量刑情節(jié)與調(diào)節(jié)比例不適當、刑種轉(zhuǎn)換缺乏明確的依據(jù)等，在程序方面也有缺陷，如法官自由裁量權邊界模糊、法院與檢察院的量刑協(xié)調(diào)關系不適當?shù)取?br/>[Abstract]:The research on standardization of sentencing and the reduction of bias and imbalance of sentencing are the common directions for countries in the world to pursue the justice of criminal law. The essential characteristic of penalty is the restriction or deprivation of the defendant's property, qualification, freedom and even life, which is the most severe measure of legal punishment. Therefore, the exercise of penalty right is regarded as a matter of life and death. In order to solve this problem and seek a fair sentencing path, In 2010, the Supreme people's Court of our country carried out the "sentencing guidance opinion of the Supreme people's Court (trial)" in order to "further standardize the discretion of punishment." To implement the criminal policy of combining leniency with severity, to enhance the openness of sentencing, to achieve a balance in sentencing, and to safeguard judicial justice. " Standardization of criminal law reform has made remarkable achievements, of course, there are many problems. Such as the defects in value level, such as the existence of the concept of heavy punishment, the weakening of the special preventive function of criminal law, and the defects of the substantive level, such as different ways of determining sentencing criteria, inadequate circumstances of sentencing, inappropriate proportion of circumstances and adjustment of sentencing, There are also some defects in the procedure, such as the blur of the boundary of the judge's discretion, the inappropriate relationship between the court and the procuratorate in sentencing and so on.
【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.13;D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 劉霞;;淺談量刑建議與量刑程序訴訟化[J];安康學院學報;2010年03期

2 勞倫斯.M.弗里德曼;傅郁林;;法治、現(xiàn)代化和司法[J];北大法律評論;1998年01期

3 李潔;定罪量刑情節(jié)若干問題研究[J];北華大學學報(社會科學版);2001年01期

4 周光權;量刑規(guī)范化:可行性與難題[J];法律適用;2004年04期

5 宋建華;;論法官量刑時應重視酌定量刑情節(jié)[J];法律適用;2008年08期

6 高銘暄;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策與酌定量刑情節(jié)的適用[J];法學雜志;2007年01期

7 趙廷光;;論量刑原則與量刑公正——關于修改完善我國量刑原則的立法建議[J];法學家;2007年04期

8 林維;;論量刑情節(jié)的適用和基準刑的確定[J];法學家;2010年02期

9 胡學相;論我國刑法中量刑原則的重構[J];法學評論;2005年01期

10 劉華;;寬嚴相濟刑事政策的科學定位與司法適用[J];法學;2007年02期

本文編號：1906046