發(fā)布時間：2018-03-24 17:29

  本文選題：醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟　切入點：專家輔助人制度　出處：《廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中，法官判決案件之關(guān)鍵在于查明醫(yī)方具體的醫(yī)療行為是否存在過錯、該過錯與患方當事人所遭受的損害之間是否有因果關(guān)系。這對于缺乏醫(yī)學(xué)專業(yè)知識的法官而言無疑是個巨大的難題，在患方當事人無法就醫(yī)療損害鑒定意見作出有效的質(zhì)證的情況下，法官有過度依賴鑒定意見的傾向。然而，醫(yī)療鑒定意見因為醫(yī)療損害鑒定制度的原因，其公平性難以保證，法官如果對其過于依賴會嚴重影響司法的公正與權(quán)威。因此，醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中亟需引入專家輔助人制度，促進醫(yī)療損害鑒定制度的改革、維護患方當事人的訴訟權(quán)利、協(xié)助法官公正決斷。由于專家輔助人制度在民事訴訟中已經(jīng)存在多年，無論在立法上還是實踐中都能夠為醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟專家輔助人制度的構(gòu)建提供重要參考。有鑒于此，筆者以我國現(xiàn)行的專家輔助人制度為基礎(chǔ)，結(jié)合醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟的特點，探討在醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟這一特殊情境之下的專家輔助人制度的構(gòu)建。 本文在結(jié)構(gòu)上分為四章，重點論述了構(gòu)建醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中專家輔助人制度的必要性以及具體措施。 第一章主要是闡述醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟專家輔助人制度的基礎(chǔ)理論，包括專家輔助人的概念、作用及訴訟地位。 第二章主要是對構(gòu)建醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟專家輔助人制度的必要性與可行性分析。本章先分析了專家輔助人制度在醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中的重要作用，然后介紹了構(gòu)建醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟專家輔助人制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和實踐基礎(chǔ)。 第三章主要是對域外相關(guān)制度進行考察與分析，以便借鑒域外研究成果。通過分別對美國專家證人制度、意大利技術(shù)顧問制度以及日本訴訟佐人制度中專家的資格與選任、訴訟地位和意見效力等的研究，對相關(guān)制度進行比較與評析。 第四章主要是針對我國醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟的特點，，對構(gòu)建我國醫(yī)療糾紛專家輔助人制度提出立法建議。首先提出醫(yī)療糾紛專家輔助人制度的保障機制；其次，從專家輔助人的資格、參與訴訟的程序、法律責(zé)任以及專家輔助人意見的采信規(guī)則幾個方面提出了構(gòu)建醫(yī)療糾紛專家輔助人制度的基本設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:In the medical dispute litigation, the key of the judge to judge the case is to find out whether the medical action of the doctor is at fault, Whether there is a causal link between the fault and the damage suffered by the affected party is a huge problem for judges who lack medical expertise. When the party concerned is unable to make an effective cross-examination on the opinion of medical damage appraisal, the judge tends to rely excessively on the opinion. However, because of the reasons of the medical damage appraisal system, the fairness of the opinion is difficult to guarantee. If the judge is too dependent on it, it will seriously affect the justice and authority of the judicature. Therefore, it is urgent to introduce the expert assistant system in the medical dispute litigation, to promote the reform of the medical injury appraisal system, and to safeguard the litigant rights of the patients. Assist the judge to make a fair decision. Since the expert assistant system has existed in civil litigation for many years, it can provide an important reference for the construction of the expert assistant system in medical dispute litigation both in legislation and in practice. Based on the current expert assistant system in our country and the characteristics of medical dispute litigation, the author discusses the construction of expert assistant person system under the special situation of medical dispute litigation. This paper is divided into four chapters. It mainly discusses the necessity and concrete measures of constructing the expert assistant system in medical dispute litigation. The first chapter mainly expounds the basic theory of the medical dispute litigation expert assistant system, including the concept, function and litigation status of the expert assistant. The second chapter mainly analyzes the necessity and feasibility of constructing the medical dispute litigation expert assistant system. This chapter first analyzes the important role of the expert assistant person system in the medical dispute litigation. Then it introduces the theoretical and practical basis of constructing the medical dispute litigation expert assistant system. The third chapter is mainly about the investigation and analysis of the extraterritorial related systems, in order to draw lessons from the overseas research results. Through the expert witness system in the United States, the technical adviser system in Italy and the qualification and selection of experts in the Japanese litigation system, The research of litigation status and opinion effect, and so on, carries on the comparison and the appraisal to the related system. The fourth chapter mainly aims at the characteristic of medical dispute litigation in our country, and puts forward the legislative suggestion to construct the medical dispute expert assistant person system in our country. First, it puts forward the safeguard mechanism of medical dispute expert assistant person system; secondly, it puts forward the safeguard mechanism of the medical dispute expert assistant person system. This paper puts forward the basic idea of constructing the system of expert assistant in medical disputes from the aspects of the qualification of expert assistant, the procedure of participating in litigation, the legal responsibility and the rule of acceptance of expert assistant's opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.16;D925.1;D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐繼軍,謝文哲;英美法系專家證人制度弊端評析[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

2 蔣奎;詹啟奎;;對醫(yī)療過錯司法鑒定中幾個關(guān)鍵問題的思考[J];中國司法;2009年02期

3 鄭昱;;論英美法系專家證人制度對我國的借鑒[J];海峽法學(xué);2011年02期

4 邢學(xué)毅;;論在醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中推行專家輔助人制度[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2009年03期

5 盧建軍;;司法鑒定結(jié)論使用中存在問題及解決途徑——兼論我國訴訟專家輔助人制度的建構(gòu)和完善[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2010年06期

6 陳志華;;醫(yī)學(xué)會從事醫(yī)療損害鑒定之合法性研究[J];證據(jù)科學(xué);2011年03期

7 范加慶;朱麗云;;淺談我國專家輔助人制度[J];法制與社會;2011年17期

8 左寧;;我國刑事專家輔助人制度基本問題論略[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年12期

9 孫則政;;“有專門知識的人”之職能分析與制度完善[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2013年06期

10 劉景亮;;“有專門知識的人”意見效力初析[J];法制博覽(中旬刊);2014年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張英;一元處理機制下醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

本文編號：1659305