個(gè)人環(huán)境致害行為法律規(guī)制研究
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the main body of environmental pollution has changed from company and enterprise to individual. There is no complete legal system to regulate the behavior of personal environmental harm at home and abroad. It is generally based on the objective reality to formulate separate laws or to use the mechanism of litigation to deal with specific personal environmental harm behavior. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the concept of personal environmental harm behavior, and to analyze the necessity and feasibility of regulating individual environmental harm behavior by combining the relevant laws and regulations of our country's environmental protection law, tort liability law and practice, and at the same time using Germany for reference. On the basis of the experience of the regulation of personal environmental harm in the United States, this paper provides some suggestions for the construction of the legal norms of personal environmental harm in our country. The text is composed of four chapters: the first chapter analyzes the concept and classification of personal environmental harm behavior, and analyzes the legal and economic basis of the regulation of personal environmental harm behavior. The necessity of regulation and the essential factors of regulation are obtained. The second chapter analyzes the legislation of personal environmental harm from two aspects: legislation analysis and current situation inspection. Through the analysis of the theory of personal environmental harm behavior in our country and the deficiency analysis of the existing laws and regulations, on the basis of paying close attention to the current situation of the problem in our country, we can draw a conclusion that the theory of this problem is legitimate. Is in line with the trend of development of the times. The third chapter carries on the outside investigation to the personal environmental harm behavior, unifies the Germany, the United States about this question the legislation regulation, summarizes the experience, serves as our country to this question regulation reference. The fourth chapter analyzes the conception of the legal regulation of personal environmental harm behavior in China from the following three aspects: the establishment of the legislative provisions of personal environmental harm, the revision of the relevant legal protection system and the ideological concept, and the introduction of extraterritorial experience to improve the present situation. It has reference value to put forward the suggestion of regulating personal environmental harm behavior from three aspects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D922.68
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 吳衛(wèi)星;;我國(guó)環(huán)境權(quán)理論研究三十年之回顧、反思與前瞻[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2014年05期
2 王曦;謝海波;;論環(huán)境權(quán)法定化在美國(guó)的冷遇及其原因[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年04期
3 陳海嵩;;國(guó)家環(huán)境保護(hù)義務(wù)的溯源與展開(kāi)[J];法學(xué)研究;2014年03期
4 陶倫康;;公民個(gè)人環(huán)境行為監(jiān)管法律制度創(chuàng)新研究——以低碳經(jīng)濟(jì)為視角[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2011年03期
5 劉超;;權(quán)利沖突視野中的環(huán)境侵權(quán)救濟(jì)路徑選擇——一個(gè)類型化的分析視角[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期
6 呂忠梅;;環(huán)境侵權(quán)的遺傳與變異——論環(huán)境侵害的制度演進(jìn)[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期
7 陳貽健;;生態(tài)馬克思主義的異化消費(fèi)觀與環(huán)境法的反思[J];行政與法;2009年12期
8 胡元聰;;論消費(fèi)領(lǐng)域外部性的經(jīng)濟(jì)法解決——基于公民環(huán)境權(quán)法制保障[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2009年09期
9 王艷;;試析我國(guó)病態(tài)消費(fèi)行為的形式、實(shí)質(zhì)和危害——兼論科學(xué)消費(fèi)模式的構(gòu)建[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年08期
10 喬瑜;;美國(guó)社會(huì)的個(gè)人主義與環(huán)境保護(hù)觀念的關(guān)系[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年01期
,本文編號(hào):2131387
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2131387.html