發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-04 10:07

【摘要】：當(dāng)前我國(guó)醫(yī)療糾紛的處理及解決正處于一個(gè)瓶頸期。一方面醫(yī)患關(guān)系不斷惡化，矛盾沖突升級(jí)，醫(yī)療糾紛呈現(xiàn)愈演愈烈之勢(shì)；另一方面醫(yī)療糾紛的處理機(jī)制存在先天不足的固有缺陷，沒(méi)有發(fā)揮出應(yīng)有疏導(dǎo)化解、定紛止?fàn)幍淖饔谩?非訴訟糾紛解決機(jī)制是近些年來(lái)學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)務(wù)界一直倡導(dǎo)和推崇的處理醫(yī)療糾紛的秘藥良方。但是我國(guó)法律規(guī)定的處理醫(yī)療糾紛的非訴訟方式僅有兩種：協(xié)商和行政調(diào)解。并且此兩種方法正面臨著自身困境：協(xié)商的欠規(guī)范化和行政調(diào)解的邊緣化。本文通過(guò)分析我國(guó)醫(yī)療糾紛非訴訟解決機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀和存在的問(wèn)題，，指出其推行的瓶頸并提出相應(yīng)的完善建議，另外結(jié)合當(dāng)前全國(guó)各地正紛紛進(jìn)行的解決醫(yī)療糾紛的有益探索：如建立獨(dú)立的第三方調(diào)解機(jī)制、設(shè)立獨(dú)立于行政機(jī)關(guān)的仲裁機(jī)構(gòu)，引入醫(yī)療責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)，醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定體系的完善等等，提出我國(guó)應(yīng)實(shí)行“協(xié)商規(guī)范化、調(diào)解體系化、仲裁鼓勵(lì)化、醫(yī)療責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)強(qiáng)制化、醫(yī)療鑒定體系統(tǒng)一化”這五位一體的宏觀思路，來(lái)構(gòu)建符合中國(guó)國(guó)情和當(dāng)前實(shí)際、切實(shí)可行的醫(yī)療糾紛非訴訟解決機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:At present, the treatment and resolution of medical disputes in our country is in a bottleneck period. On the one hand, the doctor-patient relationship continues to deteriorate, conflicts escalate, medical disputes become more and more intense; on the other hand, the medical dispute handling mechanism has inherent defects, has not played the role of due guidance to resolve, resolve disputes. Non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism has been advocated and respected by academic and practical circles in recent years. However, there are only two kinds of non-litigation ways to deal with medical disputes: consultation and administrative mediation. And these two methods are facing their own predicament: the understandardization of negotiation and the marginalization of administrative mediation. Based on the analysis of the current situation and existing problems of non-litigation mechanism for resolving medical disputes in China, this paper points out the bottleneck of its implementation and puts forward corresponding suggestions to improve it. In addition, combining with the beneficial explorations being carried out in various parts of the country to resolve medical disputes, such as the establishment of an independent third-party mediation mechanism, the establishment of arbitration institutions independent of administrative organs, and the introduction of medical liability insurance, The perfection of the medical appraisal system and so on. It is put forward that China should carry out "consultation standardization, mediation systemization, arbitration encouragement, medical liability insurance compulsion, medical appraisal system unified" as the macro thinking of "consultation standardization, mediation systemization, arbitration encouragement, medical liability insurance compulsion, medical appraisal system unified". To build a practical and practical medical dispute settlement mechanism in accordance with China's national conditions and current reality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南昌大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：R-051;D922.16

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 吳玉煒;;淺談醫(yī)療糾紛解決機(jī)制的現(xiàn)狀及完善[J];延安職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期

2 馮亦濃;劉翊峰;張瑞琛;顧子皓;方樂(lè);;醫(yī)療糾紛處理雙軌制徹底破除的思考[J];法制博覽;2015年31期

3 劉坤孟;項(xiàng)楠;沈宇超;李瑞峰;;淺論我國(guó)醫(yī)療糾紛ADR機(jī)制[J];價(jià)值工程;2015年20期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 武芯宇;醫(yī)療糾紛的非訴訟處理機(jī)制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2016年

本文編號(hào)：2163546