發(fā)布時間：2018-05-23 14:37

  本文選題：耽美文學 + 美學語法��； 參考：《中共福建省委黨校學報》2017年09期

【摘要】：耽美文學已經(jīng)成為我國網(wǎng)絡文學的重要類型。毛尖教授指控其為資產(chǎn)階級二代的美學語法,這種指責把美學趣味和階級身份處理成簡單機械的二元對應,單向的精英化的批判思維把復雜多元的網(wǎng)絡文藝簡單化了,既缺乏社會學的實證,也缺乏美學的細膩;既無視了網(wǎng)絡文藝本身的復雜性,也無視了耽美小說讀者的分化性。為批判而批判使她沒能發(fā)現(xiàn)耽美寫作真正的問題——太過平滑。網(wǎng)絡耽美小說如果能夠在寫作中制造歧義,更加積極地回應現(xiàn)實,換一種方式參與歷史,就完全有可能呈現(xiàn)出與毛尖教授的判斷截然不同的面貌。
[Abstract]:Danmei literature has become an important type of network literature in China. Professor Mao Jian accused him of being the second generation of bourgeois aesthetic grammar. This accusation treated aesthetic taste and class identity as a simple and mechanical dualistic correspondence, and one-way elite critical thinking simplified the complex and pluralistic network literature and art. It lacks both sociological evidence and aesthetic delicacy; it ignores the complexity of network literature and art itself, and ignores the differentiation of readers of Tanmei novels. Criticizing for critique made her fail to discover the real problem of Daime's writing-it was too smooth. If the novel can create ambiguity in writing, respond to reality more actively and participate in history in another way, it is quite possible to present a totally different face from Professor Mao Jian's judgment.
【作者單位】： 福建社會科學院;
【分類號】：I207.42
，

本文編號：1925198