發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-04 18:47

  本文選題：馬克思　切入點(diǎn)：蒲魯東　出處：《長(zhǎng)安大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：資本主義社會(huì)的生產(chǎn)資料私有制,使工業(yè)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)和工業(yè)資產(chǎn)階級(jí)的矛盾日益凸顯。一些有識(shí)之士開(kāi)始在資本主義社會(huì)這個(gè)大基礎(chǔ)背景下探索解放工人的索要。于是出現(xiàn)了各種各樣的理論思潮。蒲魯東思想就是其中之一,蒲魯東代表小資產(chǎn)階級(jí)反對(duì)資本主義社會(huì)的大資產(chǎn)階級(jí),力圖為工業(yè)無(wú)產(chǎn)階級(jí)找到實(shí)現(xiàn)他們權(quán)利平等的理論工具。然而蒲魯東的理論卻唯心了,缺乏資本主義社會(huì)生產(chǎn)的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ),使他的理論不能成為科學(xué)。而馬克思立足于資本主義現(xiàn)實(shí)的生產(chǎn)關(guān)系,堅(jiān)持辯證唯物主義創(chuàng)立了唯物史觀�！墩軐W(xué)的貧困》這部著作就是馬克思主義唯物史觀的第一次公開(kāi)闡發(fā),是馬克思揭露蒲魯東的唯心史觀和蒲魯東不現(xiàn)實(shí)的小資產(chǎn)階級(jí)政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的偉大勝利,為科學(xué)社會(huì)主義的誕生奠定了基礎(chǔ),是馬克思主義創(chuàng)立的標(biāo)志至少是重要標(biāo)志。本文從馬克思與蒲魯東交往關(guān)系的演變?nèi)胧?以資本主義的“生產(chǎn)”為主線,十分重視馬克思重要著作的內(nèi)在聯(lián)系。在縱向上闡述了馬克思(包括恩格斯)從《1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》到《哲學(xué)的貧困》的心路歷程,并聯(lián)系到后來(lái)的《資本論》�！�1844年經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)哲學(xué)手稿》由于受黑格爾和西方經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)者的影響,雖然對(duì)西方政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)展開(kāi)了研究,但是對(duì)政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的研究對(duì)象并未科學(xué)確立�！墩軐W(xué)的貧困》以唯物史觀為指導(dǎo),科學(xué)確立了政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的研究對(duì)象問(wèn)題;橫向上研究了從《德意志意識(shí)形態(tài)》到《哲學(xué)的貧困》中唯物史觀“生產(chǎn)關(guān)系”范疇的確立過(guò)程,并聯(lián)系到后來(lái)的《共產(chǎn)黨宣言》�！兜乱庵疽庾R(shí)形態(tài)》沒(méi)有嚴(yán)格區(qū)分“交往關(guān)系”與“生產(chǎn)關(guān)系”,認(rèn)為“交往關(guān)系”與生產(chǎn)力是一對(duì)基本范疇,而《哲學(xué)的貧困》科學(xué)的確立了“生產(chǎn)關(guān)系”這一經(jīng)濟(jì)范疇,并說(shuō)明了生產(chǎn)力與生產(chǎn)關(guān)系的辯證運(yùn)動(dòng),是唯物史觀的成熟應(yīng)用,從而說(shuō)明了新世界觀公開(kāi)問(wèn)世的革命性與科學(xué)性。《哲學(xué)的貧困》是馬克思主義哲學(xué)與政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的成功結(jié)合,并因這個(gè)科學(xué)的結(jié)合得出了科學(xué)的理論,論證了科學(xué)社會(huì)主義的必然性與革命性。論文立足于資本主義社會(huì)的“生產(chǎn)”方面,以全面的眼光來(lái)分析《哲學(xué)的貧困》在馬克思主義思想史發(fā)展中的地位和《哲學(xué)的貧困》與馬克思主義理論體系創(chuàng)立的關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:The private ownership of the means of production in capitalist society makes the contradiction between the industrial proletariat and the industrial bourgeoisie increasingly prominent.Some men of insight began to explore the demands of liberating workers against the backdrop of capitalist society.A variety of theoretical trends emerged.Poluton thought is one of them, on behalf of the petty bourgeoisie against the capitalist society of the big bourgeoisie, trying to find for the industrial proletariat to achieve their equal rights theoretical tools.However, Prudon's theory is idealistic and lacks the realistic foundation of capitalist society's production, so his theory can not become science.Marx, based on the capitalist reality of the relations of production and adhering to dialectical materialism, founded the historical materialism. This work, "philosophical Poverty", is the first public interpretation of Marxist historical materialism.It is Marx's revelation of Buluton's idealistic view of history and the great victory of his unrealistic petty bourgeois political economy, which laid the foundation for the birth of scientific socialism, and is at least an important symbol of the creation of Marxism.This paper begins with the evolution of the relationship between Marx and Buluton, takes the "production" of capitalism as the main line, and attaches great importance to the internal connection of Marx's important works.This paper expounds the course of Marx (including Engels) from "the manuscript of Economics and philosophy in 1844" to "the Poverty of philosophy" longitudinally.And related to the later Capital. The manuscript of Economics and philosophy in 1844 was influenced by Hegel and Western economists, although the study of western political economy was carried out.However, the research object of political economy has not been scientifically established. "the poverty of philosophy" is guided by historical materialism, and the research object of political economy is scientifically established.Horizontally, it studies the establishment process of the category of "relations of production" in historical materialism from "German ideology" to "poverty in philosophy".In connection with the later Manifesto of the Communist Party, the German ideology does not strictly distinguish between "relations of association" and "relations of production", and considers that "relations of association" and productive forces are a pair of basic categories.The poverty of philosophy establishes the economic category of "relations of production" scientifically, and explains the dialectical movement of productive forces and relations of production, which is the mature application of historical materialism.This explains the revolutionary and scientific nature of the public appearance of the new world outlook. Poverty in philosophy is a successful combination of Marxist philosophy and political economics, and a scientific theory has been derived from the combination of this science.The necessity and revolution of scientific socialism are demonstrated.Based on the "production" aspect of capitalist society, this paper analyzes the position of "philosophical poverty" in the history of Marxist ideology and the relationship between "philosophical poverty" and the establishment of Marxist theoretical system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)安大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：A811

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張盾;褚當(dāng)陽(yáng);;從當(dāng)代財(cái)富問(wèn)題看馬克思對(duì)蒲魯東的批判[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

2 陳勝云;《哲學(xué)的貧困》中的社會(huì)批判方法[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);1997年10期

3 陳延斌;論《哲學(xué)的貧困》在馬克思主義發(fā)展史上的地位[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年01期

4 張一兵;歷史唯物主義與政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的最初接合──普魯東與馬克思的《哲學(xué)的貧困》[J];中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王步峰;我國(guó)集體土地所有權(quán)的法律分析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年

2 何法宣;論馬克思對(duì)蒲魯東的批判及現(xiàn)代意義[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1711237