發(fā)布時間：2018-07-02 23:13

  本文選題：葛蘭西 + 文化領導權��； 參考：《四川師范大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：葛蘭西的文化領導權思想在基于絕對的歷史主義和實踐一元論的視野中,囊括了“有機知識分子”的歷史使命、“被壓迫的社會群體”現(xiàn)實遭遇以及市民社會的葛氏轉向等多個議題,為無產(chǎn)階級革命領導權的獲取與鞏固提供了深層次的倫理道德的理論支撐與情感維系。應該注意到的是,葛蘭西文化領導權在今天的研究重點,已經(jīng)由從概念上的有機構成抑或其最終留下的結論到總體性的一個展開。因此,理論回到葛蘭西并對葛蘭西文化領導權思想完整把握,應該以總體性的理論視角與全面性的理論結構來重新審視它。論文首先在這個意義上,一方面,試圖從總體性出發(fā),以期在橫向視角上從各個學科領域來把握文化領導權理論,同時在縱向視角上認為文化領導權既是先前一切文化淵藪的結果,也將會在自由王國中積極揚棄;另一方面,試圖從全面性的理論視角來把握文化領導權理論來源、理論結構、理論特征以及關于踐行難點的反思。其次,可以看到文化領導權思想經(jīng)由葛蘭西典范性的首創(chuàng)后,繼而由阿爾都塞、普蘭查斯、拉克勞、墨菲、哈貝馬斯從階級斗爭、話語、商談理論、日常生活、科學技術等等多個要素對其進行理論的豐富與完善,批判與揚棄,從而構成了葛蘭西文化領導權在西方馬克思主義傳統(tǒng)中批判與演進的理論路向�？梢哉f,西方馬克思主義各個不同的學派對文化領導權思想的進一步說明與補充,使得文化領導權本身得到了極大的發(fā)展。最后,在對葛蘭西文化領導權的理論圖像與理論路向的完整說明以后,回顧中國的文化領導權建構的歷程,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我們國家的文化建設方面與葛蘭西所提出的文化領導權的問題都堅信文化等意識形態(tài)建設越來越成為無產(chǎn)階級政黨的重要任務。眾所周知,中國共產(chǎn)黨人對文化建設的不斷努力,使得文化等意識形態(tài)領導權不斷地在歷史的動態(tài)中得到平衡和鞏固并在人民大眾中凝聚成強烈的認同,從而為中國特色社會主義現(xiàn)代化的大踏步前進鳴鑼開道。因此,論文的關鍵在于,以葛蘭西的文化領導權思想為經(jīng),以文化領導權思想的理論路向為緯,以中國文化領導權建構為切入點,反思中國領導權建構的現(xiàn)實遭遇,并切中時弊地給出建設性的意見。
[Abstract]:In the view of absolute historicism and practical monism, Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership includes the historical mission of "organic intellectuals". The realistic encounter of the "oppressed social group" and the civil society's turn of Gehlet provide the theoretical support and emotional support for the acquisition and consolidation of the proletarian revolutionary leadership. It should be noted that the research focus of Gramsci's cultural leadership today has been expanded from the concept of organic composition or its final conclusion to the overall nature. Therefore, the return of the theory to Gramsci and the complete grasp of Gramsci's cultural leadership should be reexamined from the perspective of the overall theory and the comprehensive theoretical structure. First of all, in this sense, on the one hand, the thesis tries to start from the totality, in order to grasp the theory of cultural leadership from the perspective of various disciplines. At the same time, it is considered that cultural leadership is not only the result of all previous cultures, but also will be actively abandoned in the free kingdom. On the other hand, it tries to grasp the theoretical source and structure of cultural leadership from a comprehensive theoretical perspective. Theoretical characteristics and reflection on the difficulties of practice. Secondly, we can see that cultural leadership thought was first created by Gramsci, and then by Althusser, Prancas, Laclau, Murphy, Habermas from class struggle, discourse, negotiation theory, daily life. Many elements such as science and technology enrich and perfect the theory, criticize and sublate it, thus constitute the theoretical direction of the criticism and evolution of Gramsci's cultural leadership in the western Marxist tradition. It can be said that the different schools of Western Marxism further explain and supplement the thought of cultural leadership, which makes the cultural leadership itself greatly developed. Finally, after a complete explanation of the theoretical images and theoretical directions of Gramsci's cultural leadership, the author reviews the course of the construction of cultural leadership in China. It can be found that both the cultural construction of our country and the cultural leadership raised by Gramsci firmly believe that the construction of ideology such as culture is becoming an important task of the proletarian party. As we all know, the constant efforts of the Chinese Communists in cultural construction have made the leadership of ideology such as culture constantly balanced and consolidated in the dynamics of history and condensed into a strong identity among the masses of the people. Thus opening the way for the great strides forward of socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics. Therefore, the key of the thesis is to reflect on the realistic experience of the construction of Chinese cultural leadership by taking Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership as the classics, the theoretical direction of the thought of cultural leadership as the weft, and the construction of Chinese cultural leadership as the breakthrough point. At the same time, give constructive advice.
【學位授予單位】：四川師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G02

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 胡愛玲;;葛蘭西對“意識形態(tài)”實踐功能的闡釋[J];鄭州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年06期

2 孫晶;葛蘭西的文化領導權思想[J];馬克思主義研究;2002年03期

3 李知恕,黃金輝;葛蘭西實踐哲學述評[J];西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2002年05期

4 李佃來;葛蘭西與當代市民社會理論傳統(tǒng)[J];學術月刊;2004年01期

5 李佃來;哈貝馬斯市民社會理論探討[J];哲學研究;2004年06期

6 焦勇勤;葛蘭西文藝思想評析[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學院學報);2002年06期

7 孟繁華;大眾文化與文化領導權[J];文藝爭鳴;2005年03期

8 田時綱;;“egemonia”是“領導權”還是“霸權”——葛蘭西政治理論的核心范疇[J];教學與研究;2007年08期

9 周凡;重讀葛蘭西的霸權理論[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實;2005年05期

10 李海青;;理想的公共生活如何可能——對“公共理性”的一種政治倫理學闡釋[J];倫理學研究;2008年03期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 習近平;;在同全國勞動模范代表座談時的講話[N];人民日報;2013年

，

本文編號：2091279