發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-03 08:03

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：英語(yǔ)名詞化在中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生畢業(yè)論文中的體現(xiàn)　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 名詞化 語(yǔ)料庫(kù) 英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作 中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生 專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者

【摘要】：自1924年Jespersen對(duì)名詞化進(jìn)行的第一次嘗試性研究起,不同的語(yǔ)言學(xué)流派對(duì)名詞化這一英語(yǔ)書(shū)面語(yǔ)的典型特征已作了數(shù)十年的研究。在所有名詞化理論中,系統(tǒng)功能視角的研究更深刻、更系統(tǒng),因?yàn)橄到y(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法對(duì)名詞化的研究并不是局限于句法分析,而是通過(guò)名詞化與語(yǔ)法隱喻的聯(lián)系,將研究擴(kuò)展到名詞化在書(shū)面英語(yǔ)中的語(yǔ)篇功能。自系統(tǒng)功能語(yǔ)法對(duì)名詞化的研究之后,一些定性研究和定量研究便以此為理論框架,對(duì)英語(yǔ)文本進(jìn)行研究。定性研究主要詳細(xì)說(shuō)明了名詞化在語(yǔ)篇中的作用,研究表明,名詞化的作用主要包括提高語(yǔ)篇的銜接性,客觀性,簡(jiǎn)潔性,邏輯性,信息量,可信度,權(quán)威性,不可協(xié)商性等,這些功能恰恰證明了本研究的重要性,也為本研究的定性分析部分提供了理論支撐。 以往對(duì)名詞化的實(shí)證研究主要集中在名詞化的語(yǔ)類(lèi)特征和中國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)者英語(yǔ)名詞化習(xí)得兩個(gè)方面。關(guān)于第一個(gè)方面的研究結(jié)論相對(duì)統(tǒng)一,即名詞化的出現(xiàn)頻率與文本的正式程度成正比。關(guān)于第二個(gè)方面的研究則不僅數(shù)量很有限,而且研究結(jié)論存在爭(zhēng)議。一些基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的研究(如,席2006 吳2009)證明,中國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)者和本族語(yǔ)者在使用名詞化方面存在顯著差異,而另一些研究(如,王陳2008)指出此差異并不顯著。另外,以往對(duì)名詞化的實(shí)證研究大多以中國(guó)本科生(包括英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)與非英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè))為研究對(duì)象,語(yǔ)料主要由考試作文構(gòu)成,這說(shuō)明他們的研究對(duì)象為英語(yǔ)學(xué)習(xí)者而非英語(yǔ)使用者,因此,本作者選擇英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)的碩士生作為研究對(duì)象,選用他們的碩士畢業(yè)論文作為語(yǔ)料,因?yàn)樗麄冏鳛榇T士畢業(yè)論文的撰寫(xiě)者,僅把英語(yǔ)作為一個(gè)語(yǔ)言工具,應(yīng)被視作高層次的英語(yǔ)使用者。還有,以往的定量研究大部分都是基于專(zhuān)門(mén)選取的文本或者小型語(yǔ)料庫(kù),所以很有必要用大型的語(yǔ)料庫(kù)作進(jìn)一步研究,而本研究的語(yǔ)料大于以往任何一個(gè)基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的名詞化研究所使用的語(yǔ)料。 本研究所用的兩個(gè)語(yǔ)料由作者通過(guò)網(wǎng)上電子資源自建。語(yǔ)料CPEU由120篇選自英文核心期刊的學(xué)術(shù)期刊文章構(gòu)成,語(yǔ)料CPGT由120篇中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生的畢業(yè)論文構(gòu)成。研究旨在回答以下兩個(gè)問(wèn)題：1.中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生作為高層次的英語(yǔ)使用者,他們?cè)诋厴I(yè)論文中使用英語(yǔ)名詞化的水平是否已經(jīng)達(dá)到專(zhuān)業(yè)水準(zhǔn)?2.理工類(lèi)、外語(yǔ)類(lèi)和綜合類(lèi)院校的英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生在畢業(yè)論文中使用名詞化方面是否存在差異?通過(guò)檢索軟件Wordsmith和描述分析軟件SPSS,本作者在專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者和中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生之間,以及中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生內(nèi)部作了對(duì)比研究,并得出了以下結(jié)論： 在宏觀層面,中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生在使用名詞化方面與專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者存在顯著差異,并且中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生使用名詞化的總數(shù)量大于專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者；而微觀層面研究表明,中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生對(duì)名詞化的這種過(guò)度使用源于對(duì)以-tion,-ness和-ance結(jié)尾的名詞化的過(guò)度使用,其過(guò)度使用原因有兩個(gè),一是中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生積極詞匯相對(duì)專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者較小,導(dǎo)致他們對(duì)某些詞反復(fù)使用；二是某些畢業(yè)論文的話題導(dǎo)致文中多次重復(fù)出現(xiàn)某些詞。但第一個(gè)原因是主要原因。另外,微觀層面的研究還表明,中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生對(duì)以-acy結(jié)尾的名詞化使用顯著不足,而對(duì)以-sion,-ment,-ence,-ity,-ery和-encv結(jié)尾的名詞化的使用已經(jīng)到達(dá)專(zhuān)業(yè)水平。還有,對(duì)所研究的10種名詞化基于量的排序顯示,兩個(gè)語(yǔ)料并無(wú)顯著差異。 對(duì)于來(lái)自不同類(lèi)型院校的英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生之間的內(nèi)部差異問(wèn)題,本研究的結(jié)論是,在宏觀層面,外語(yǔ)類(lèi)和綜合類(lèi)院校英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生在使用名詞化方面的水平高于理工類(lèi)碩士生,因?yàn)轱@著性檢驗(yàn)表明,在使用名詞化的宏觀層面,外語(yǔ)類(lèi)和綜合類(lèi)類(lèi)院校英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生與專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者并無(wú)顯著性差異,而理工類(lèi)院校的英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生與專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者之間存在顯著差異。微觀層面的研究顯示,理工類(lèi)院校英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生與專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者在三種名詞化的使用上差異顯著,而外語(yǔ)類(lèi)和綜合類(lèi)院校碩士生與專(zhuān)業(yè)的英語(yǔ)使用者只在兩種名詞化的使用上差異顯著。 本文的定性分析部分表明,名詞化在“質(zhì)”和“量”同樣重要,中國(guó)英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)碩士生在名詞化的“質(zhì)”方面基本能做到正確合理使用。
[Abstract]:Since 1924, Jespersen of nominalization's first attempt of research, the typical characteristics of different schools of linguistics of English Nominalization the written language has been studied for several decades. In all nominalization theory, systemic functional perspective is more profound, more system, because of systemic functional grammar the research is not limited to syntactic parsing, but through nominalization with grammatical metaphor, will be extended to the study of textual functions of Nominalizations in written English. Since the study of systemic functional grammar, some qualitative and quantitative research is based on the theoretical framework of research on English text qualitatively. The main research details the role of Nominalization in discourse studies suggest that the role of nominalization mainly includes enhancing the cohesion, discourse, objectivity, simplicity, logic, information, credibility, authority These functions prove the importance of this study and provide theoretical support for the qualitative analysis of this study.
Two aspects of previous empirical studies on the nominalization mainly concentrated in the generic features of Nominalization and Chinese learners of English Nominalization acquisition. Relatively uniform conclusions about the first aspect, namely the formal degree of nominalization frequency and text is proportional. Research on second aspects is not only a very limited number. The conclusion of the study and controversy. Some corpus based study (e.g., 2006 seats Wu 2009) proved that China learners and native speakers have significant differences in the use of nominalization, and other studies (e.g., Wang Chen 2008) pointed out that this difference is not significant. In addition, previous empirical studies on the nominalization mostly Chinese undergraduate (including English Majors and non English majors) as the research object, the test corpus consists mainly of compositions, which shows their object of study for English learners and non English users, therefore, the The choice of English major postgraduates as the research object, use their master's thesis as the corpus, because they act as master of the graduation thesis writing, only to English as a language tool, should be regarded as high level English users. Also, most of the previous quantitative researches are specifically chosen texts or small based on the corpus, so it is necessary to further study with a large corpus, and the data of this study is larger than any previous use of nominalization based on corpus corpus.
Two corpora used in this study by the author through the electronic resources on the Internet. By 120 CPEU self built corpus from English core journals in academic journal articles, corpus CPGT composed of 120 China English Major Postgraduate graduation thesis. The research aims to answer the following two questions: 1. Chinese English major graduate students as high level English speakers, whether they use English Nominalization in the thesis has reached the level of professionalism? 2. science and engineering, foreign language classes and universities master English majors use nouns in graduation thesis of whether differences exist? By retrieval software Wordsmith and description analysis software SPSS, the author in between professional English users and Chinese English major graduate students, as well as the internal China English major graduate students made a comparative study, and draws the following conclusions:
At the macro level, China postgraduates majoring in English Nominalization and professional English users have significant differences, and the total number of Chinese English Major Postgraduate nominalization than professional English users; and the micro level studies show that China English majors master the nominalization from the excessive use of -tion, the excessive use of -ness and -ance at the end of the term, the excessive use of two reasons, one is the Chinese English Major Postgraduate active vocabulary relative professional English users is small, they lead to repeated use of certain words; the two is some graduation thesis topic leads to the repeated emergence of some words. But the first the reason is the main reason. In addition, the micro studies also showed that China English major graduates of nouns ending in -acy use significantly less than for -sion, -men The use of nominalization at the end of T, -ence, -ity, -ery and -encv has reached the professional level. Besides, there are no significant differences between the 10 nominalization based on quantity ranking, and two corpus.
For the problem of internal differences from different types of College English major postgraduate students, the conclusion of this study is, at the macro level, the level of English major postgraduate students in the use of Nominalization in foreign language classes and comprehensive colleges than science and engineering graduate students, because the results showed that at the macro level the use of the term. English speakers no foreign language classes and comprehensive college English major graduate students and professional significant differences, there are significant differences between the science and Engineering College English major graduate students and professional English users. Microscopic study shows that English Majors in Colleges of science and engineering, graduate students and professional English users in three Nominalization is significant, and the use of foreign language classes and class of Postgraduates in Colleges and professional English users in only two of nominalization are significant differences.
The qualitative part of this paper shows that nominalization is equally important in quality and quantity. Chinese English majors can basically make proper use of Nominalization in terms of quality.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：H314

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳春明;;大學(xué)生英語(yǔ)寫(xiě)作中的名詞化研究——基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的考察[J];瘋狂英語(yǔ)(教師版);2009年03期

2 文秋芳;俞希;;英語(yǔ)的國(guó)際化與本土化[J];國(guó)外外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2003年03期

3 劉國(guó)輝;;動(dòng)詞名化的兩性特征:動(dòng)詞性與名詞性共存表征及其理?yè)?jù)[J];國(guó)外外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2007年03期

4 湯斌;;廣告語(yǔ)篇中的名詞化研究[J];國(guó)外外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2007年03期

5 徐玉臣;;名詞化的生成機(jī)制、類(lèi)型及功能的新視界[J];外語(yǔ)教學(xué)理論與實(shí)踐;2009年02期

6 高航;;概念物化與名詞化[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

7 張文忠;楊士超;;中國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)者英語(yǔ)語(yǔ)料庫(kù)中動(dòng)名搭配錯(cuò)誤研究[J];解放軍外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

8 范文芳,汪明杰;論三大流派對(duì)英語(yǔ)名詞化現(xiàn)象的研究[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2003年03期

9 程曉堂;名詞化與語(yǔ)用預(yù)設(shè)[J];外語(yǔ)研究;2003年03期

10 范文芳;名詞化隱喻的語(yǔ)篇銜接功能[J];外語(yǔ)研究;1999年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前5條

1 劉春燕;中國(guó)學(xué)生對(duì)英語(yǔ)名物化的習(xí)得[D];江西師范大學(xué);2002年

2 席緒慧;非英語(yǔ)專(zhuān)業(yè)學(xué)生英語(yǔ)作文中名詞化現(xiàn)象研究及其教學(xué)意義[D];華東師范大學(xué);2006年

3 萬(wàn)華;基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的高頻動(dòng)詞搭配研究[D];上海外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2007年

4 阮洋;基于語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的科技英語(yǔ)中名詞化結(jié)構(gòu)及其概念功能分析[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

5 嵇芳;中英文廣告語(yǔ)篇中名詞化的認(rèn)知研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1373057