發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-17 15:02

【摘要】：自20世紀(jì)初,隨著西方藝術(shù)史學(xué)界對(duì)中國(guó)畫(huà)及畫(huà)史研究的不斷深入,“職業(yè)畫(huà)家”作為研究中國(guó)畫(huà)史的一個(gè)重要畫(huà)家類型,亦得到不斷的認(rèn)識(shí)和評(píng)價(jià),其主要可以分為欣賞、批評(píng)和再認(rèn)識(shí),作為一位美國(guó)藝術(shù)史學(xué)家,高居翰在對(duì)“職業(yè)畫(huà)家”的認(rèn)識(shí)及評(píng)價(jià)問(wèn)題上,也受到了西方藝術(shù)史學(xué)界不同研究時(shí)期的影響,而他關(guān)于這一問(wèn)題的成熟探討則主要形成于20世紀(jì)70年代,筆者認(rèn)為,高居翰主要從兩個(gè)方面來(lái)進(jìn)行論述,一是從藝術(shù)史的“內(nèi)相關(guān)”出發(fā),其主要以鑒定、形式與風(fēng)格分析和材料研究為主的方法論,來(lái)認(rèn)識(shí)技法于藝術(shù)風(fēng)格轉(zhuǎn)變的影響,發(fā)掘中國(guó)繪畫(huà)在“寫(xiě)實(shí)主義"上的輝煌成就,并且認(rèn)為中國(guó)“職業(yè)畫(huà)家"在這一點(diǎn)上功不可沒(méi),試圖消除中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)認(rèn)識(shí)中對(duì)“職業(yè)畫(huà)家”的消極評(píng)價(jià)；二是從“藝術(shù)贊助人”的角度出發(fā),從藝術(shù)與社會(huì)關(guān)系的角度來(lái)研究繪畫(huà)作品,揭示文人畫(huà)家在繪畫(huà)創(chuàng)作中的藝術(shù)贊助因素,來(lái)反證文人畫(huà)家對(duì)“職業(yè)畫(huà)家"的傳統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)存在著一種誤解和偏見(jiàn),需要糾正,以這兩點(diǎn)為基礎(chǔ),高居翰完成了對(duì)中國(guó)繪畫(huà)史中“職業(yè)畫(huà)家”的再認(rèn)識(shí)和再評(píng)價(jià),展現(xiàn)出一種不同于中國(guó)畫(huà)史研究新方法和新觀點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of the 20th century, with the deepening of the study of Chinese painting and painting history in western art history circles, "professional painter", as an important type of painters in studying the history of Chinese painting, has also been continuously recognized and evaluated, which can be mainly divided into appreciation. Criticism and re-understanding, as an American art historian, Gao Jihan's understanding and evaluation of "professional painters" have also been influenced by different periods of Western art historiography. However, his mature discussion on this issue was mainly formed in the 1970s. The author thinks that Gao Juhan mainly discusses from two aspects, one is from the art history of "internal correlation", its main purpose is to identify. The methodology of form and style analysis and material research is used to understand the influence of techniques on the change of artistic style, to discover the brilliant achievements of Chinese painting in "realism", and to think that Chinese "professional painters" have contributed to this. This paper tries to eliminate the negative evaluation of "professional painters" in traditional Chinese cognition, and the second is to study paintings from the angle of "art patron" and from the angle of art and social relations. To reveal the artistic sponsorship factors of literati painters in painting creation, to prove that there is a misunderstanding and prejudice in the traditional evaluation of "professional painters" by literati painters, which need to be corrected, on the basis of these two points. Gao Jihan has completed the re-understanding and re-evaluation of "professional painters" in the history of Chinese painting, showing a new method and new viewpoint different from the history of Chinese painting.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：J209.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 李維琨;美術(shù)史方法的差異與對(duì)象的差異——《班宗華、高居翰、羅浩通信集》讀后[J];新美術(shù);1989年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：2277055