德里達(dá)的動(dòng)物思想研究
[Abstract]:This article takes Derrida's animal thought as the research object, starting from the philosophical background of the thought, taking the core concept of Derrida's animal thought as the research focus, analyzes the deconstruction strategy contained therein. Then it explains the influence of Derrida's animal thought on the development of literary theory. This paper points out that Derrida's animal thought deeply reflects on the relationship between traditional human beings and animals, emphasizes the necessity of changing the speculative mode of animal philosophy, and reorientates the position of human beings in the ecological community. First of all, Derrida's animal thought has a certain philosophical foundation, he classifies the past philosophers' animal thought into two traditions: first, by emphasizing the difference between animals and human beings, represented by Plato, Aristotle, and Descartes. Highlight the subjectivity of human beings and propagate the ideological tendency of anthropocentrism; Second, Rousseau, Bentham, Nietzsche as the representative of the objective view of the relationship between human beings and animals, by affirming the inherent animality of human beings, questioning the ideological tendency of anthropocentrism. Secondly, Derrida puts forward and interprets the four key concepts of "animal so I am", "autobiographical animal", "boundary logic", "animal other", and reflects on the purpose and significance of human being's pursuit of self throughout history. The essence of western traditional philosophical discourse is the subjugation of animals under the cover of human rules. Thirdly, Derrida adopted the deconstruction strategy to disassemble the three basic propositions of animal naming, animal language and animal rights, and deconstructed anthropocentrism, phonological centrism and logos centralism. Derrida's animal thought is a profound reflection on human self-cognition, expands the theoretical space of ecological criticism, promotes the trend of thought in the ethical turn of literary research, and provides a new critical discourse and theoretical perspective for text interpretation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:I0
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 龍其林;;文學(xué)經(jīng)典與動(dòng)物認(rèn)知——當(dāng)代西方生態(tài)文學(xué)中的動(dòng)物敘事析解[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年02期
2 劉彬;;當(dāng)代西方女性主義動(dòng)物倫理及其困惑[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2015年01期
3 李素杰;;當(dāng)代文學(xué)批評(píng)中的動(dòng)物研究[J];北京第二外國(guó)語(yǔ)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年10期
4 姜禮福;孟慶粉;;英語(yǔ)文學(xué)批評(píng)中的動(dòng)物研究和批評(píng)[J];天津外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年03期
5 喬納森·卡勒;;當(dāng)今的文學(xué)理論[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;2012年04期
6 張劍;;西方文論關(guān)鍵詞 他者[J];外國(guó)文學(xué);2011年01期
7 張羽佳;;當(dāng)?shù)吕镞_(dá)遇見(jiàn)貓——一種關(guān)于動(dòng)物倫理或“人的自傳”的哲學(xué)話語(yǔ)[J];世界哲學(xué);2010年06期
8 張小星;;對(duì)死亡作為死亡的經(jīng)驗(yàn)——關(guān)于《論精神》中動(dòng)物難題的注釋[J];世界哲學(xué);2009年03期
9 黃偉;;西方文學(xué)動(dòng)物敘事的倫理視野[J];求索;2008年12期
10 陳曉明;;動(dòng)物、死刑與死亡的饋贈(zèng)——德里達(dá)思想的后現(xiàn)代幽靈[J];文藝爭(zhēng)鳴;2007年09期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 龐紅蕊;當(dāng)代西方文化語(yǔ)境中的動(dòng)物問(wèn)題[D];北京外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué);2014年
2 陳佳冀;中國(guó)文學(xué)動(dòng)物敘事的生發(fā)和建構(gòu)[D];上海大學(xué);2011年
3 曹麗新;解構(gòu)、友愛(ài)與未來(lái)民主[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 滕鐵鵬;人與動(dòng)物關(guān)系的倫理研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2014年
2 王文采;西方動(dòng)物小說(shuō)中動(dòng)物與人類關(guān)系的生態(tài)批評(píng)解讀[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2011年
3 郭靜雅;彼得·辛格的動(dòng)物解放論[D];上海師范大學(xué);2010年
4 孫濤;德里達(dá)解構(gòu)主義文學(xué)觀[D];山東大學(xué);2008年
5 孫超;卡夫卡中短篇小說(shuō)中的動(dòng)物形象[D];青島大學(xué);2007年
6 王永吉;試析德里達(dá)的解構(gòu)思想及其在當(dāng)代中國(guó)的影響[D];東北師范大學(xué);2007年
7 袁先來(lái);德里達(dá)的解構(gòu)主義研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2003年
,本文編號(hào):2413942
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/wenyilunwen/wenxuepinglunlunwen/2413942.html