發(fā)布時間：2024-06-29 02:08

　　指稱是在一個在語言學(xué)界備受關(guān)注的概念,是現(xiàn)代語言學(xué)研究的一個熱點(diǎn)問題,語言學(xué)家們在語義、語用、認(rèn)知等各自的研究領(lǐng)域內(nèi)建立了相對獨(dú)立的指稱理論,但同時也不可避免地存在局限性。系統(tǒng)功能語言學(xué)家韓禮德和哈桑的研究從的全新角度研究了指稱,并且對語言學(xué)研究產(chǎn)生了深遠(yuǎn)的影響。隨著人們對系統(tǒng)功能言學(xué)研究的更為深入它在語言研究中所蘊(yùn)含的學(xué)術(shù)活力和理論闡釋力也得以由淺及深的逐步體現(xiàn)出來。 雙重指稱顧名思義是兩個指稱同時連續(xù)出現(xiàn)在句子表達(dá)中,在漢語表達(dá)中占有相當(dāng)數(shù)量的比例,然而,語言學(xué)習(xí)者對他們所攜帶的意義和功能的關(guān)注卻少之又少。雙重指稱的范疇界定、結(jié)構(gòu)特征、這個結(jié)構(gòu)實現(xiàn)的人際意義還沒有得到普遍的重視和系統(tǒng)化的研究。本論文將在前人指稱研究的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合評價體系的相關(guān)理論著重分析雙重指稱結(jié)構(gòu)在話語中是如何實現(xiàn)交際功能的。 本論文將在系統(tǒng)功能語法理論的基礎(chǔ)上,首先對雙重指稱進(jìn)行范疇界定并對其結(jié)構(gòu)特征、思維機(jī)制進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的分析和研究,通過定性分析地方法利用數(shù)據(jù)論證其基本存在形式及理據(jù),本論文重點(diǎn)放在利用評價體系三個子系統(tǒng)對雙重指稱結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行分析,闡明它在語篇表達(dá)上如何實現(xiàn)人際功能。旨在通過此項研究,引起語言研究者對...

【文章頁數(shù)】：45 頁

【學(xué)位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
1 Introduction
    1.1 Significance of the Research
    1.2 Research Methods
    1.3 Data Sources and Classification
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
2 Literature Review
    2.1 A Survey of Systemic Functional Grammar
    2.2 Three Metafunctions in Systemic-functional Linguistics
        2.2.1 A Survey of Ideational Function
        2.2.2 A Survey of Textual Function
        2.2.3 A Survey of Interpersonal Function
            2.2.3.1 Mood
            2.2.3.2 Subject
            2.2.3.3 Finite
            2.2.3.4 Residue
            2.2.3.5 Modality
    2.3 A Survey of Appraisal Theory and its Applications
        2.3.1 Attitude
        2.3.2 Engagement
        2.3.3 Graduation
        2.3.4 Applications of Appraisal Theory
    2.4 Summary
3 A Dynamic Study on Reference
    3.1 The Classification of Reference
    3.2 Previous Researches on Personal Reference
    3.3 Previous Researches on Demonstrative Reference
    3.4 Summary
4 Double Reference
    4.1 The Definition of Double Reference
    4.2 Classification of Double Reference
        4.2.1 Double Reference Formed by Metaphor
        4.2.2 Double Reference Structure
    4.3 Summary
5 Analysis of Double Reference Structure under Appraisal Theory
    5.1 Personal Reference+Demonstrative Reference under Attitude
    5.2 Personal Reference+Demonstrative Reference under Engagement
    5.3 Personal Reference+Demonstrative Reference under Graduation
    5.4 Summary
6 Conclusion
    6.1 Major Findings
    6.2 Limitations of the Present Study
Bibliography
Papers Published in the Period of M.A. Education
Acknowledgement



本文編號：3996998