發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-24 21:35

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民事 判決書(shū) 理性　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 本文就我國(guó)民事判決書(shū)的說(shuō)理性的若干全局性、前瞻性問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了系統(tǒng)探討和對(duì)比分析，通過(guò)對(duì)當(dāng)前法院實(shí)務(wù)中民事判決書(shū)說(shuō)理性方面的改革提一些建議，以引發(fā)法官同仁的思考。判決書(shū)是公正司法與法院文明之載體；判決書(shū)的是否說(shuō)理，則是判決書(shū)是否具有公信力和權(quán)威性的根本特征。從我國(guó)法治進(jìn)程角度出發(fā)，從民事判決書(shū)與其他相關(guān)文書(shū)的比較來(lái)看，民事判決書(shū)尤其要求說(shuō)理。同時(shí)，為促進(jìn)民事判決書(shū)說(shuō)理的改進(jìn)，，在司法實(shí)踐中應(yīng)強(qiáng)化法官對(duì)法律規(guī)范的解釋權(quán)，民事判決理由部分對(duì)情理、事理的闡述可以考慮將非正式法律淵源作為民事判決說(shuō)理的依據(jù)；判決說(shuō)理中除應(yīng)運(yùn)用好語(yǔ)言與邏輯之外，可考慮寫(xiě)作“法官后語(yǔ)”。同時(shí)，應(yīng)將法條原文寫(xiě)進(jìn)判決書(shū)中。而裁判文書(shū)中對(duì)法院內(nèi)部不同意見(jiàn)的可以進(jìn)行記載，以增加判決書(shū)的說(shuō)理成分。民事判決書(shū)的說(shuō)理還應(yīng)結(jié)合中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化，注重對(duì)人情、事理的論述。
[Abstract]:This paper makes a systematic discussion and comparative analysis on the overall and forward-looking aspects of the rationality of the civil judgment in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on the reform of the theory of rationality in the civil judgment in the current court practice. The judgment is the carrier of justice and the civilization of the court. Whether the judgment is reasonable or not is the fundamental characteristic of whether the judgment has credibility and authority. From the point of view of the process of rule of law in our country, the judgment is the carrier of justice and the civilization of the court. From the comparison of civil judgment and other relevant documents, civil judgment especially requires reasoning. At the same time, in order to promote the improvement of civil judgment reasoning, judges' power of interpretation of legal norms should be strengthened in judicial practice. The reason of civil judgment is partly to reason, the elaboration of reason may consider the informal legal origin as the basis of civil judgment reasoning. Besides the use of language and logic in judgment reasoning, we may consider writing "the latter language". The original text of the law should be written into the judgment. However, in the judgment document, the dissenting opinions within the court can be recorded in order to increase the reasoning elements of the judgment. The reasoning of the civil judgment should also be combined with the traditional Chinese culture and pay attention to human feelings. A reasoned statement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 趙蓓;民事判決書(shū)規(guī)范化研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 陳勁松;敘事、析理、辯法[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：1531793