發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-25 02:16

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 檢察權(quán) 法律監(jiān)督權(quán) 監(jiān)督制約　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：法治社會(huì)下的任何權(quán)力都必須接受監(jiān)督和制約。當(dāng)前,我國(guó)正朝著社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家不斷邁進(jìn),因此國(guó)家權(quán)力必須接受監(jiān)督和制約。我國(guó)的檢察權(quán)是憲法賦予的法律監(jiān)督權(quán),由檢察機(jī)關(guān)依法獨(dú)立行使,與其他國(guó)家相比,其在行使過(guò)程中有很大的不同,一方面,檢察權(quán)在行使中因監(jiān)督制約而導(dǎo)致檢察權(quán)獨(dú)立性缺乏保障；另一方面,檢察權(quán)又因監(jiān)督制約的缺失導(dǎo)致權(quán)力的濫用。司法實(shí)踐中檢察權(quán)的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制還存在不健全、不完善、不落實(shí)等問(wèn)題。因此,構(gòu)建合理的檢察權(quán)監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制對(duì)于我國(guó)的司法改革,甚至法治進(jìn)程具有重大而深遠(yuǎn)的意義。本文在充分認(rèn)識(shí)我國(guó)檢察權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)上,就檢察權(quán)現(xiàn)行的外部和內(nèi)部監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制進(jìn)行分析,指出其存在的問(wèn)題,并就如何健全和完善檢察權(quán)的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制進(jìn)行研究,為我國(guó)檢察權(quán)監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制的完善提出相關(guān)建議。 本文共分為四部分：第一章檢察權(quán)的起源,本章通過(guò)分析比較兩大法系——大陸法系和英美法系及以蘇聯(lián)為首的社會(huì)主義法系國(guó)家檢察制度的產(chǎn)生過(guò)程,論證檢察權(quán)產(chǎn)生的歷史必然性。第二章我國(guó)檢察權(quán)的定位分析,本章側(cè)重理論分析,通過(guò)闡述我國(guó)檢察制度的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展過(guò)程,分析檢察權(quán)的概念及內(nèi)容,對(duì)我國(guó)的檢察權(quán)進(jìn)行理性定位。第三章檢察權(quán)監(jiān)督制約的價(jià)值分析,本章從三個(gè)方面分析了作為一種法律監(jiān)督權(quán)的檢察權(quán),對(duì)其進(jìn)行監(jiān)督制約的必要性,為下文我國(guó)檢察權(quán)的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制的分析搭建理論平臺(tái)。第四章我國(guó)檢察權(quán)的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制的完善,本章第一節(jié)從權(quán)力制約和權(quán)利制約兩個(gè)角度出發(fā),分析了現(xiàn)行的檢察權(quán)外部監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制,針對(duì)存在的問(wèn)題,提出了相關(guān)建議,以便構(gòu)建完善的檢察權(quán)外部監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制。第二節(jié)從橫向監(jiān)督制約和縱向監(jiān)督制約及強(qiáng)化檢察隊(duì)伍的素質(zhì)方面著手,對(duì)現(xiàn)行檢察權(quán)的內(nèi)部監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制進(jìn)行評(píng)析,并提出相關(guān)完善建議,以期加快建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家的進(jìn)程。
[Abstract]:Any power under the rule of law society must be subject to supervision and restriction. At present, our country is moving towards a socialist country ruled by law, so the state power must be supervised and restricted. Compared with other countries, the procuratorial organs exercise their procuratorial power independently according to law. On the one hand, the exercise of procuratorial power leads to the lack of guarantee of the independence of procuratorial power because of supervision and restriction; on the other hand, The lack of supervision and restriction leads to the abuse of power. In judicial practice, the supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power is still imperfect, imperfect, and not implemented. It is of great and far-reaching significance to construct a reasonable supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power for the judicial reform and even the process of ruling by law in our country. This paper analyzes the existing external and internal supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power, points out its existing problems, and studies how to perfect and perfect the supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power. To improve the supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power in China. This article is divided into four parts: the first chapter of the origin of prosecutorial power, this chapter through the analysis of the two major legal systems-civil law system and Anglo-American law system and the Soviet Union led by the socialist legal system countries procuratorial system process. The second chapter focuses on the analysis of the position of procuratorial power in our country. This chapter focuses on the theoretical analysis, and analyzes the concept and content of procuratorial power by expounding the process of the emergence and development of the procuratorial system in our country. The third chapter analyzes the value of supervision and restriction of procuratorial power. This chapter analyzes the necessity of supervision and restriction of procuratorial power as a kind of legal supervisory power from three aspects. The first section of this chapter sets out from two angles of power restriction and power restriction, which is the improvement of supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power in China in the 4th chapter, which is based on the analysis of supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power in China. This paper analyzes the existing external supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power, and puts forward some relevant suggestions in view of the existing problems. In order to build a perfect external supervision and restriction mechanism of procuratorial power. The second section analyzes the internal supervision and restriction mechanism of the current procuratorial power from the aspects of horizontal and vertical supervision and restriction and strengthening the quality of the procuratorial team. And puts forward the related consummation suggestion, in order to speed up the construction socialism rule of law country's progress.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王幾哈;少數(shù)民族地區(qū)檢察官職業(yè)化建設(shè)研究[D];北京郵電大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1532632