發(fā)布時間：2018-05-17 12:39

  本文選題：行政公益訴訟 + 受案范圍��； 參考：《電子科技大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放三十多年,我國經(jīng)濟突飛猛進。然而,只依靠市場來對經(jīng)濟進行調(diào)節(jié)已不能滿足需要,其缺點也逐漸顯現(xiàn)。因而,政府不斷對人們的經(jīng)濟生活進行干涉,在保護人們的合法權益時,也導致人們的公共利益存在受到政府的行政職權危害的可能。而人們?yōu)榱司S護公共權利不受行政職權的干涉,因而開始逐步采用行政程序來對行政權的行使進行有效規(guī)范。不過,只依靠行政程序的規(guī)范作用并不能達到預期的目標,更需要科學有效的司法保障才能更加有效的保障人們的公共利益。不過,在我國傳統(tǒng)意義上的訴權體系中,由于缺少有效的司法救濟渠道,同時原告的缺乏以及受案范圍的模糊,使得人們很難有效地維護公共利益。因而,公益訴訟成為人們維護公共利益的有效途徑。本篇文章的選題正是出于這樣的考慮,從司法保障的層面來對公共利益進行維護。通常情況下,制度的建立以及發(fā)展均是立足于科學的理論之上,而為了能夠更好地維護人們的公共利益,同時對行政權的行使進行有效的監(jiān)督,完善的行政公益訴訟體系必不可少,相應的制度也急需建立并完善。因此,科學的理論是基礎,理論指導實踐,實踐檢驗理論,而為了使得行政訴訟理論能夠得到完善,就要求我們不斷完善相關的理論,從而構(gòu)建起科學完善的行政公益訴訟體系,從而有效地對公民的合法的公共利益進行維護。本文試圖從以下方面做一些有益的嘗試:從理論的角度來對行政公益訴訟受案范圍的建立進行了系統(tǒng)的剖析,同時對其意義進行了分析。在此之上,還結(jié)合我國的實際情況,對行政公益訴訟相關制度以及受案范圍中的不足進行了徹底的分析,并對此提出了相關的建議。全文共分為六個部分:第一部分主要介紹行政公益訴訟受案范圍的研究背景及研究意義以及本文采用的研究方法。第二部分主要對行政公益訴訟及行政公益訴訟受案范圍的基本理論進行概述,其中包公益訴訟的內(nèi)容及意義,行政公益訴訟受案范圍的概念、特點以及其價值分析。第三部分主要分析了域外的一些國家關于行政公益訴訟理論基礎并對我國的啟發(fā)與借鑒意義。第四部分主要是結(jié)合我國《行政訴訟法》中關于受案范圍的現(xiàn)行立法規(guī)定,對我國的公益訴訟受案范圍中的不足進行了系統(tǒng)地剖析,并聯(lián)系其相應的內(nèi)容以及準則,第五部分對行政公益訴訟的受案范圍,提出了一些具有可操作性的建議。第六部分是結(jié)論,總結(jié)全文的核心觀點。本篇文章研究的核心內(nèi)容是立足于我國行政公益訴訟的發(fā)展情況,對其中的不足,如立法方面等進行了徹底的分析,同時,并運用相關理論,綜合文獻研究以及價值分析兩種方式,來全方位地介紹并分析了我國的行政公益訴訟,對其受案范圍進行了系統(tǒng)地剖析,并在此基礎上,提出了一些具有可操作性的建議。
[Abstract]:Reform and opening up for more than 30 years, China's economy by leaps and bounds. However, only relying on the market to adjust the economy can no longer meet the needs, its shortcomings have gradually emerged. As a result, the government constantly interferes with people's economic life, while protecting people's legitimate rights and interests, it also leads to the possibility that the public interests of people are endangered by the government's administrative power. In order to protect public rights from interference of administrative power, people began to use administrative procedure to regulate the exercise of administrative power. However, only relying on the normative role of administrative procedures can not achieve the desired goal, but also need scientific and effective judicial protection to protect people's public interests more effectively. However, in the traditional litigation system of our country, because of the lack of effective judicial relief channels, the lack of plaintiff and the ambiguity of the scope of the case, it is difficult for people to effectively safeguard the public interest. Therefore, public interest litigation has become an effective way for people to safeguard the public interest. The topic of this article is based on such considerations, from the level of judicial protection to safeguard the public interest. Usually, the establishment and development of the system are based on the scientific theory, and in order to better safeguard the public interests of people, at the same time, the exercise of executive power to carry on effective supervision, The perfect administrative public interest litigation system is indispensable, the corresponding system also urgently needs to establish and consummate. Therefore, the scientific theory is the foundation, the theory guides the practice, the practice tests the theory, but in order to make the administrative litigation theory to be able to be consummated, requires us to continuously consummate the related theory, In order to establish a scientific and perfect administrative public interest litigation system, and effectively safeguard the legitimate public interests of citizens. This paper attempts to do some useful attempts from the following aspects: from the theoretical point of view, the establishment of the scope of administrative public interest litigation cases is systematically analyzed, and its significance is analyzed. On this basis, combined with the actual situation of our country, this paper makes a thorough analysis on the relevant system of administrative public interest litigation and the shortcomings in the scope of receiving cases, and puts forward some relevant suggestions. This paper is divided into six parts: the first part mainly introduces the research background and significance of the scope of administrative public interest litigation cases and the research methods adopted in this paper. The second part mainly summarizes the basic theory of administrative public interest litigation and the scope of administrative public interest litigation, including the content and significance of public interest litigation, the concept, characteristics and value analysis of the scope of administrative public interest litigation. The third part mainly analyzes the theoretical basis of administrative public interest litigation in some foreign countries and enlightens and uses for reference for our country. The fourth part mainly analyzes the shortcomings of the scope of public interest litigation in our country by combining the current legislative provisions of the scope of accepting cases in the Administrative Litigation Law of our country, and connects with its corresponding contents and standards. The fifth part puts forward some operable suggestions on the scope of administrative public interest litigation. The sixth part is the conclusion, summarizes the core point of view of the full text. The core content of this article is based on the development of administrative public interest litigation in our country, and makes a thorough analysis of its shortcomings, such as legislative aspects, at the same time, using relevant theories. By synthesizing the literature research and value analysis, this paper introduces and analyzes the administrative public interest litigation in our country in all directions, and systematically analyzes the scope of accepting cases, and puts forward some operable suggestions on this basis.
【學位授予單位】：電子科技大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.3
，

本文編號：1901411