綁架罪法益問(wèn)題研究
[Abstract]:Kidnapping is a kind of traditional and typical serious violent crime. In China, where the economy is developing rapidly, the occurrence of kidnapping cases can still attract extensive attention from all walks of life. Since the establishment of the criminal law in 1997, the crime of kidnapping has gone through two amendments to the criminal law. The frequent changes in legislation also reflect that there are a lot of disputes caused by the crime of kidnapping, both in the theoretical and practical circles, have maintained a high degree of attention to many controversial issues of the crime of kidnapping. Since studying in graduate school, the author has had a strong interest in the theoretical problem of kidnapping crime. The author believes that among the many theoretical disputes of kidnapping crime, the core and most valuable one is the legal interest of kidnapping crime. The crime of kidnapping produces all kinds of disputes, first of all, because the source of legal interest is controversial. Only by clarifying and defining the connotation of the legal interest of kidnapping crime can we further solve the problems such as the dispute of single reply behavior of kidnapping crime and the essence of purpose crime. In addition, it can also better guide the judicial practice of similar charges are difficult to define and so on. Whether it is to reveal the theoretical loophole of the legal interest of kidnapping crime, or to give full play to the function of legal interest in the judicial practice of kidnapping crime, we must first establish the premise and basic position of this paper. This basic position includes two aspects: the first is to investigate the cultural background and institutional history of kidnapping crime. From ancient times to the present China, there are not only the history of institutional change of kidnapping legislation, but also the investigation of humanistic and social environmental factors behind the legislation, such as the doctrine of severe punishment inherited by feudal legal system. The second is to explain the emergence and development of the current legal interest theory in China, which is based on the investigation of the history of a theory, and also includes the introduction and exposition of the connotation and function of the legal interest. The combination of these two aspects can comprehensively and profoundly reflect the knowledge background and theoretical premise of the legal interest of kidnapping crime. On the premise of establishing the basic position, the legal interest of kidnapping crime is deconstructed theoretically. By analyzing and comparing many different viewpoints of the current theory of legal interest of kidnapping crime, a more scientific theory in the theory of single legal interest is gradually established. This comparative analysis is shown by the logical inconsistency of each theory. On this basis, through the interpretation of the legal interests of kidnapping crime and the analysis of the causes of logical dislocation caused by felony, the main reasons for the predicament of legal interests in kidnapping crime are basically found out. While deconstructing the causes of the theoretical differences in the legal interest of kidnapping crime, it also gradually combs and presents the theoretical construction path of the legal interest of kidnapping crime. First of all, through the theoretical exposition, the basic connotation of the legal interest of kidnapping crime is established, which includes not only the exposition based on the perspective of behavioral means, but also the substantive investigation based on the alternative relationship of legal interest protection. The ultimate purpose of the theoretical construction is to better guide the judicial practice. Therefore, on the basis of clarifying the connotation of the legal interest, through the comparative analysis of the interpretation of the legal interest stipulated in paragraph 2 of the crime of kidnapping and other similar charges, the function of guiding and explaining the constituent elements of the crime of kidnapping is basically realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D924.3
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王文祖,申屠青;從兩案看綁架罪與搶劫罪的區(qū)別[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年05期
2 姚劍;;綁架罪? 還是以搶劫罪和綁架罪實(shí)行數(shù)罪并罰?[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(上旬刊);2008年12期
3 陳如春,甄麗君;彭某等人構(gòu)成綁架罪[J];天津市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期
4 王宗光;論綁架罪的認(rèn)定[J];法律適用;2000年05期
5 肖俊德,樊洪;略論綁架罪的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];中州學(xué)刊;2000年06期
6 田宏杰,許成磊;海峽兩岸綁架罪之比較研究[J];云南法學(xué);2000年02期
7 肖中華;;關(guān)于綁架罪的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];法學(xué)家;2000年02期
8 王超杰,李冬梅;論綁架罪的認(rèn)定[J];福建公安高等�?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào).社會(huì)公共安全研究;2001年06期
9 杜國(guó)強(qiáng);綁架罪若干問(wèn)題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2001年06期
10 夏強(qiáng);綁架罪質(zhì)疑[J];浙江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 朱明鎖;綁架罪的主體及其定罪量刑[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2000年
2 朱奎;綁架女兒勒索妻子 是否構(gòu)成綁架罪[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2005年
3 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)所研究員 曾慶敏;綁架罪疑難問(wèn)題淺析[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2002年
4 豐誠(chéng)福邋何愛(ài)國(guó);綁架罪疑難問(wèn)題解析[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
5 江西省高級(jí)人民法院 居國(guó)屏邋湯媛媛;本案應(yīng)以強(qiáng)奸罪和綁架罪數(shù)罪并罰[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年
6 記者 陳麗平;綁架罪最低刑不宜降低為三年[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
7 趙秉志 趙遠(yuǎn);試論綁架罪的立法完善[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年
8 上海市青浦區(qū)人民檢察院 陳海燕;“不法要求”并非人質(zhì)型綁架罪的構(gòu)罪條件[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年
9 記者 王麗麗;綁架罪三年起刑偏輕[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2008年
10 重慶市江北區(qū)人民法院 付鳴劍 最高人民法院 �?饲�;本案構(gòu)成搶劫罪還是綁架罪[N];人民法院報(bào);2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 馮玉東;對(duì)綁架罪和搶劫罪界限的探析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年
2 葛依然;“人質(zhì)型”搶劫的性質(zhì)界定[D];蘇州大學(xué);2015年
3 黃嬌嬌;綁架罪司法認(rèn)定研究[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2014年
4 周超;綁架罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[D];安徽財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2017年
5 趙晨翔;綁架罪加重構(gòu)成條款的再研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2017年
6 陳建武;論綁架罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年
7 程文超;綁架罪法益問(wèn)題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年
8 虎文博;論綁架罪的實(shí)行行為[D];吉林大學(xué);2017年
9 任崢;綁架罪司法疑難問(wèn)題研究[D];貴州大學(xué);2008年
10 蘇宇;綁架罪疑難問(wèn)題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2008年
,本文編號(hào):2510824
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2510824.html