發(fā)布時間：2018-03-25 04:28

  本文選題：家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)　切入點：繼承權(quán)　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：一國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的根基是農(nóng)業(yè),農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展的根基是土地,因此對農(nóng)村土地的規(guī)制就顯得極其重要。在此背景下,我國家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度產(chǎn)生并不斷完善,為推動我國土地開發(fā)、維護社會的穩(wěn)定及保障我國農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟乃至整個社會經(jīng)濟迅速、健康發(fā)展做出了重要的貢獻(xiàn)。但是,該制度并不是完美無缺的。我國立法者在創(chuàng)設(shè)該制度時,對家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)能否繼承并未給出明確的、完美的答案,以至于理論界和實務(wù)界對此問題爭議頗大。從而導(dǎo)致了一系列問題的產(chǎn)生,例如司法實踐中家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承糾紛層出不窮、紛繁復(fù)雜。這對法制的發(fā)展和完善、社會穩(wěn)定等都是非常不利的,我們必須對家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)能否繼承做出明確的規(guī)定。本文圍繞家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承展開,從我國目前家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承的立法現(xiàn)狀著手,并深入分析這一現(xiàn)狀產(chǎn)生的原因。主要是從立法者立法時的法律考量分析。然后從法律體系的統(tǒng)一性、家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的財產(chǎn)屬性、“三權(quán)分離”理論的發(fā)展、土地市場化需求這些方面探究了家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承的必要性;從社會實踐以及農(nóng)地權(quán)利流轉(zhuǎn)的大趨勢、社會保障制度的完善為家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承制度的確立提供基礎(chǔ)和保障分析了家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承制度的可行性。提出為完善家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度、減少繼承糾紛、促進農(nóng)村社會發(fā)展以及我國法治進程,我們必須構(gòu)建完善的家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承制度。構(gòu)建該制度主要從家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承關(guān)系主體、客體、繼承方式進行著手。具體來說就是明確家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承關(guān)系中,被繼承人是“戶”內(nèi)的每個家庭成員,而非農(nóng)戶;本集體經(jīng)濟組織成員和非集體經(jīng)濟組織成員都可以成為繼承人,但是為保持農(nóng)地用途,非集體經(jīng)濟組織成員必須取得原發(fā)包方的同意,才能實際繼承承包經(jīng)營權(quán);明確土地只是載體,并不是繼承關(guān)系的客體,從家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)中分離出的經(jīng)營權(quán)才是繼承關(guān)系的真正客體;明確家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的兩種繼承方式,即法定繼承和遺囑繼承。在具體的規(guī)則設(shè)計上,提出“最小耕作面積”規(guī)則并賦予繼承人選擇權(quán)(選擇折價補償或單獨或共同享有相同土地上的家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán))。家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承制度的確立,從長遠(yuǎn)來看,是大勢所趨,是我國社會經(jīng)濟市場化程度提升、人們財產(chǎn)意識提高、完善法律體系的必然要求和必要選擇;而對當(dāng)前的社會生活和司法實踐也具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義,確保家庭承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承糾紛有統(tǒng)一、明確的法律裁判標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。
[Abstract]:The foundation of a country's economic development is agriculture, and the foundation of agricultural development is land. Therefore, the regulation of rural land is extremely important. Maintaining social stability and ensuring the rapid and healthy development of our country's rural economy and the whole society have made important contributions. However, the system is not perfect. There is no clear and perfect answer as to whether the right of household contract management can be inherited, so that there is a lot of controversy in the theoretical and practical circles, which leads to a series of problems. For example, in judicial practice, disputes over inheritance of the right to contract management of families emerge in endlessly and are complicated. This is very unfavorable to the development and improvement of the legal system and social stability. We must make clear provisions on whether the right of household contracted management can be inherited. This article focuses on the inheritance of the right of household contract management, starting with the current legislative situation of inheritance of the right of household contract management in our country. And deeply analyze the reasons of this situation, mainly from the legislative considerations of the legislator. Then from the unity of the legal system, the property attributes of the right to contract management of the family, the development of the theory of "separation of the three powers". This paper probes into the necessity of inheritance of the right of household contracted management from the aspects of market demand of land, the trend of social practice and the circulation of farmland rights. The perfection of the social security system provides the basis for the establishment of the inheritance system of the family contract management right and analyzes the feasibility of the family contract management right inheritance system. To promote the development of rural society and the process of ruling by law in our country, we must construct a perfect inheritance system of the right of household contracted management. The way of inheritance is carried out. Specifically, it is clear that in the inheritance relationship of the right of household contracted management, the heirs are each family member in "household", not farmers; The members of this collective economic organization and the members of the non-collective economic organization may become heirs, but in order to maintain the use of agricultural land, the members of the non-collective economic organizations must obtain the consent of the original contracting party before they can actually inherit the contractual management right; It is clear that land is only the carrier, not the object of the inheritance relationship, and that the management right separated from the family contract management right is the real object of the inheritance relationship. That is, legal succession and testate succession. In the design of specific rules, This paper puts forward the rule of "minimum cultivated area" and gives the heirs the right to choose (choose discount compensation or enjoy the same land alone or jointly). In the long run, it is the trend of the times to establish the inheritance system of the right of household contracted management. It is the inevitable requirement and necessary choice to improve the social economy marketization degree, the people's property consciousness, the perfect legal system, and also has the important realistic significance to the current social life and the judicial practice. Ensure the family contract management right inheritance dispute has the unification, the clear legal judgment standard.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 余紅;劉玉秀;;我國農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承問題探析[J];成都理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2016年04期

2 陳u&;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承機制及其闡釋辨證[J];清華法學(xué);2016年03期

3 鄒愛文;許志敏;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承問題研究[J];法制與社會;2015年27期

4 劉敏;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承的解釋論——兼評《最高人民法院公報》所載“李維祥訴李格梅繼承權(quán)案”[J];政治與法律;2014年11期

5 汪洋;;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)繼承問題研究——對現(xiàn)行規(guī)范的法構(gòu)造闡釋與法政策考量[J];清華法學(xué);2014年04期

6 朱廣新;;論土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的主體、期限和繼承[J];吉林大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2014年04期

7 王洪平;;論征地補償費的繼承[J];煙臺大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2014年02期

8 郭明瑞;;也談農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的繼承問題——兼與劉保玉教授商榷[J];北方法學(xué);2014年02期

9 劉凱湘;;論農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的可繼承性[J];北方法學(xué);2014年02期

10 汪洋;;集體土地所有權(quán)的三重功能屬性——基于羅馬氏族與我國農(nóng)村集體土地的比較分析[J];比較法研究;2014年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 楊光;我國農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)法律問題研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2013年

2 王金堂;土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)制度的困局與解破[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔡翊;論農(nóng)村土地承包經(jīng)營權(quán)的繼承[D];華南理工大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號：1661563