發(fā)布時間：2018-03-26 18:42

  本文選題：抽象行政行為　切入點：司法審查　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：在中國法治進程不斷加快的背景下，建立對抽象行政行為司法審查制度的呼聲越來越高。抽象行政行為是做出具體行政行為的依據(jù)，在我國現(xiàn)有法律制度下是不被納入行政訴訟審查范圍的，而在現(xiàn)實情況下許多抽象行政行為存在違法之處，但法律沒有授權(quán)法院去審查，造成行政相對人權(quán)利受到抽象行政行為侵害后無法訴諸于法律途徑解決，這是不符合約束行政權(quán)力和保護公民權(quán)利的法治精神。本文通過案例分析和理論的闡述，分析了我國建立抽象行政行為司法審查制度的必要性，并對抽象行政行為的司法審查制度的可行性基礎(chǔ)進行分析，從而設(shè)計出相關(guān)的法律程序，，構(gòu)建符合我國國情的抽象行政行為司法審查制度。
[Abstract]:Under the background of speeding up the process of rule of law in China, the voice of establishing judicial review system of abstract administrative act is increasing. Abstract administrative act is the basis of making concrete administrative act. Under the current legal system of our country, it is not included in the scope of administrative litigation review, but in reality, many abstract administrative acts are illegal, but the law does not authorize the court to review. It is inconsistent with the spirit of the rule of law to restrain administrative power and protect civil rights, which can't be solved by legal means after the rights of administrative counterpart are infringed by abstract administrative action. This paper analyzes the necessity of establishing the judicial review system of abstract administrative act in our country, and analyzes the feasibility basis of judicial review system of abstract administrative act, so as to design the relevant legal procedure. To construct the judicial review system of abstract administrative action in accordance with the national conditions of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D922.1;D925.3

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 張明楷;;法條競合中特別關(guān)系的確定與處理[J];法學(xué)家;2011年01期

2 蔣惠嶺;我國實現(xiàn)獨立審判的條件與出路[J];人民司法;1998年03期

3 吳忠民;公正新論[J];中國社會科學(xué);2000年04期

4 董v

本文編號：1669110