發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-05-27 03:51

　　本研究采用弗蘭德斯互動(dòng)分析法,用時(shí)間抽樣的辦法,對(duì)比分析中外籍英語教師課堂互動(dòng)模式的異同。通過調(diào)查問卷和訪談,探討學(xué)生對(duì)中外籍英語教師課堂互動(dòng)模式的滿意程度,并分析了課堂互動(dòng)模式與學(xué)生滿意度的相關(guān)性。本研究回答了以下三個(gè)主要問題:(1)中外籍英語教師課堂互動(dòng)模式是否存在差異?(2)學(xué)生對(duì)中外籍英語教師課堂互動(dòng)模式的滿意度是否存在差異?(3)課堂互動(dòng)模式與學(xué)生滿意度之間是否存在關(guān)系?本研究選取一所開展外教課程且擁有優(yōu)質(zhì)師生資源的小學(xué)為研究案例。通過校長推薦,與各位老師進(jìn)行協(xié)商溝通后,該小學(xué)的3個(gè)高年級(jí)(五、六年級(jí))班級(jí)全體學(xué)生及其中外籍英語教師參與了該研究。通過弗蘭德斯互動(dòng)分析系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行課堂觀察,依照改良版的編碼記錄課堂行為后,將編碼錄入表格以及矩陣,分析課堂中教師授課、學(xué)生討論、師生問答、師生交流協(xié)商等行為的占比,從而分別總結(jié)出中外籍教師課堂互動(dòng)模式并進(jìn)行對(duì)比。為確保研究的客觀性,本研究根據(jù)弗蘭德斯編碼以及Wubbles提出的教師互動(dòng)行為量表設(shè)計(jì)了“教師互動(dòng)行為的調(diào)查問卷”以及與其相對(duì)應(yīng)的“學(xué)生互動(dòng)滿意度的調(diào)查問卷”,經(jīng)過信度、效度檢驗(yàn)后,投入使用,使用SPSS17.0軟件分析數(shù)據(jù)。在數(shù)...

【文章頁數(shù)】：92 頁

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
ABBRIVIATIONS
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Study
    1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Studies on Classroom Interaction
        2.1.1 Definition and Classifications of Classroom Interaction
        2.1.2 Studies on Characteristics of Classroom Interaction
        2.1.3 Studies on Classroom Interaction Strategy and Design
        2.1.4 Studies on Influence Factors of Classroom Interaction
        2.1.5 Studies on Classroom Interaction Mode
        2.1.6 Flanders Interaction Analysis System
    2.2 Studies on Student Satisfaction in Classroom
    2.3 Comparative Studies on Interaction Modes between NESTs and NNESTs
    2.4 Studies on Interaction Hypothesis
    2.5 Research Gaps and Research Questions
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Three Methodology
    3.1 Participants
        3.1.1 Profile of the Participants
        3.1.2 Selection of the Participants
    3.2 Instruments
        3.2.1 Flanders Interaction Analysis System
        3.2.2 Questionnaire
        3.2.3 Interview
    3.3 Data Collection
        3.3.1 Classroom Observation
        3.3.2 Implementing Questionnaires and Interviews
    3.4 Data Analysis
        3.4.1 Transcription of the FIAS Codes
            3.4.1.1 Ratio Analysis
            3.4.1.2 Matrix Analysis
        3.4.2 Data Processing of the Questionnaires
        3.4.3 Transcription of the Interview
    3.5 Summary
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 The Differences between NEST and NNEST in Classroom Interaction Mode
        4.1.1 Results and Discussion of Classroom Observation
        4.1.2 Results and Discussion of Teacher Interaction Behavior Questionnaire
    4.2 Students’ Satisfaction towards the Classroom Interaction Modes of NESTsand NNESTs
        4.2.1 Results and Discussion of Students’ Satisfaction Questionnaire
        4.2.2 Results and Discussion of Structured Interview
    4.3 The Relationship between Classroom Interaction Mode and Students’Satisfaction
    4.4 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings of the Study
    5.2 Implications of the Study
    5.3 Limitations of the Study
    5.4 Suggestions for Future Study
Bibliography
Appendix Ⅰ
Appendix Ⅱ
Appendix Ⅲ
Appendix Ⅳ
攻讀學(xué)位期間取得的學(xué)術(shù)成果
Acknowledgements



本文編號(hào)：3982736