嵌入歷史:中國資本在非洲的運作邏輯——以坦桑尼亞某中資企業(yè)為例
發(fā)布時間:2018-10-14 13:02
【摘要】:目前關于中國在非投資的研究呈現(xiàn)為西方中心主義、以中國為中心、全球體系三類視角的敘事格局,而有關非洲本土歷史的視角較少。為此,本文基于坦桑尼亞一家中資企業(yè)及所在劍麻產(chǎn)業(yè)的發(fā)展歷史,深入分析了該公司的運作邏輯中受到的當?shù)貏β榘l(fā)展歷史的影響。本文認為,中國資本"走出去"的過程也是嵌入東道國當?shù)貧v史的過程,中國資本延續(xù)了坦桑尼亞劍麻產(chǎn)業(yè)百年來形成的基本范式,體現(xiàn)在生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營方式的選擇、勞動力短缺的應對和資本的積累方式三個維度。雖然中國資本帶來了一些新的元素,但沒有結(jié)構(gòu)性改變,因為坦桑尼亞劍麻產(chǎn)業(yè)基本范式的背后是始于殖民時期并一直持續(xù)的西方國家主導下的"中心—外圍"的國際政治經(jīng)濟格局。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on Chinese investment in Africa presents a narrative pattern of Western centralism, with China as the center and global system as the perspective, while the perspective on African indigenous history is less. Therefore, based on the development history of a Chinese enterprise in Tanzania and its sisal industry, this paper deeply analyzes the influence of the local sisal development history in the operation logic of the company. This paper holds that the process of "going out" of Chinese capital is also a process of embedding the local history of the host country, and that Chinese capital continues the basic paradigm formed by Tanzania's sisal industry over the past hundred years, which is reflected in the choice of production and management mode. The coping of labor shortage and the way of capital accumulation are three dimensions. Although Chinese capital has brought some new elements, there has been no structural change. Behind the basic paradigm of Tanzania's sisal industry is the "center-periphery" international political and economic pattern, which began during the colonial period and continued under the domination of the western countries.
【作者單位】: 中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學人文與發(fā)展學院;
【基金】:國家社會科學基金項目“多元主體共同參與中國對非援助機制研究”(16BGJ021) 中央高校基本科研業(yè)務費專項(2017RW002)階段性成果
【分類號】:F125;F279.2
,
本文編號:2270535
[Abstract]:At present, the research on Chinese investment in Africa presents a narrative pattern of Western centralism, with China as the center and global system as the perspective, while the perspective on African indigenous history is less. Therefore, based on the development history of a Chinese enterprise in Tanzania and its sisal industry, this paper deeply analyzes the influence of the local sisal development history in the operation logic of the company. This paper holds that the process of "going out" of Chinese capital is also a process of embedding the local history of the host country, and that Chinese capital continues the basic paradigm formed by Tanzania's sisal industry over the past hundred years, which is reflected in the choice of production and management mode. The coping of labor shortage and the way of capital accumulation are three dimensions. Although Chinese capital has brought some new elements, there has been no structural change. Behind the basic paradigm of Tanzania's sisal industry is the "center-periphery" international political and economic pattern, which began during the colonial period and continued under the domination of the western countries.
【作者單位】: 中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學人文與發(fā)展學院;
【基金】:國家社會科學基金項目“多元主體共同參與中國對非援助機制研究”(16BGJ021) 中央高校基本科研業(yè)務費專項(2017RW002)階段性成果
【分類號】:F125;F279.2
,
本文編號:2270535
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/jingjilunwen/zhengzhijingjixuelunwen/2270535.html
最近更新
教材專著