發(fā)布時間：2018-03-31 02:34

  本文選題：自己　切入點：漢語反身代詞　出處：《山東大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：反身代詞的研究是語言學領域一個頗具爭議的話題。根據(jù)喬姆斯基的約束理論,照應語必須在本管轄語域內受到約束,但漢語反身代詞"自己"可以且經�？缭狡渌�在的管轄語域受到約束,這違背了約束理論的限制條件。許多語言學家發(fā)現(xiàn)了這一問題并對約束理論同漢語照應語的適應性展開了激烈的討論,他們從句法學、語用學、語義學等不同層面對"自己"的理解進行了理論解釋和規(guī)則提煉,取得了豐碩的成果,先后提出了參數(shù)化分析法、邏輯移位說、新格賴斯語用學分析法等理論方法,但是這些理論在解釋"自己"的用法過程中均存在或多或少的缺陷。近年來越來越多研究者開始關注語義因素對"自己"的理解所產生的影響,他們發(fā)現(xiàn)動詞的語義指向或者主語的性質會影響"自己"的理解結果,但現(xiàn)有的研究僅限于理論討論階段,研究結果有待實驗的具體驗證,此外,除了動詞與主語,句中還有其他語義成分如主語修飾語、動詞修飾語等,這些成分對"自己"的理解所產生的影響也有待考察。為了更加全面地考察語義因素對"自己"的理解所產生的影響,本研究從組合原則出發(fā),開展了一項心理語言學實驗來驗證動詞、主語修飾語和動詞修飾語是否會影響自己的理解以及探究這三類語義成分是如何影響這一語言加工過程的。調查采用紙筆測驗的方式,以自制測試卷為測試工具,選擇52名研究生來進行72個實驗句的先行詞判斷測驗,每個實驗句均包含反身代詞"自己"和兩個候選先行詞,實驗后采用卡方檢驗的方式進行數(shù)據(jù)分析。測驗結果驗證了語義成分確實會影響"自己"的理解,而且語義指向不同的成分對"自己"的理解結果影響也不同。外指向動詞通常引導"自己"指向距其較遠的先行詞,內指向動詞則引導"自己"指向距其較近的先行詞,多指向動詞通常引導"自己"指向距其較遠的先行詞;外指向形容詞通常引導"自己"指向距其較遠的先行詞,內指向形容詞和多指向形容詞不能引導"自己"選擇唯一一個名詞短語作為其先行語;外指向副詞通常引導"自己"指向距其較遠的先行詞,內指向副詞則引導"自己"指向距其較近的先行詞,多指向副詞不能引導"自己"選擇唯一一個名詞短語作為其先行語。這些發(fā)現(xiàn)證明了句法操作不是語言加工的唯一決定標準,語義操作同樣會影響語言加工并且反作用于傳統(tǒng)句法操作。此外,句法結構與語義影響強度會影響語義成分對"自己"的理解所產生的作用。
[Abstract]:The study of reflexive pronouns is a controversial topic in the field of linguistics. According to Chomsky's constraint theory, anaphora must be restricted in this jurisdiction. However, the Chinese reflexive pronoun "oneself" can and is often restricted across its jurisdiction register. Many linguists have discovered this problem and launched a heated discussion on the adaptability of constraint theory to Chinese anaphora. Semantics and other different levels of understanding of "oneself" have been theoretical interpretation and rule refining, and have achieved fruitful results, have put forward the parameterized analysis method, logical shift theory, new Grice pragmatic analysis and other theoretical methods. In recent years, more and more researchers have begun to pay more and more attention to the influence of semantic factors on the understanding of "oneself". They found that the semantic direction of the verb or the nature of the subject will affect the understanding of "oneself", but the existing research is limited to the stage of theoretical discussion, and the results of the study need to be verified by experiments, in addition to verbs and subjects. There are other semantic elements in the sentence, such as subject modifier, verb modifier and so on. The influence of these elements on the understanding of "oneself" also needs to be examined. Based on the principle of combination, this study conducted a psycholinguistic experiment to verify verbs. Whether the subject modifier and the verb modifier affect their understanding and how the three semantic components affect the processing of the language. Fifty-two graduate students were selected to test the antecedents of 72 experimental sentences. Each sentence contained the reflexive pronoun "oneself" and two candidate antecedents. After the experiment, chi-square test was used to analyze the data. Moreover, different elements of semantic pointing have different effects on the understanding of "oneself". External directional verbs usually guide "oneself" to the antecedents farther away from them, while internal pointing verbs lead to "oneself" pointing to antecedents closer to them. A multi-directional verb usually leads "oneself" to a antecedent farther away from it, and an external pointing adjective usually directs "oneself" to a distant antecedent. Internal and multi-directional adjectives cannot lead "oneself" to choose only one noun phrase as its antecedent, while external adverbs usually lead to "oneself" pointing to antecedents which are far away from them. The inner pointing adverbs lead "oneself" to the antecedents that are closer to them. Multi-point adverbs cannot lead "oneself" to choose only one noun phrase as its antecedent. These findings prove that syntactic manipulation is not the only criterion for language processing. Semantic manipulation also affects language processing and counteracts to traditional syntactic manipulation. In addition, syntactic structure and semantic influence intensity will affect the effect of semantic components on the understanding of "oneself".
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：H146.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前7條

1 錢晶晶;吳芙蕓;;約束原則A在漢語復合反身代詞加工中的優(yōu)先制約效應[J];現(xiàn)代外語;2016年04期

2 張璐;趙曼;;邏輯語義學中的組合原則[J];重慶理工大學學報(社會科學);2014年09期

3 彭家法;;當代語義研究熱點和動態(tài)謂詞邏輯的解決方案[J];外語學刊;2012年02期

4 鄭眾;劉振前;;論現(xiàn)代漢語反身代詞“自己”的動態(tài)照應——基于組合性原則[J];山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年03期

5 鄒崇理;;組合原則[J];邏輯學研究;2008年01期

6 鄒崇理;雷建國;;論形式語義學[J];重慶工學院學報(社會科學版);2007年11期

7 胡建華,潘海華;NP顯著性的計算與漢語反身代詞“自己”的指稱[J];當代語言學;2002年01期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 鄭眾;現(xiàn)代漢語反身代詞“自己”的動態(tài)照應研究[D];山東大學;2011年

2 邱明波;動詞的指向對漢語第三人稱代詞和反身代詞的句內回指的制約[D];復旦大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1688801