發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-06-15 02:13

　　互動(dòng)元話語(yǔ)因其勸說(shuō)性和影響力而體現(xiàn)出獨(dú)特的交互品質(zhì)。不同于交互元話語(yǔ),Hyland(2005b)認(rèn)為互動(dòng)元話語(yǔ)更注重其對(duì)認(rèn)知命題態(tài)度的表達(dá)和作者與讀者之間的互動(dòng),而交互元話語(yǔ)更強(qiáng)調(diào)邏輯和語(yǔ)篇的組織。因而,互動(dòng)元話語(yǔ)常因其善于構(gòu)建語(yǔ)篇的人際意義并提高讀者信任和語(yǔ)篇參與度,而在各類學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)篇中得到了廣泛的研究和應(yīng)用。然而,以往研究多集中于單一語(yǔ)種學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)篇的對(duì)比,多語(yǔ)種間對(duì)比較少。而且,他們多集中于研究論文的某一部分,缺少綜合性的多部分對(duì)比研究。研究論文因其獨(dú)特的IMRD結(jié)構(gòu)(介紹-方法-結(jié)果-討論)而凸顯于類型眾多的學(xué)術(shù)語(yǔ)篇。而其方法部分之后的語(yǔ)篇因更接近于研究論文的尾聲,常被視為作者贏得讀者信任并建立自己學(xué)術(shù)聲譽(yù)的最后一次機(jī)會(huì),因而會(huì)包含更多元話語(yǔ)也更易于研究。并且,對(duì)比本族語(yǔ)者的寫作相較于第二語(yǔ)言來(lái)說(shuō),更有助于排除其他影響因素并保證數(shù)據(jù)的獨(dú)立性。出于以上因素的考量,本研究集中于三個(gè)研究問(wèn)題。它們分別是英漢研究論文中互動(dòng)元話語(yǔ)使用差異、造成該差異的原因及其對(duì)構(gòu)建語(yǔ)篇人際意義的影響因素等。為了確保數(shù)據(jù)的可比性,70篇英漢研究論文(方法后的結(jié)構(gòu))組成了本研究自建的語(yǔ)料庫(kù)的主體�？傋�?jǐn)?shù)共計(jì)為33...

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：95 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
Abstract
摘要
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Study
    1.2 Objective of the Study
    1.3 Significance of the Study
    1.4 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Interactional Metadiscourse
        2.1.1 An Overview of Metadiscourse
        2.1.2 Issues of Interactional Metadiscourse
        2.1.3 Previous Studies on Interactional Metadiscourse
    2.2 Interpersonal Meaning
        2.2.1 An Overview of Interpersonal Meaning
        2.2.2 Interactional Metadiscourse and Interpersonal Meaning
        2.2.3 Previous Studies on Interpersonal Meaning
    2.3 Research Articles
        2.3.1 Features of Research Articles
        2.3.2 Interpersonal Meaning in Research Articles
        2.3.3 Previous Studies on Research Articles
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation and Research Methodology
    3.1 Theoretical Foundation
        3.1.1 Theories of Metadiscourse and Interpersonal Meaning
        3.1.2 Analytical Framework
    3.2 Research Methodology
        3.2.1 Corpus Construction
        3.2.2 Data Coding and Analysis
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
    4.1 Difference of Interactional Metadiscourse
        4.1.1 Hedges
        4.1.2 Boosters
        4.1.3 Attitude Markers
        4.1.4 Engagement Markers
        4.1.5 Self-mentions
    4.2 Difference of Metadiscoursal Effect on Interpersonal Meaning
        4.2.1 Projection of Identity
        4.2.2 Involvement with Readers
        4.2.3 Comprehension of Discourse
    4.3 Difference of Influencing Factors on the Construction of Interactional Metadiscourse
        4.3.1 Variation in Communicative Norms
        4.3.2 Variation in Cultural Values
        4.3.3 Variation in Academic Development
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications of the Study
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions
References
Appendix I Marker List of Interactional Metadiscourse
Appendix II Research Articles in the Self-built Corpus
Acknowledgement



本文編號(hào)：3994769