發(fā)布時間：2024-06-29 04:40

　　極性敏感是人類語言的共性。人類語言中普遍存在極性詞或極性表達手段。漢語中的“都”一般在“連……都”結構中被認為有極性敏感,可以構建普通名詞的極性義。對于中文比較結構“A比B都W”的研究,還未曾涉及極性敏感的角度。本文從極性敏感的角度出發(fā),基于極性敏感理論、梯級模型理論與陳麗萍(2012)對“都”作為分配算子和梯級算子的分析,對比較句結構“A比B都W”中“都”的極性敏感進行探究。根據比較后項B的性質不同,本文將“A比B都W”分為三類進行分析,分別是:當B是疑問代詞時,當B是本身具有極性義的名詞時,和當B是不含極性義的普通名詞時。得出結論如下:首先,只有當比較后項B是不含極性義的普通名詞時,“都”具有極性敏感,而當比較后項B是疑問代詞和本身具有極性義的名詞時,“都”與極性敏感無關。其次,“都”在比較句“A比B都W”觸發(fā)“B很W”的預設義,對于“都”在比較句中觸發(fā)的預設義,本文提供了三個預設相關測試,證明預設義的存在。

【文章頁數】：68 頁

【學位級別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
摘要
Abstract
Acknowledgements
Chapter One Introduction
    1.1 Motivation of the Research
    1.2 Objectives of the Research
    1.3 Significance of the Research
    1.4 Methodology of the Research
    1.5 Layout of the Thesis
Chapter Two Literature Review
    2.1 Introduction
    2.2 Studies on“Dou”
        2.2.1 “Dou”in Traditional Grammar
        2.2.2 “Dou”under Universal Quantification Theory
    2.3 Studies on Polarity Sensitivity
    2.4 Studies on “l(fā)ian...dou” Construction
    2.5 Studies on“A bi B dou W”Construction
    2.6 Summary
Chapter Three Theoretical Foundation
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Polarity Sensitivity
    3.3 Scalar Model of Polarity
    3.4 ALT+SCALE Mechanism
    3.5 Two Different Approaches of“Dou”
        3.5.1 Distributive Reading of“Dou”
        3.5.2 Scalar Reading of“Dou”
    3.6 Presupposition
        3.6.1 Theories of Frege and Strawson
        3.6.2 Presupposition Tests
    3.7 Related Formal Semantic Concepts
        3.7.1 Type Theory
        3.7.2 Lamnda Abstraction
        3.7.3 Semantics of Gradable Adjectives
    3.8 Summary
Chapter Four Analysis
    4.1 Introduction
    4.2 Classification of“A bi B dou W”
    4.3 Polarity Sensitivity Analysis
        4.3.1 A bi B1 dou W
        4.3.2 A bi B2 dou W
        4.3.3 A bi B3 dou W
    4.4 Presupposition of“Dou”
    4.5 Formalization of“Dou”
    4.6 Summary
Chapter Five Conclusion
    5.1 Major Findings
    5.2 Implications
    5.3 Limitations and Suggestions
References



本文編號：3997180