中美政治語(yǔ)篇中概念隱喻的對(duì)比研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2025-06-29 18:26
隱喻研究一直是全世界語(yǔ)言學(xué)家關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)。近幾十年來(lái),隱喻的相關(guān)研究取得了巨大的進(jìn)步。當(dāng)代認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)家認(rèn)為,隱喻不僅是一種修辭手段,而且是一種思維方式和認(rèn)知手段。隱喻普遍存在于我們的日常生活之中,存在于我們的思維和語(yǔ)言之中。我們賴以思考和行動(dòng)的概念體系從根本上說(shuō)也存在隱喻。因此,政治語(yǔ)言從本質(zhì)上來(lái)說(shuō)也是存在隱喻的。 從亞里士多德開(kāi)始,人們已經(jīng)對(duì)隱喻進(jìn)行了多方面的理論研究。亞里士多德的兩本聞名于世的著作《修辭學(xué)》和《詩(shī)學(xué)》標(biāo)志著對(duì)隱喻的系統(tǒng)性研究的開(kāi)始。在這兩部著作中,亞里士多德這樣描寫道:“隱喻是引領(lǐng)我們學(xué)習(xí)的優(yōu)美詞匯”,“掌握隱喻是天才的象征”(Aristotle,1954:22)。然而,亞里士多德只是將隱喻界定為一種起到美化語(yǔ)言作用的修辭格,而低估了隱喻的其他意義。二十世紀(jì)三十年代,伴隨著《修辭哲學(xué)》的出版,作為認(rèn)知語(yǔ)言學(xué)先驅(qū)的Richard強(qiáng)調(diào)“思想的隱喻性”,并稱“離開(kāi)隱喻,我們甚至無(wú)法理解普通語(yǔ)篇里的三個(gè)句子”(Richard,1936:94)。而Lakoff和Johnson將隱喻研究推向了更高峰。伴隨著《我們賴以生存的隱喻》的發(fā)表,隱喻研究翻開(kāi)了新的篇章,實(shí)現(xiàn)了從修辭作用的...
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】:64 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
Signiifeaneeoftheeurrentstudy
Researehmethodoloyg
Outline of the thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Traditional approaches to metaphor studies
1.2 Contemporary approaches to metaphor studies
1.3 Conceptual metaphor research
1.3.1 Lakoff's classification of conceptual metaphors
1.3.1.1 Structural metaphors
1.3.1.2 Orientational metaphors
1.3.1.3 Ontological metaphors
1.3.2 Features of conceptual metaphor
1.3.2.1 The pervasiveness of conceptual metaphor
1.3.2.2 The systematicity of conceptual metaphor
1.3.2.3 Cultural coherence of conceptual metaphor
1.4 Metaphor in political discourses
Chapter Two Methodology
2.1 The Critical Metaphor Analysis
2.2 Metaphor identification
2.3 Metaphor interpretation
2.4 Metaphor explanation
2.5 Research procedure
2.5.1 Data collection
2.5.2 Data analysis
Chapter Three Results and Discussion
3.1 Examples of conceptual metaphors in Chinese data
3.1.1 Journey metaphor
3.1.2 War metaphor
3.1.3 Building metaphor
3.1.4 Family metaphor
3.1.5 Circle metaphor
3.2 Examples of conceptual metaphors in American data
3.2.1 Journey metaphor
3.2.2 War metaphor
3.2.3 Building metaphor
3.2.4 Family metaphor
3.2.5 Religion metaphor
3.3 Identification and categorization of the metaphors in the data
3.4 Differences between similar conceptual metaphors in both data
3.4.1 Journey metaphor
3.4.2 Family metaphor
3.4.3 War metaphor
3.4.4 Building metaphor
3.5 Conceptual metaphors unique to the political discourses
3.6 Functions of conceptual metaphors in political discourses
3.6.1 The persuasion function
3.6.2 The motivation function
3.6.3 The filters function
3.6.4 The simplification function
3.6.5 The bridge function
Conclusion
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表
本文編號(hào):4054642
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】:64 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【文章目錄】:
Abstract
摘要
Introduction
Signiifeaneeoftheeurrentstudy
Researehmethodoloyg
Outline of the thesis
Chapter One Literature Review
1.1 Traditional approaches to metaphor studies
1.2 Contemporary approaches to metaphor studies
1.3 Conceptual metaphor research
1.3.1 Lakoff's classification of conceptual metaphors
1.3.1.1 Structural metaphors
1.3.1.2 Orientational metaphors
1.3.1.3 Ontological metaphors
1.3.2 Features of conceptual metaphor
1.3.2.1 The pervasiveness of conceptual metaphor
1.3.2.2 The systematicity of conceptual metaphor
1.3.2.3 Cultural coherence of conceptual metaphor
1.4 Metaphor in political discourses
Chapter Two Methodology
2.1 The Critical Metaphor Analysis
2.2 Metaphor identification
2.3 Metaphor interpretation
2.4 Metaphor explanation
2.5 Research procedure
2.5.1 Data collection
2.5.2 Data analysis
Chapter Three Results and Discussion
3.1 Examples of conceptual metaphors in Chinese data
3.1.1 Journey metaphor
3.1.2 War metaphor
3.1.3 Building metaphor
3.1.4 Family metaphor
3.1.5 Circle metaphor
3.2 Examples of conceptual metaphors in American data
3.2.1 Journey metaphor
3.2.2 War metaphor
3.2.3 Building metaphor
3.2.4 Family metaphor
3.2.5 Religion metaphor
3.3 Identification and categorization of the metaphors in the data
3.4 Differences between similar conceptual metaphors in both data
3.4.1 Journey metaphor
3.4.2 Family metaphor
3.4.3 War metaphor
3.4.4 Building metaphor
3.5 Conceptual metaphors unique to the political discourses
3.6 Functions of conceptual metaphors in political discourses
3.6.1 The persuasion function
3.6.2 The motivation function
3.6.3 The filters function
3.6.4 The simplification function
3.6.5 The bridge function
Conclusion
References
Appendix
Acknowledgements
學(xué)位論文評(píng)閱及答辯情況表
本文編號(hào):4054642
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/4054642.html
最近更新
教材專著