發(fā)布時間：2018-09-18 11:38

【摘要】：目的探討經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦出血與常規(guī)顱骨開瓣手術(shù)治療的臨床療效差異。方法選取2013年12月至2016年6月我科治療80例基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦出血患者,根據(jù)基底節(jié)區(qū)腦出血情況隨機篩選,經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療為實驗組,常規(guī)顱骨開瓣手術(shù)治療為對照組,觀察比較兩組并發(fā)癥情況,患者日常生活能力(ADL)評估。結(jié)果實驗組并發(fā)癥率10%,對照組為35%,實驗組明顯低于對照組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。實驗組40例患者生存為38例,其中ADL 1~2級13例,3級15例,4級10例,死亡2例;對照組40例患者生存為36例,其中ADL 1~2級10例,3級11例,4級15例,死亡4例。實驗組手術(shù)恢復療效顯著優(yōu)于對照組,差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(P0.05)。結(jié)論經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)有效清除治療基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦,減輕神經(jīng)細胞損傷,降低并發(fā)癥發(fā)生率,值得臨床廣泛應用。
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the clinical effects of microsurgery via lateral fissure approach in the treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia and routine craniotomy. Methods from December 2013 to June 2016, 80 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in basal ganglia were randomly selected and treated by microsurgery via lateral fissure approach. Routine craniotomy was performed in the control group. The complications of the two groups and the (ADL) evaluation of the patients' ADL were observed and compared. Results the complication rate was 10% in the experimental group and 35% in the control group, which was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P0.05). In the experimental group, 38 cases survived, including 13 cases of ADL grade 1, grade 2, 15 cases of grade 3, 15 cases of grade 4 and 2 cases of death, while the control group of 40 cases of survival was 36 cases, including ADL 1, grade 1, grade 2, grade 1, grade 3, grade 11, grade 4, death 4 cases. The effect of operation recovery in the experimental group was significantly better than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P0.05). Conclusion the microsurgery via lateral fissure approach is effective in the treatment of hypertensive brain in basal ganglia, which can reduce nerve cell injury and reduce the incidence of complications, which is worthy of extensive clinical application.
【作者單位】： 宿州市立醫(yī)院神經(jīng)外科;
【分類號】：R651.12;R544.1

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫昭勝;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路行高血壓性腦出血血腫清除術(shù)[J];急診醫(yī)學;1999年01期

2 蔡嵩;張強;王旭光;李新文;穆春雷;;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療基底節(jié)區(qū)出血療效分析[J];中國實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2013年23期

3 栗世方,扈國杰,周茂德,雷學,劉汝佩;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療殼核區(qū)高血壓腦出血[J];中國微侵襲神經(jīng)外科雜志;2003年10期

4 張剛中,顧峰,毋江,史建軍,李春燕;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)處理基底節(jié)區(qū)出血27例分析[J];實用神經(jīng)疾病雜志;2005年05期

5 徐巳奕;鐘春龍;鄭彥;張明坤;崔振文;吳增寶;王勇;江基堯;羅其中;;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療左側(cè)基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦出血[J];中華臨床醫(yī)師雜志(電子版);2011年22期

6 趙鵬洲;羅江兵;吳敬倫;歐英雄;余瑞鈿;;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路治療基底節(jié)區(qū)高血壓腦出血的臨床分析[J];河北醫(yī)學;2011年12期

7 寧波;張修寶;王國軍;張明然;蘇吉春;;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療高血壓腦出血療效觀察[J];山東醫(yī)藥;2007年09期

8 林濤;車海江;王曉明;馮磊;劉卓;蘇龍;;基底節(jié)區(qū)出血經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療[J];中華神經(jīng)外科疾病研究雜志;2011年03期

9 王鵬宇;;顯微鏡下經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路治療高血壓腦出血51例報告[J];中國民康醫(yī)學;2007年15期

10 林海峰;包金鎖;張彬;孫志剛;;小骨窗經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微外科治療高血壓腦出血(基底節(jié)區(qū)部位血腫)[J];吉林醫(yī)學;2008年03期

相關(guān)會議論文 前3條

1 張國君;遇濤;蔡立新;杜薇;王玉平;李勇杰;;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路122顳葉癲癇手術(shù)[A];中國醫(yī)師協(xié)會神經(jīng)外科醫(yī)師分會第二屆全國代表大會論文匯編[C];2007年

2 寧波;張修寶;王國軍;張明然;蘇吉春;;經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路顯微手術(shù)治療高血壓腦出血療效觀察[A];中華醫(yī)學會神經(jīng)外科學分會第九次學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2010年

3 張劍平;徐永康;趙玉祥;沈益金;柳中悅;;超早期小骨窗經(jīng)側(cè)裂入路微侵襲治療基底節(jié)血腫[A];2006年浙江省神經(jīng)外科學術(shù)會議論文匯編[C];2006年

，

本文編號：2247788