發(fā)布時間：2018-06-16 09:58

  本文選題：牽連犯 + 牽連關系�。� 參考：《甘肅政法學院》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：牽連犯是刑法理論中構造復雜、內涵模糊、構造奇特的一種犯罪形態(tài),由于涉及理論問題眾多而成為刑法理論中極富爭議的熱點問題,自產生以來經歷了近兩個世紀的漫長發(fā)展,學者們對牽連犯的相關理論研究也取得了階段性的成果。牽連犯作為一種客觀存在的特殊犯罪形態(tài),我國刑法分則雖然對此有所涉及,但由于未能明確牽連犯的具體內涵,沒有確立統(tǒng)一的處斷原則,在司法實務中對于未明文規(guī)定的牽連犯的處斷顯得十分混亂,在刑法理論學界中更是眾說紛紜,難有定論,無論是牽連犯的概念還是特征及處斷原則不同學派都存在著諸多爭議。 牽連犯特殊的罪數本質決定了對牽連犯的界定與處斷必須異于一般的單純一罪和一般的實質數罪,這就要求我們必須準確的劃定牽連犯的內涵及外延,以便全面認識把握牽連犯,在此基礎上尋求最為科學合理且符合法理的處斷原則。牽連犯涉及的刑法理論知識頗為艱深復雜,但最核心的問題就是牽連犯的認定和處罰原則的選擇,本文將就圍繞牽連犯理論中這兩個最為基本的問題展開論述,通過歸納總結并深入評析國內外不同學說,針對我國當前的立法實際和司法困境,就牽連犯的罪數本質和應適用從一重重處罰原則的依據等觀點進行詳盡的闡述。
[Abstract]:Implicated offense is a kind of criminal form with complicated structure, vague connotation and peculiar structure in the theory of criminal law. It has become a controversial hot issue in the theory of criminal law because of its numerous theoretical problems. After nearly two centuries of development, scholars have made some achievements in the theoretical research of implicated crime. As an objective and special form of crime, although the specific provisions of criminal law of our country are concerned with this, but because of the failure to make clear the specific connotation of implicated crime, we have not established a unified principle of adjudication. In the judicial practice, the conclusion of the unspecified implicated crime appears to be very confusing, and in the field of criminal law theory, there are many different opinions, which are difficult to come to a conclusion. There are many controversies in different schools of thought, whether it is the concept or characteristics of implicated offense and the principle of adjudication. The nature of the number of crimes in implicated crime determines that the definition and punishment of implicated crime must be different from that of simple crime and general substantial crime, which requires us to define the connotation and extension of implicated crime accurately. In order to fully understand and grasp the implicated crime, on this basis to seek the most scientific and reasonable and in accordance with the principle of adjudication. The knowledge of criminal law involved in implicated crime is very complicated, but the core problem is the identification of implicated crime and the choice of punishment principle. This paper will discuss the two most basic problems in implicated crime theory. Through summing up and deeply evaluating different theories at home and abroad and aiming at the current legislative practice and judicial dilemma in our country, this paper expounds in detail the essence of the number of crimes implicated and the basis for the application of the principle of heavy punishment.
【學位授予單位】：甘肅政法學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D924.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 趙俊新,黃洪波;論牽連犯[J];江漢論壇;2003年01期

2 儲槐植;孟慶華;;論有牽連關系的兩罪也應實行并罰[J];中外法學;1990年05期

3 高銘暄,葉良芳;再論牽連犯[J];現代法學;2005年02期

4 陳興良;禁止重復評價研究[J];現代法學;1994年01期

5 游偉;謝錫美;;對牽連犯處罰的思考[J];上海政法學院學報;2006年06期

6 劉憲權;我國刑法理論上的牽連犯問題研究[J];政法論壇;2001年01期

7 蘇敏華;;論瀆職罪與受賄罪的關系認定及其處斷原則[J];政治與法律;2010年02期

8 張小虎;;論牽連犯的典型界標[J];中國刑事法雜志;2013年05期

，

本文編號：2026272