發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-20 04:37

  本文選題：陳安仁　切入點(diǎn)：歷史教育　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：陳安仁,廣東東莞人,對(duì)現(xiàn)代史學(xué)有著重要的貢獻(xiàn)。本文主要從歷史教育的理論與實(shí)踐、中國(guó)文化史研究之再認(rèn)識(shí)以及宋明理學(xué)研究等方面入手,分析他的學(xué)術(shù)思想脈絡(luò)與特點(diǎn),客觀公正地評(píng)價(jià)陳安仁學(xué)術(shù)思想價(jià)值,對(duì)于更好地了解陳安仁的歷史價(jià)值以及他所處時(shí)代思想特征具有重要的參考。本文由緒論、正文和結(jié)語(yǔ)組成。緒論闡述選題意義、研究現(xiàn)狀和研究?jī)?nèi)容與方法。正文主要分為三章,第一章講陳安仁歷史教育研究的理論與實(shí)踐,主要從他對(duì)歷史教育的重要性、歷史教育的具體設(shè)計(jì)和歷史教育理論的研究等方面來(lái)分析,歷史教育的具體設(shè)計(jì)是這一部分的核心,重點(diǎn)分析師生的素養(yǎng)、教材的取舍以及歷史教育方法。第二章主要是陳安仁對(duì)中國(guó)文化史研究的再認(rèn)識(shí)。首先分析陳安仁書寫中國(guó)文化史的體例,然后與20世紀(jì)初梁?jiǎn)⒊�的新史學(xué)理論進(jìn)行比較,最后分兩個(gè)時(shí)段來(lái)分析他對(duì)中國(guó)文化的探討與建設(shè),進(jìn)而發(fā)掘陳安仁在文化史研究方面的意義和價(jià)值。第三章主要討論他對(duì)宋明理學(xué)的研究,闡述好他對(duì)宋明理學(xué)的發(fā)展流變及其各時(shí)期的特征的分析,然后研究他對(duì)王陽(yáng)明"致良知"說(shuō)的分析和"知行合一"說(shuō)的理解等。結(jié)語(yǔ)主要從整體上探討陳安仁的思想脈絡(luò)與特點(diǎn),進(jìn)而分析他在學(xué)術(shù)上的地位與影響。
[Abstract]:Chen Anren, a native of Dongguan, Guangdong, has made important contributions to modern historiography. This paper mainly starts with the theory and practice of historical education, the re-understanding of the study of Chinese cultural history, and the study of Song Ming's Neo-Confucianism, etc. The analysis of his academic thoughts and characteristics, and the objective and fair evaluation of Chen Anren's academic thought value have important reference to better understand Chen Anren's historical value and the ideological characteristics of his time. The main text is divided into three chapters: the first chapter describes the theory and practice of Chen Anren's historical education research, mainly from his importance to historical education. The specific design of historical education and the study of historical education theory are analyzed. The specific design of historical education is the core of this part, focusing on the analysis of the literacy of teachers and students. The second chapter focuses on Chen Anren's rethinking of the study of Chinese cultural history. First, it analyzes Chen Anren's style of writing Chinese cultural history, and then compares it with Liang Qichao's new historiography theory in early 20th century. Finally, it analyzes the significance and value of Chen Anren in the study of cultural history by analyzing his exploration and construction of Chinese culture in two periods. Chapter three mainly discusses his research on Song Ming's Neo-Confucianism. Expound his analysis of the development and evolution of Song Ming's Neo-Confucianism and the characteristics of each period, Then it studies his analysis of Wang Yangming's theory of "making conscience" and his understanding of "combination of knowledge and action". The conclusion mainly discusses Chen Anren's ideological context and characteristics as a whole, and then analyzes his position and influence in the academic field.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：K092

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 曹流;評(píng)陳安仁的《中國(guó)文化史》[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 高馨;民國(guó)時(shí)期明代學(xué)術(shù)思想史研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2015年

2 鄭先興;文化史研究的理論與實(shí)踐（1900—1949）[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1637563