發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-13 23:56

  本文選題：馬克思 + 黑格爾��； 參考：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：如果馬克思哲學(xué)就是費(fèi)爾巴哈唯物論與黑格爾辯證法的簡(jiǎn)單拼湊,我們就難以擺脫舊唯物主義或抽象人道主義的底層框架,我們所得到的馬克思哲學(xué)難免成為機(jī)械論的形而上學(xué)。這根源于傳統(tǒng)存在論把世界之外的存在作為世界的根據(jù),導(dǎo)致了對(duì)真正的存在的遺忘。重新詮釋馬克思,需要返回黑格爾哲學(xué)。黑格爾的存在不再是超越性的他者,而是在歷程中自我實(shí)現(xiàn)的。黑格爾哲學(xué)的真是融貫的意義網(wǎng)絡(luò),能夠彌合主客體之間的分裂。黑格爾哲學(xué)的善實(shí)現(xiàn)了“是”與“應(yīng)當(dāng)”的統(tǒng)一,從而也實(shí)現(xiàn)了與現(xiàn)實(shí)的和解。辯證邏輯則彌合了本體世界與現(xiàn)象世界的分立。正是這些主要概念,成為其通向馬克思的關(guān)鍵要素。通過(guò)這些理論要素帶給我們的啟示,可以更好地理解馬克思哲學(xué)。黑格爾哲學(xué)的存在啟發(fā)我們,馬克思的存在論旨在把存在從彼岸世界引回人的現(xiàn)實(shí)生命的存在。黑格爾哲學(xué)的真則啟發(fā)我們,馬克思以生存的本真狀態(tài)為符合論的真奠基。黑格爾哲學(xué)的善實(shí)現(xiàn)了與現(xiàn)實(shí)的和解,而馬克思在感性活動(dòng)中尋求善的實(shí)現(xiàn)。從黑格爾的辯證邏輯出發(fā),馬克思發(fā)掘作為生活內(nèi)在秩序的生活邏輯。這四個(gè)方面都指向馬克思的核心概念——實(shí)踐。歸納黑格爾通向馬克思的理論要素的啟示,我們可以得出馬克思哲學(xué)就是實(shí)踐哲學(xué)。而實(shí)踐哲學(xué)使物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)活動(dòng)納入倫理活動(dòng)之中,必然展開(kāi)為實(shí)踐倫理學(xué)。分析了實(shí)踐倫理學(xué)的基礎(chǔ),即實(shí)踐概念的內(nèi)涵要旨,即實(shí)踐概念的本源性、境域性、發(fā)生性、整體性和歷史性。馬克思哲學(xué)使人從實(shí)踐中領(lǐng)會(huì)存在,可以得出實(shí)踐倫理學(xué)的根本視角,即實(shí)踐生存論。論述了實(shí)踐倫理學(xué)的哲學(xué)原則,即實(shí)踐哲學(xué)對(duì)理論哲學(xué)的超越,以及對(duì)真善美的統(tǒng)一。實(shí)踐倫理學(xué)的革命意義即以“倫理學(xué)”作為第一哲學(xué)。實(shí)踐作為人的自由自覺(jué)的活動(dòng),內(nèi)在生發(fā)著善與價(jià)值序列,這是實(shí)踐的倫理意義。人在感性活動(dòng)中不但能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)人與物的相互成就,也能實(shí)現(xiàn)人的自由解放,從而生發(fā)適宜的倫理關(guān)系,并聯(lián)結(jié)為倫理共同體,為人的安身立命提供基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:If Marxist philosophy is a simple patchwork of Feuerbach materialism and Hegel's dialectics, we can hardly get rid of the old materialist or abstract humanitarian framework. The Marxist philosophy we have obtained inevitably becomes the metaphysics of mechanism. This is rooted in the fact that the traditional existentialism regards the existence outside the world as the basis of the world, which leads to the oblivion of the real existence. To reinterpret Marx, it is necessary to return to Hegel's philosophy. Hegel's existence is no longer the transcendent other, but self-realization in the course. Hegel's philosophy really melts the meaning network, can bridge the split between subject and object. The goodness of Hegel's philosophy realizes the unity of "is" and "ought", thus achieving reconciliation with reality. Dialectical logic has bridged the separation between the world of ontology and the world of phenomena. It is these main concepts that become the key elements leading to Marx. Through these theoretical elements, we can better understand Marxist philosophy. The existence of Hegel's philosophy enlightens us that Marx's existentialism aims to bring existence back to the existence of man's real life from the other side of the world. The truth of Hegel's philosophy enlightens us that Marx laid the foundation of the theory of conformity with the state of existence. Hegel's philosophy of goodness achieved reconciliation with reality, while Marx sought the realization of good in perceptual activities. Starting from Hegel's dialectical logic, Marx explored the logic of life as the internal order of life. These four aspects all point to Marx's core concept-practice. Summing up the enlightenment of Hegel's theoretical elements to Marx, we can conclude that Marxist philosophy is practical philosophy. But the practice philosophy brings the material production activity into the ethics activity, inevitably develops into the practice ethics. This paper analyzes the foundation of practical ethics, that is, the connotation and tenor of the concept of practice, that is, the origin, territory, occurrence, integrity and historicity of the concept of practice. Marx's philosophy makes people understand existence from practice, and can get the basic angle of view of practical ethics, that is, the theory of practical existence. This paper discusses the philosophical principles of practical ethics, that is, the transcendence of practical philosophy to theoretical philosophy, and the unity of truth, goodness and beauty. The revolutionary significance of practical ethics is to take ethics as the first philosophy. Practice, as a free and conscious activity of human beings, is immanent with the sequence of goodness and value, which is the ethical meaning of practice. In the perceptual activities, people can not only achieve mutual achievement between human beings and things, but also realize the free liberation of human beings, so as to develop appropriate ethical relations and form an ethical community in parallel, which provides a foundation for people to settle for their own lives.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：B516.35

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王南n\;;馬克思主義道德哲學(xué)何以可能?[J];天津社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年01期

2 高廣旭;;論馬克思倫理學(xué)的理論形態(tài)及其當(dāng)代意義[J];道德與文明;2015年01期

3 尚黨衛(wèi);;從理性邏各斯世界到感性邏各斯世界[J];江蘇大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年04期

4 鄭樺;任晴;;論馬克思哲學(xué)的生存論轉(zhuǎn)向[J];懷化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期

5 王結(jié)發(fā);;馬克思理論與功利主義[J];道德與文明;2012年04期

6 安啟念;;辯證唯物主義還是實(shí)踐唯物主義——再讀馬克思[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2011年03期

7 吳曉明;;馬克思的存在論革命與超感性世界神話學(xué)的破產(chǎn)[J];哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)理論研究;2010年00期

8 俞吾金;;重新理解馬克思哲學(xué)與黑格爾哲學(xué)之間的關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代國(guó)外馬克思主義評(píng)論;2007年00期

9 廖申白;;對(duì)倫理學(xué)歷史演變軌跡的一種概述(上)[J];道德與文明;2007年01期

10 吳曉明;論馬克思哲學(xué)中的主體性問(wèn)題[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2016074